Where did they come from? - Page 10

dewolf · 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyg2

No. Wrong. I never agreed with them, I just used their own indecisions and flawed theories to demonstrate ho inaccurate it is and how unsupported the arguments made here are when they are based on what these scientists say.
BTW,you need to chill. Either that or ESAD.

LOL, I think your the one who needs to chill. ESAD, very Christian of you. Like I said, hypocrite. Back to your fairy tales boy

sammyg2 · 05-03-2008, 08:31 AM

I've met many people from Australia over the years. One of them I actually liked.
The rest of them were, well they were like you.

dewolf · 05-03-2008, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyg2

I've met many people from Australia over the years. One of them I actually liked.
The rest of them were, well they were like you.

WTF has that got to do with it. Fortunately I'm not as stupid as you and realise that most Americans are friendly well natured people, unlike you. Hypocrite. Again, back to your fairytale boy. LOL

dewolf · 05-03-2008, 08:41 AM

Actually I'm beginning to see a pattern between you religious people here. You all seem to be very aggressive when questioned about your beliefs. I can see what a peaceful bunch you really are. The only one that hasn't resorted to name calling or aggressive behaviour is Trekkor.

trekkor · 05-03-2008, 09:01 AM

Even though we disagree, I thank you for seeing who I am.

Again much appreciation and thanks.

KT

dewolf · 05-03-2008, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trekkor

Even though we disagree, I thank you for seeing who I am.

Again much appreciation and thanks.

KT

Agreed. I know your a good hearted bloke Trek. Cheers.

m21sniper · 05-03-2008, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun 84 Targa

Just looked it up, thanks, appears to be the answer.

pretty sad really. God creates us, we f'up, finds one good guy and his family, destroys the rest of the world, and in just a few generations we're trouble again. Makes you wonder why he didn't just end it all instead of scattering across the Earth.

God isn't so good in the futures market, that's for sure.

You know, if there is a good, i'm pretty sure you're totally screwed.

m21sniper · 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trekkor

Man was created 6,000 years ago.

KT

That seems to be a wildly ridiculous statement from where i sit.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dewolf

In paragraph one you mock science, yet in paragraph two you agree with science?. Gee, it wouldn't be because (supposedly) it backs up your fairytale would it? Typical religious hypocrisy.

I believe he did it to mock science directly.

How the hell did you miss the obviousness of that?

Quote:

Originally Posted by dewolf

LOL, I think your the one who needs to chill. ESAD, very Christian of you. Like I said, hypocrite. Back to your fairy tales boy

Civics lesson of the day:

That is a highly offensive term in America when used as you just used it. Don't use it around blacks(seriously- it could get you killed) or anyone at or near the poverty line when you are here. In many cases, this is true even if you know the person well.

Shaun @ Tru6 · 05-03-2008, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trekkor

Even though we disagree, I thank you for seeing who I am.

Again much appreciation and thanks.

KT

You ever gonna answer the question Trek?

m21sniper · 05-03-2008, 09:49 AM

He's probably going by this:

"Oldest Written Form
Some people base their answer on which language got written down first. If you're counting absolute oldest, probably Sumerian or Egyptian wins because they developed a writing system first (both start appearing in about 3200 BC). If you're counting surviving languages, Chinese is often cited (first written in 1500 BC), but Greek is a possible tie because it was written in Linear B beginning ca. 1500 BC.*

*Data from "Ancient Scripts of the World" (http://www.ancientscripts.com)"

You can't have written history without writing, right?

I am pretty sure that man predates the oldest recorded written language by a looooooong time.

trekkor · 05-03-2008, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun 84 Targa

You ever gonna answer the question Trek?

You mean the one about man existing no more than 6,000 years ago?

The 'scientific' evidence ( or lack thereof ) shows this to be true.

Man leaves traces of himself everywhere he's been. ( litterbug! )
Before the Bible's account of creation, no litter!

The evidence clearly is NOT there.
Unless you include the 'seems, mights, appears to be, could be's, etc, etc' which, of course, have no real proof!

KT

m21sniper · 05-03-2008, 09:57 AM

You discount fossilized tools and spear points, etc?

trekkor · 05-03-2008, 09:59 AM

Quote:

pretty sure

I missed that one

Man was created with the abilty to think and communicate.

KT

Shaun @ Tru6 · 05-03-2008, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trekkor

You mean the one about man existing no more than 6,000 years ago?

The 'scientific' evidence ( or lack thereof ) shows this to be true.

Man leaves traces of himself everywhere he's been. ( litterbug! )
Before the Bible's account of creation, no litter!

The evidence clearly is NOT there.
Unless you include the 'seems, mights, appears to be, could be's, etc, etc' which, of course, have no real proof!

KT

Absence of evidence isn't evidence.

What are your sources for man existing for 6000 years? I don't know how much more clear I can be.

m21sniper · 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trekkor

I missed that one

Man was created with the abilty to think and communicate.

KT

Sounds like an opinion to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun 84 Targa

Absence of evidence isn't evidence.

Sure it is.

There are no living T-rexes. How do i know? Never seen one. Now go ahead and tell me there is no evidence that there are no T-rexes.

trekkor · 05-03-2008, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun 84 Targa

Absence of evidence isn't evidence.

What are your sources for man existing for 6000 years? I don't know how much more clear I can be.

Are you suggesting that man has been here longer, even though no evidence exists to support that?

The evidence *should* be abundant and clear, without room for interpretation.
It is NOT.

Your turn

KT

trekkor · 05-03-2008, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Sounds like an opinion to me.

I understand your point of view.
There is NO other alternative, however.

( one real evidence and actual proof )

It's true, we do not understand creation. It doesn't mean it is false.
We may never fully understand creation. That would be OK.

KT

m21sniper · 05-03-2008, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trekkor

Are you suggesting that man has been here longer, even though no evidence exists to support that?
KT

You mean besides fossilized tools and weapons, of course.

Quote:

Originally Posted by trekkor

I understand your point of view.
There is NO other alternative, however.
KT

Sounds like more opinion.

trekkor · 05-03-2008, 10:19 AM

Quote:

You mean besides fossilized tools and weapons, of course.

Yes, I've seen those. They're really cool.

They are not that old, though.

The rocks they are made from could be millions of years old, no doubt, but as tools...No.

KT

trekkor · 05-03-2008, 10:22 AM

I'm in the middle of a really interesting marble bathroom project. Fossils in every piece.

The bathroom is not even completed, but nobody thinks it's millions of years old because the rocks are

KT