Video of plane hitting Pentagon 9/11

[Vipergrün]

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentagon.video/index.html


Hard to see the actual plane. Appears to be skimming the ground.....that, or it's a Tomahawk missle..... You be the judge

[dstar]

I vote missle.

They blew it up themselves, because the work that was recently COMPLETED was a sham..... and they wanted to remodel anyway......

:-D

DSTAR

[dhoward]

[singpilot]

Anybody that believes that idiotic rumor needs to sneak into Mexico looking for work.

I suppose all of the people and crew are being held in a secret CIA prison somewhere....

You defame the surviving relatives and families of the Americans murdered by this terrorist act against this country by believing such a stupid rumor. You deserve the public and private derision you get by saying something so stupid. The only thing sadder is that you live in a country that allows you the freedom to speak so stupidly in public without realizing how lucky and stupid you really are.

Ok, I am better now.

I realize now why California had to remove the minimum score to allow some stupid people to graduate with their age group. Get this, you'll still have to take the test, but now, there's no need to pass it to graduate.

This is what happens when those people get out in public.

[Porrari]

I had to sit and listen to somebody at a party the other night trying to convince us that the whole 9/11 event was a gov plot. The claim that all the passengers are part of the conspiracy and have been given new identities by the feds. I would say more but I have to get off line because there are black helicopters hovering over my house at this moment.

[mede8er]

Pause the video @ 1:50 seconds and the fuselage comes into view.....

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by singpilot
[B]Anybody that believes that idiotic rumor needs to sneak into Mexico looking for work.

I suppose all of the people and crew are being held in a secret CIA prison somewhere....

No *****...I am so sick of these morons spewing this crap...by and large leftists...I cant wait to rub this in one associate's face, particularly, but something makes me think he is going to not let go of his nutter theory. I made the case you made, the crew and passengers case, and this guy said that they were killed by Bush's people or they are in hiding.

Unfreakinbelievable.

[andrew15]

The sad fact is, is that the conspiracy theory people will just denouce the tape as a fraud. ie-'the gov't had enough time to doctor the tape and it's fake, which means there's a cover-up and my conspiracy is now 'proven''.

AM

[techweenie]

Originally posted by andrew15
The sad fact is, is that the conspiracy theory people will just denouce the tape as a fraud. ie-'the gov't had enough time to doctor the tape and it's fake, which means there's a cover-up and my conspiracy is now 'proven''.

AM

So true.

And here's conclusive proof:

-----------------excerpt-----------------
Tampering With the Zapruder Film?

The legions of conspiracy theorists will be buzzing anew this week when a group of assassination pros call for a broader probe into the Nov. 22, 1963, slaying of President John F. Kennedy. Among the new concerns to be documented in a presentation near the White House Monday: possible hanky-panky with the famous Zapruder film--maybe to disguise another shooter--and suggestions that a second brain was used in an autopsy coverup.

Sounds zany, but the players appear legit. Leading the charge is Paul Kuntzler, president of the government transcription contractor Miller Reporting. He thinks the public's trust in Uncle Sam was punctured by the Warren Commission review and believes a new probe will restore it--especially since new info is available. Among those questioning the old evidence: Thomas Lipscomb, founder of Times Books, who was up for a Pulitzer for unveiling discrepancies in Sen. John Kerry's swift-boat record. He looked for continuity flaws in Zapruder by comparing the movie with photos taken at Dallas's Dealey Plaza. One discrepancy: Two women at the slaying site are shown wearing white sneakers when they actually wore black shoes. He's got the Polaroids to prove it. Lipscomb's stuff is so compelling that Fox and ABC are negotiating to buy it. He has no conspiracy theory but thinks the evidence was flawed and needs validation.
------------------------

[on-ramp]

no conspiracy. some people just want to sell books on the subject.

Here's the 1/2 second frame as the plane hits the GROUND first, then into the Pentagon.

What i've circled in RED is Flight 77.

[on-ramp]

here's the frame BEFORE the one above.

The RED circled is the plane.

[on-ramp]

[on-ramp]

this object (circled) is not in the previous frame, 1/2 frame before.

[VaSteve]

Good you guys saved me a lot of work. 1fastredsc, are you listening?

[Vipergrün]

Dang, you guys are harsh.....didn't ANYONE see my smiley......sheeesh.

[speeder]

I have no doubt that flight 77 slammed into the Pentagon on 9/11/01, and that that is a video of it, however it does nothing to convince any doubters because the object in those frames is moving too fast to be identifiable as a passenger jet in that low-quality security video. Too bad there did not just happen to be a camera in place closer to the impact that got a better picture.

Also, hasn't this video been out all along? I could swear that it's been posted here before, at any rate I've seen it or one just like it.

[911pcars]

There's nothing wrong with examining new data, then deciding whether it's possible or plausible before **** canning it, deem it likely or making it part of your belief system. I think these alternatives are better than blindly believing some govt. suit's version of what happened (especially nowadays).

Do I seem hesitant to believe everything from the lips of our govt.?

Sherwood

[RoninLB]

[Mulhollanddose]

I spit on Democrats, then a piss on them, then I go #2 on them.

[Vipergrün]

Originally posted by Mulhollanddose
I spit on Democrats, then a piss on them, then I go #2 on them.

Wow dood, this is a new all time low for you......