![]() |
The only reason that Clinton was mentioned is because he would have no reason not to go after Cheney and put him in jail if he had actually committed a crime. A scandal does not a crime make.
|
Quote:
|
nah,
but these quotes will "I think they're in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency." June 20, 2005 " "My belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators." --March 16, 2003 "I had other priorities in the sixties than military service." April 5, 1989 and the best ones I think that the proposition of going to Baghdad is also fallacious. I think if we were going to remove Saddam Hussein we would have had to go all the way to Baghdad, we would have to commit a lot of forcebecause I do not believe he would wait in the Presidential Palace for us to arrive. I think we'd have had to hunt him down. And once we'd done that and we'd gotten rid of Saddam Hussein and his government, then we'd have had to put another government in its place. What kind of government? Should it be a Sunni government or Shi'i government or a Kurdish government or Ba'athist regime? Or maybe we want to bring in some of the Islamic fundamentalists? How long would we have had to stay in Baghdad to keep that government in place? What would happen to the government once U.S. forces withdrew? How many casualties should the United States accept in that effort to try to create clarity and stability in a situation that is inherently unstable? I think it is vitally important for a President to know when to use military force. I think it is also very important for him to know when not to commit U.S. military force. And it's my view that the President got it right both times, that it would have been a mistake for us to get bogged down in the quagmire inside Iraq. —Cheney at the Washington Institute's Soref Symposium, April 29, 1991 And the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam worth? And the answer is not very damned many. —Cheney, at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Washington, August 1992. tell that to the banged up vet's, widows, orphans, and families who lost a loved one over there in Iraq text book neoconfusion. |
Let's get back to the original question boys. You've gone a bit OT.
I say Tom Cruise for President. |
|
jesse ventura.http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1201458109.jpg
|
Quote:
i can see the campaign slogan "that's hot!" |
Quote:
|
good point
|
I think it would be hot if Prince was Prez.
"The Artist formally known as the President of the United States" |
|
Me.
|
Quote:
Arnold is no good, foriegn born, if we are going with a furriner, I would back Markus, if only to be able to call him "President Fluffer" How about Chuck Norris? If Chuck were president, there would be no more wars, because he would kick your ass if you started trouble |
Forget Huckabee, let's go straight for Chuck Norris!;)
|
Hows bout Bill Clinton. Among all of his many talents, he is a dab hand with the staff.
|
Quote:
|
Gene Wilder and Gilda Radner
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
you care more about a president getting some ugly intern to blow him, and lie about that then you care about the current batch of chickenhawks lying all the time about actual wars and decisionmaking... further documentation for the term "neoconfused" |
But not convicted.....for lying about a blow job.
Bush...he's killed how many US citizen's in the mid east and I'm paying double for my 87 octane...... Not to mention that I'm providing free health care to all the illegals that are in the ER while I pay three times what I paid ten years ago for my crappy HMO..... Frankly, I'd rather have the blow job..... |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website