![]() |
help me understand IP addresses
The banning of a particular troll on the technical forum got me thinking…and I realized I don’t understand how this works. NOTE: I’m not up to anything mischievous here! I just want to understand.
I did some searching on Google, and it appears that an IP address can come from a computer, or another piece of hardware such as a router. So I’m wondering…. I have multiple computers plugged into a Linksys router; do they all appear as the same IP address on the internet? Does one’s ISP have anything to do with an IP address? Couldn’t a banned person just buy a used router on ebay for $40 each time they get banned? I'm guessing that managing banned people is an ongoing game of cat and mouse. Must be a lot of work. |
Every device on an IP network needs a unique address. You most likely have a private address at home; reserved IP space not routed externally. Simply, your linksys hides the IP's of your lan behind it's external interface address.
This address can be public or private, it's assigned by your ISP. In some cases your ISP gives your router a private address, so there is NAT happening twice. Also, your ISP can give you a dynamic (changes) or static (fixed) address. So, when you connect to Pelican Parts to buy car parts you could be coming from the same source or not, depends on how your ISP assigns addresses. On the back end, IP's can be blocked one at a time or in ranges. It's possible to block an entire ISP's space, but then you are limiting your sales. |
private adresses all have the same range, 192.168.1.x
this range never get's routed to other pc's , hence they can be used for Network Adress Translation eg , you get one public adress from your isp 234.234.234.234 , and yoru router translates that to and from your pc's in the 192.168.1 range... it's also a good security measure , since your pc's are not accessible to the internet, just your router is... as for blocking ip adresses, that works as long as the ip adress of the offender doesn't change to often, like on dial up modem... in those cases mods can ban a complete range , such as 234.234.234.x , or even wider 234.234.x.x but that has the disadvantage of banning everybody on the same network as the offender... |
Stijn's points are valid. In the case of my favorite little troll (aka Alina), her IP address changes because her ISP hasn't assigned her a static address. (I believe most ISP's assign dynamic IP's).
-Z-man. |
you could contact the ISP, and file a complaint for repeat offending , in this day an age, you have a good chance that the ISP will drop Alina like a brick... trolling ,repeat violations , it's not hacking but it's not something ISP's like to see on their networks...
and maybe if they don't drop her, they might give a static ip to alina's account, so you can properly ban |
either that or pass on the ip adress to a select few l33t haxors on the board.. and we'll make the problem go away :D
|
Quote:
|
Can't you just stop all inputs from the MAC address. Most people can't spoof them.
|
Stijn - not all private addys are in that set of subnets - there are also 10.0.0.0/8s, 172.16.*, etc. There are also reserved blocks and "hidden" things - for example, there's this great server for p0rn at 127.0.0.1 - visit it some time! Also, there are ranges reserved for other things, like 44.0.0.0/8 is all reserved as a HAM to IP gateway for packet radio data or email.
|
Quote:
Moreover, MAC addresses are only visible on the local segment. The MAC address on a packet is changed at each hop along a route. Frankly, forget the technical solutions. DHCP addressing makes it a near impossible task. Svandamme is right, simple get a solid lock on the persons IP on day, then complain to high heaven to their ISP. Most ISPs are not interested in trouble. Throw around terms like 'legal action' for good measure. Quote:
10.0.0.0 – 10.255.255.255 172.16.0.0 – 172.31.255.255 192.168.0.0 – 192.168.255.255 The 169.254.0.0 – 169.254.255.255 range is also reserved for automatic IP addressing in non DHCP environments. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Aurel |
Quote:
You are correct. The MAC is not part of the IP headers itself. You can make filtering decisions based on MAC address's, but these are not IP filters (Layer 3). |
Quote:
But I'll take the higher ground and figure out a legal way to get rid of the pesky troll... now where'd I put the number to the bat cave? Er, I mean the Pelican Cave? (Paging Mr. Wayne Dempsey... :D ) -Z-man. |
I think we need to just go whole hog, and geek out on a discussion of the history of IP subnet 0 (192.168.0.x).
|
Quote:
then look on their site for contact details, of when not sure, simply mail to abuse@alinasisp.net... that's the default alias for reporting abuse.. |
Quote:
|
HardDrive - if we did that we'd have to get in a discussion about who deserves a class A subnet more - MIT or the country of China? What about IPv6 vs. IPv4? Proper implementation of RFC1149 or even IP over Bongo Drum?
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website