Wow, even more hardcore than the GT3-powered, manual-only 911 I posted about last week. Now a GT3 RSR for the street?

Porsche 911 GT3 RSR Rumor

I could go for that. Might even be willing to swap my 964 garage queen straight up for it. :cool:

Morning all. I went back to sleep for a little while longer. I could get used to doing this every weekday. :D

Jeff, how about a minivan like this one?

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7JHOr9XvaxI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Well that is just a Renault engine, ;)

Sounds cool however.

Evening Y'all

That's cool but still no.

About to go drinking...er...golfing. Hooroo for now SmileWavy

Had two different mini vans, but they were to haul my radio controlled planes to the flying field and back. Had a Jeep Cherokee I carted them in before the vans.

After drinking over a quart of water from 3pm to 3:30pm was not able to pee for the drug test. At 6pm they gave up on me and took some hair to test. As of 8:30pm tonight I still haven't had to go pee. Think I am still a little messed up from that antibiotic cycle.

You need to install a new tap. :)

Minivans? Ack!

I gots the wobbly boot

Can't you take a shot for that? ;)

They prolly do but I'm not privy to them meds

I'm really drunk..i don't think I've been this really drunk for a really long time

I was thinking more along the lines of a shot of your favorite adult beverage, Jeff. You must really be wobbly to have missed that! :p

Shazza won't let me put my dick on her shoulder...wtf?

Yep, I'm really drunk

Good morning folks.

Hmmm she's gone to bed and I'm not allowed to leave the lounge room...whats that all about"

Congradulations Jeff, you have managed to achieve the level "Dog House Drunk!"

Wow, I was looking to see if Rod Serling from the Twilight Zone was watching from around a wall. I felt like I was in the twilight zone.

One of the challenges of finding the old historical negatives we have is figuring out which system was in use for that era. The former owner invented his own system for filing negatives and would just start completely over with a new system but never update the old negative numbers to the newer system. Then a few years later start a new system or throw in some of the old system. It has taken me 10 years to get to know the different ways of finding a negative in a date range.

I was looking for a certain square mile and according to that reference book it was supposed to be in 4490-17. The final step is to lay eyes on the image to see if if looks like the reference image. Nothing was the same, I kept looking and trying to figure out what was where and nothing was even close. I finally walked away, answered a few emails and then went back to the start over from the beginning. Looking closely I found the answer. It was supposed to be negative 4990-17! :eek: The former owner was not known for his penmanship except for maybe a lack of it. That 9 looked more like a 4. I rewrote it in cleanly and I think Rod Serling went away.

So the lesson is: 4 is a lot different than 9. I just thought might want to know that. ;)

64 isn't nearly as interesting as 69. Especially since I have no idea what 64 even means.