![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
eh, dont be to sure about that...technically yes, but it was their convention. esample gave the best description of what goes on in these situations, however if the song had been used as part of the campaign officially....then the songwriters WOULD have rights beyond ASCAP's "blanket liscense" for arenas etc. My guess is that Heart does own at least part of the publishing which is why (other than the benefits of publicity and political posturing) they are making the stink. |
Quote:
Copyright attorneys live for ignorance like yours. You're the type that keeps them employed. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
2. AFAIK, political parties do not broadcast conventions...perhap you should be suing CNN or MSNBC |
Quote:
If you don't understand what the word "broadcast" means, then I have to conclude that you are dense. Occasionally, You actually post something worth reading which is why I haven't filtered out your noise (like I have most of the other Right-wingers), but you are being deliberately obstinate in this thread. And btw, I'm not really a liberal. I'd say I'm more of a Libertarian. |
Quote:
"Copyright law may not be on the Wilsons' side as the song is licensed for public performance under a blanket fee paid by the venue to ASCAP, the firm that collects royalties on behalf of composers and copyright owners." How can we be sure the GOP Convention is a public performance? To me, the convention seems more like a private convention that was publicized to the public. After all, weren't people, such as delegates invited to the event? Not just anyone could show up off the street, right? |
Quote:
My understanding of the word "broadcast" when used as a verb is: "to transmit (programs) from a radio or television station." If you have a better definition: please provide it. |
Quote:
2. The convention had reporters from various networks present, and those networks did broadcast from the convention, but no network exclusively "broadcasts" the convention. That was the GOP's job. |
Quote:
Your point is moot. If it were a private performance, the GOP would not have to have paid at all...any more than you would have to pay to play records at your private party. |
Quote:
A private party and the GOP Convention don't really compare. One reason is the video cameras. |
Quote:
The GOP does not have the means to broadcast anything. The networks broadcast it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website