Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   How fast are you? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/333417-how-fast-you.html)

Aurel 03-03-2007 05:22 AM

How fast are you?
 
I found this very nice speed test for internet connection:

http://www.speedtest.net/

Mine goes up to 4.8 Mbps. So, how fast is yours?

Aurel

IROC 03-03-2007 05:38 AM

Mine's wimpy. 3.8 Mbps. I'm not sure what my work connection would be...

tabascobobcat 03-03-2007 05:41 AM

3.77 Mbps downloading on the Cincinnatti server
4.44 Mbps onthe Chicago server

red-beard 03-03-2007 06:38 AM

4.8 Mbps down, tested several site. Using Timewarner Cable Roadrunner in Houston

speedracing944 03-03-2007 06:41 AM

35 kb/s download

78 kb/s upload

I am on a dead end country road running ancient phone cable w/ dial up.

Speedy:)

gprsh924 03-03-2007 07:19 AM

10.4 down

5.0 up

cincinatti server

onlycafe 03-03-2007 07:41 AM

165 mph @8500 rpm with targa top off.

red-beard 03-03-2007 07:44 AM

700-1200 kbps on my "backup" DSL line.

Pele911 03-03-2007 07:49 AM

4.9 seconds in the 40 yrd dash

Paul T 03-03-2007 07:50 AM

12.1 down
1.7 up

Upload seems slow...

rouxroux 03-03-2007 07:53 AM

baseball, baseball, baseball;)

jyl 03-03-2007 09:00 AM

Seems very server-dependent.

I'm on Comcast in Portland OR

6.99 down
0.36 up
Using Portland server

11.56 dowm
0.37 up
Using San Jose server

14.19 down
0.37 up
Using Seattle server

Happy with the downlink, not with the uplink but I don't really use up bandwidth much. Just makes it slow to save big files to the company server.

My bigger bottleneck is how to get internet upstairs to my study. Wireless is really slow. Thinking about getting someone to run Ethernet cable. Only affordable way to do this will be to run it on the outside of the house - yuck.

many944s 03-03-2007 09:23 AM

Depends on my partner... :D

Sorry, had to say it!

3.4 Mbps here with the Chicago server.

Icemaster 03-03-2007 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gprsh924
10.4 down

5.0 up

cincinatti server

Whose service are you using?

oldE 03-03-2007 09:26 AM

D i a l - u p h e r e.

V e r y s l o w !


Les

LeeH 03-03-2007 09:55 AM

8831 kb/s

HardDrive 03-03-2007 10:20 AM

3.8mb down
400k up.
Comcast, Seattle.

legion 03-03-2007 10:34 AM

4.2

But I think my wireless router is the bottleneck, not my cable broadband.

Mr_Wizard 03-03-2007 10:35 AM

740 kb/s Download

124 kb/s Upload

More than enough for what I use the net for. Even better it is only costing me 10 bucks a month. Road Runner Lite

livi 03-03-2007 10:39 AM

3.7

gprsh924 03-03-2007 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Icemaster
Whose service are you using?
I honestly do not even know. I go to school at Miami University in Oxford. I was just on their wireless network when I did the speed check.

BlueSkyJaunte 03-03-2007 10:50 AM

Seriously, 666 kb/s. :D

Sonic dB 03-03-2007 11:09 AM

8116 download
730 upload

Roadrunner "high speed" from Time Warner

kach22i 03-03-2007 11:34 AM

I don't know what to make of these numbers, did the test twice, a different browser each time.

First time:......................................

2968 kb/s Download

361 kb/s Upload



Second Time:..................................
3186 kb/s Download

362 kb/s Upload

jyl 03-03-2007 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jyl
Seems very server-dependent.

I'm on Comcast in Portland OR

6.99 down
0.36 up
Using Portland server

11.56 dowm
0.37 up
Using San Jose server

14.19 down
0.37 up
Using Seattle server

Happy with the downlink, not with the uplink but I don't really use up bandwidth much. Just makes it slow to save big files to the company server.

My bigger bottleneck is how to get internet upstairs to my study. Wireless is really slow. Thinking about getting someone to run Ethernet cable. Only affordable way to do this will be to run it on the outside of the house - yuck.

Now, doing the test from the laptop connected via the 802.11g wireless network

3.10 down
0.36 up
Using San Jose server

3.22 down
0.37 up
Using Seattle server

So something's gotta be done about the wireless network bottleneck. Any ideas? I could upgrade to 802.11n now that the new n-enabled Airport is available, and get new WLAN cards or USB adapters for the notebooks.

schnellfahrer 03-03-2007 12:37 PM

http://www.speedtest.net/result/94147474.png

svandamme 03-03-2007 01:55 PM

http://www.speedtest.net/result/94177430.png
http://www.speedtest.net/result/94178083.png

i have a light connection ...3 Mbps/1 Mbps
if i were to pay 59 euro's instead of 33, i'de have 20 Mbps/2 Mbps

TerryH 03-03-2007 02:10 PM

2889/737

Exactly what I'm paying $29.95/mo. for through Verizon DSL. When I had Verizon DSL in SoCal 8 yrs ago, it was horrible. They seem to have their act together now and priced well too. YMMV

You can read reviews, do testing and troubleshooting at www.dslreports.com

Waiting for ViOS to get here. Would rather go without than consider cable with T/W.

Clay Perrine 03-03-2007 04:58 PM

Pegged the meter in both directions.

But this was on my work computer.. and it sits right on the SONET ring internet backbone in Dallas.

:D

azasadny 03-03-2007 06:17 PM

I'm pretty consistent at 1.5Mbps download and 500kbps upload using my DSL.

JavaBrewer 03-03-2007 06:57 PM

Near the same as Art, SBC DSL is yielding 1574 kbs download and 388 kb/s upload. I'd go cable modem but my provider is Time Warner...no thanks.

BGCarrera32 03-03-2007 07:06 PM

Local server

9615 kbps download
367 kbps upload

Is that good or bad?

TerryH 03-03-2007 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BGCarrera32
Local server

9615 kbps download
367 kbps upload

Is that good or bad?

Better than average download, worse than average upload. You can get the porn much quicker than you can send it. :D

Drew001 03-03-2007 07:43 PM

http://www.speedtest.net/result/94276279.png

Not bad, I guess.

austin552 03-04-2007 06:08 AM

Going have to work on this
 
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1173017297.gif

jyl 03-04-2007 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jyl
So something's gotta be done about the wireless network bottleneck. Any ideas? I could upgrade to 802.11n now that the new n-enabled Airport is available, and get new WLAN cards or USB adapters for the notebooks.
To you networking-savvy guys, here is a test of the new Airport. The weakness appears to be slow NAT on the WAN port. Is this a showstopper for home use, do you think? I do not have any fancy home network in mind - just the basic cable modem -> airport -> PC/mac via LAN and WLAN.

http://www.macintouch.com/reviews/airportn/

red-beard 03-09-2007 09:34 AM

Well, I'm stuck using my Cell phone for a data connection today. I decided to check the speed. I'm surprised it is 256kbs download! I'd say pretty darn good for an Edge phone. Upload is 80-90kbps.

stevepaa 03-09-2007 09:42 AM

12/10 at work

jluetjen 03-09-2007 11:28 AM

3533 down, 353 up on Comcast DSL.

911teo 03-09-2007 12:39 PM

OK... I got 1.5mb up and 1.5mb down. Very consistent every time.
We have a T1 line.. what should I get?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.