![]() |
Here's a good example of government encroaching on our freedoms being fought square in the bastion of liberalism and freedom, San Francisco:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/08/nsa-hearing-ope.html#more |
Quote:
|
Quote:
By the way, when a judge is considered "liberal" on issues like this, it means he leans toward protecting the right of privacy. When a judge is "conservative" on this kind of issue, it means he leans in the direction of gubmit control rather than personal privacy. Is that why you guys consider liberals to be lower than terrorist trash? Because we lean in the direction of personal freedoms and liberties? Like it or not, "liberal" means "free." There are no hippies who prefer to be spied on. As always, I am a bit mystified by you guys' description of yourself as "freedom loving conservatives" and folks like me as "control oriented liberals." That has never made sense to me. |
Quote:
|
As a general comment to this entire thread, I just want to say that in a democratic government the public is the boss. The general public vote the people in office who uphold similar beliefs as the majority of the population. There is supposedly no divide between the government and the people that elect it. It is OUR government. In a similar vein, it is MY personal opinion that, for the government to hold secrets from the people that elect it, totally defeats the ideals that make the entire system work. To vote for someone who actually states that they intend to support laws that give the government more control and the general population less is chipping away at democracy. It makes the government and the people two separate entities, which is NOT what democracy is.
Now, I've not stated whether I consider myself democrat, republican, liberal, conservative, etc. If you've formed an opinion about me based on the previous paragraph, it says more about the current political environment of the country than it does for me or you. |
civilizations are defined and exist only through war and economics.
The Constitution is not a suicide pact. The 10th Amendment has been eroded by Congress, the Executive, and the Judiciary [even the Supreme Court]. It's purpose is to foster federalism so a central gov't has to answer to the states in any matter not granted them by the Constitution. So it's not just the progressives that feel it's a living Constitution that has to be fixed every generation. The current progressive mass-media opinion leader is the NY Times. Just about every newspaper in the US waits for the headlines of the NYT so they can format their headlines. The controller of the NYT was arrested 3x during anti-war rallies in the 1960's. most people get their info from mass-media. |
Quote:
Ron, that line was tired the first time you used it ages ago. Give it up. If you don't like the Constitution, and living within its constructs, there are plenty of other countries out there for you. Live Free or Die is not just a NH license plate. The Founding Fathers would be very disappointed in the State of the Nation today. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
obviously my words are over your head.. sorry "Live Free or Die is not just a NH license plate." --------- is that your idea of an oxymoron ? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sure they do. Allah is God in a different language. |
Quote:
Nothing wrong with being uninformed, just dont bury your head in the sand. |
Quote:
|
LMFAO
The uninformed one with the head in the sand is you, Mule. Your problem, not mine. Good day. SmileWavy |
Quote:
ps: What I've described is DIRECTLY the result of Homeland Security budgets being misused & abused... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The problem with warrantless wiretapping (for those who actually buy into the "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" crap) is thus:
You let the government into your Constitutionally-protected private communications and first off, do you think you'll EVER get that freedom back, once it's been given up? Let's not kid ourselves. The #1 goal of government is maximizing control over the populace. I can think of not a single instance of government relinquishing control they gained. Think of this scenario - you let the government wiretap your phones under the rationale of "we want to screen for possible terrorist communications", which you don't partake in. Think they just chuck the phone records then? Nope. When they get around to it, they'll revisit them in order to screen for violations of any/all other laws (including those which either may not exist yet, or may be so obscure you're not even aware you're violating them). There are so many laws on the books, can ANYONE honestly claim to know all of them? Are you 100% sure you're not breaking some law even by sitting here reading this? I'll bet you are. That's where we are. Rule #1 - don't give 'em an easy one. Government and law enforcement have crossed a threshold in this country where they are no longer accountable to anyone and do not represent the public. They are NOT your friends, much as they might try and brainwash you into thinking so. You want to give up the ONLY rights standing between us and totalitarianism? Be my guest. Just don't drag the rest of us down with you. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website