Noah930 |
05-27-2010 04:16 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moses
(Post 5374292)
Here's an interesting take...
I worked in London for a year. A friends teenage son referred to me as "Mr." His father gently corrected him; "To address him as "Mr." is not rude, but it is incorrect. His title is "Dr." You can correctly address him by his first name or even call him a Yankee wanker, but he cannot be properly called "Mr." :)
|
Hmm. Interesting. I've been told (by my British-trained attendings when I was a student and resident) that often the title of "Mr." is used in the surgical world.
I have no problem with people being called Dr. if they have a doctorate in something other than medicine. I think it's a bit ghey to require others to refer to you as such outside of the proper professional context, but that's IMO. I fall into the category that when you call someone a doctor, they're a medical-type doctor (dentist, DO, optometrist, podiatrist, chiro, etc). Mainly because it makes life less confusing.
What I always found funny were the times in the hospital where people would be very insistant that I call their family member to explain their medical problem, as their family member was a "doctor." So I'd call up the doctor family member to explain the patient's situation. Along the course of the conversation, I'd ask what type of doctor they were so that I could form the conversation to fit their knowledge base. More often than not, the more insistent the original person was that I call their "doctor" parent/in-law/uncle/etc, the more likely the doctorate was in something totally useless from a clinical perspective. They'd be a biochemist or psychologist or something equally removed from critical care.
|