![]() |
|
|
|
AutoBahned
|
the Aston is the princess and the Porsche Panamera is the frog
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: AZ
Posts: 8,414
|
At $201,350 to start, the Rapide costs more than twice the $90,000 base price of the Panamera S and $60,000 more than a Panamera Turbo.
That Panamera Turbo, it must be said, comes closer to the elusive ideal of a four-door sports car. The Porsche is not only faster and sharper-handling than the Rapide, but it is more practical, with a far roomier back seat and cargo hold. Yeah, I'd say so. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,551
|
No question which is the most aesthetically pleasing...but then, Aston Martins have always been sexier than Porsches. Nice to see some consistency, yes?
__________________
"Now, to put a water-cooled engine in the rear and to have a radiator in the front, that's not very intelligent." -Ferry Porsche (PANO, Oct. '73) (I, Paul D. have loved this quote since 1973. It will remain as long as I post here.) |
||
![]() |
|
Work in Progress
|
Which do you prefer:
Form follows Function or Function Follows Form? With 200,000 burning a hole in my pocket I'd take a GT3-RS and a 5 Series BMW over either of the "4-door sports cars."
__________________
"The reason most people give up is because they look at how far they have to go, not how far they have come." -Bruce Anderson via FB -Marine Blue '87 930 Last edited by Rich76_911s; 05-29-2010 at 07:05 PM.. Reason: For Rwebb |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Higgs Field
Posts: 22,633
|
If I wanted a car with absolutely useless back seats I'd buy an early 911.
__________________
Jeff '72 911T 3.0 MFI '93 Ducati 900 Super Sport "God invented whiskey so the Irish wouldn't rule the world" |
||
![]() |
|
AutoBahned
|
how 'bout: Form follows Function?
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Bandwidth AbUser
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 29,522
|
Useless? WTF? They're great for storage.
![]()
__________________
Jim R. |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 21,159
|
The Aston Martin puts the Panamera to absolute shame in the looks department.
|
||
![]() |
|
drunk and stupid
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,619
|
I got the chance to see a Panamera and a Quattroporte side by side today. It's difficult to articulate, but the Porsche just didn't have the presence that QP possessed. They had almost identical gimmicky features, but the execution was smoother on the Maserati. It almost made the Panamera feel cheap which is odd given that their MSRP's are pretty close.
|
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 21,159
|
The Quattroporte is in an entirely different league than the Panamera style wise, IMO.
|
||
![]() |
|
It'll be legen-waitforit
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 6,996
|
What about the new lambo?
![]()
__________________
Bob James 06 Cayman S - Money Penny 18 Macan GTS Gone: 79 911SC, 83 944, 05 Cayenne Turbo, 10 Panamera Turbo |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 21,159
|
The new lambo is at least as ugly as the panamera.
|
||
![]() |
|
drunk and stupid
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8,619
|
I don't think the Panamera is a particularly ugly car (Seriously have you seen the feces GM and Ford are putting out?), but yeah, it's just not even close to a Maserati in looks or execution.
|
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 21,159
|
Honestly, i would much, much, much rather have one of the new Cadillac or Lincoln performance models than a Panamera.
![]() The CTS-V is also way less money. I would LOVE to see a 928 retrofitted with a Panamera Turbo engine though. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
It's even more expensive when you have to buy three Astons. one to drive while the other two are in the shop. It is British after all.
![]() Looks are great if impressing the shallow is all you care about. I'd prefer to be thought about as being wise and making smart choices. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Higgs Field
Posts: 22,633
|
The Porsche is the only true four door sedan of the lot. The Aston, Lambo, and Maserati are no more than four door coupes. Why bother?
__________________
Jeff '72 911T 3.0 MFI '93 Ducati 900 Super Sport "God invented whiskey so the Irish wouldn't rule the world" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hinsdale, IL
Posts: 3,428
|
Clarkson likes the Maser the best
Jeremy Clarkson Maserati Quattroporte 4.2 V8 review | Driving - Times Online I love his writing
__________________
Garrett Living and Thriving |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Correct.
__________________
88' Carrera, Black/Black/Black, "Murdered Out" OEM. 06' BMW 'M' Roadster (Wife's car and WAY faster than mine) |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Quote:
I agree Aston Martins are much better looking but like others wrote, form follows function.
__________________
2014 Cayman S (track rat w/GT4 suspension) 1979 930 (475 rwhp at 0.95 bar) |
||
![]() |
|
Checked out
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On a beach
Posts: 10,127
|
A 4600 lb, gas guzzling, 4 passenger 4 door sedan that does 0-60 in 4.5 seconds and 180 mph isn't very functional in the US.
Or, not any more functional than say a BMW 550i or MB E550, etc. (or other far less expensive 4 door sedans). And have you seen the interior, with it's million little switches as dictated by the marketing dept.? Arguing that a Panamera Turbo is a "form follows function" vehicle is laughable. It's a big, fat, overweight and overpriced gold chain on wheels. |
||
![]() |
|