![]() |
Quote:
Why doesn't the gov't. have to pass a competency test? It's my money to begin with! You think I should have to prove to you or someone else that I can manage it better in order for it to not be stolen? Unreal. |
Quote:
You are wrong here again. yes, you have to pass a test, because as I said, the alternative will cost the taxpayers more than just leaving it alone. We only need to look at the housing crisis bailout to support this thesis. The average American is not qualified to manage a lifetime portfolio. If you are, my plan takes care of you. |
A few years ago I was finally earning enough that I could make my house payments AND buy a used car without financing it. I felt like I had finally reached "middle class".
|
Shawn seems to be dodging my suggestion, instead operating on the assumption that every American would invest their SS money in Enron stock.
Shawn, right now my money is essentially an IOU. You're saying that I could somehow do worse? Furthermore, what qualifies YOU to tell ME what I do with my money? |
The whole concept of "social security" showes how effed up this society is. The government is TAKING our money and we're debating whether Americans are smart enough to manage their own finances. Holy cow. It's like Thom says, it is a tax.
|
I can't imagine a scenario in which the benefits of the current SS situation would outstrip a complete overhaul and allow the taxpayer a say in the matter. Unfathomable how you want to turn it over to a govt entity that has repeatedly screwed the pooch.
|
Quote:
Why should my failure cost the taxpayers a dime? No one should be responsible for me but me. |
Quote:
What qualifies me? Nothing other than I will have to pay more if you fail, for whatever reason. that is why you need to take a class which would cover everthing from types of investment vehicles all the way to due diligence techniques to avoid being taken. You see Matt, when investment vehicles that are created that are so sophisticated that even top investment professionals don't understand them (mortgage backed securities) and the result is huge, long-time investment banks going under as well as institutions like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are close to insolvency, resulting in massive government bailouts paid for by you and me, that is my proof that the average American would fail in managing their lifetime portfolios. of course the massive credit card debt and living beyond their means of most Americans is the final nail in the coffin. If deregulated and privatized, overnight you would see an entire industry of exotic investment vehicles that would result in ruining the country's economy. But don't take my word for it, just look at reality. When will you have the reconciliation ready? Rick will need it. |
Quote:
The real debate is whether the government should take it in the first place. That's an honest discussion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Unreal indeed. Even a chipmunk is smart enough to store some nuts away for later. But I guess if the government did it for him long enough, he'd too be as dumb as Shaun's average American. |
Quote:
Why don't you go and find the rate at which American's are saving $ over the last 50 years. That graph will give you the answer you don't want. |
Quote:
And it is only democratic. We out number them, out vote them and they need to do what we say.:) |
Quote:
How are you coming along with the reconciliation of housing crisis, massive credit card debt, no savings against Americans are smart enough/have time enough to manage lifetime investment. I believe you were in the forefront of chastising all those millions of Americans who took out ARMs and can't pay them back. Your intellectual dishonesty in chastising that group of average Americans and then saying average Americans do have the smarts, time, sophistication, desire to manage their own portfolios is staggering. Just admit you were wrong and move on. I don't have time to keep telling you so. |
That will work out well when "the rich" and "rich corporations" fire employees and move their operations (and their money) overseas. I've never gone to work for a poor man.
Shawn, I'm still waiting on your proof that the average American can't choose from a list of mutual funds, CDs, and bonds. Personally, it took me about 20 minutes to go through a book and choose several funds. Yes, I think people the took out IO mortgages and ARMs are idiots. I also think they should pay for their mistakes. But offering a variety of approved options for investment of SS is nearly foolproof. |
personal savings rate
http://blog.mariah.com/2008/04/understanding-the-personal-savings-rate/ truly a nation of big brains. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Shaun is right and wrong. The cure for our abysmal savings rate is not SS, which is clearly broken and managed at the whim of politicians, always a disaster.
Interesting in that the current state of financial malaise in this country can be traced to the development of the nanny-state, the great society. I'd also add a dash of Ad Men as well. How to fix it? First, simplify the tax code. I'm a flat tax guy but many here are not, but we still have got to simplify. Second, privatize SS along sound financial planning tenants. It is clear to me that many Americans have no interest in their financial future. I would cut the mandatory withholds in half to make the folks like me (who understand the really simple and basic tenants of financial planning and who may never see a dime of their SS "investment")) somewhat pleased and put the other half in sound, basic, get me 3% compound interest for 50 years investments. Third. All private investments would be off budget, meaning they are not counted anywhere in the federal budget. Period. Gone. Fourth. The money in the private accounts can not be used for any investment other than simple interest. No risk, lots of gain as the miracle of compound interest takes hold. Fifth. No lump sum buyout at 65 unless you have $2M in personal funds accrued. One should be rewarded for sound financial planning and should have access to their funds. Sixth. On the sixth day, I rest:cool: |
Well the government already runs a plan similar to a 401k. The TSP(thrift savings plan) 5 individual index fund choices and 5 lifcycle choices. Why not expand this type of offering to include your social security? I don't see that this program is wrought with corruption. My father, not a genious investor, has done fine buy simply putting half his money into the S&P500 option and half into the goverment bond fund.
|
Quote:
Excellent solution...I should have thunk it. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website