Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Deporting our American Values (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/555311-deporting-our-american-values.html)

McLovin 07-26-2010 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nostatic (Post 5474446)
OK. Lot's of businesses out there, how do we choose which to audit first? The one with lots of brown skinned employees?

Same way the IRS etc. decides how to audit.

I'd start with the industries you identified as being the greatest offenders. Randomly do a bunch of them.

nostatic 07-26-2010 06:05 PM

And what are the penalties?

McLovin 07-26-2010 06:08 PM

Mucho dinero, indexed to the companies profits. Increasingly severely for repeat offenders.

nostatic 07-26-2010 06:09 PM

Why not jail time? They are directly aiding and abetting the destruction of the country (per people here). Those fines are just going to come out of consumer pockets eventually.

Red88Carrera 07-26-2010 06:10 PM

Money just comes out of the company's bottom line. You need to hit the decision/policy makers with prison time. That way it's much more personal and they'll think twice about it.

McLovin 07-26-2010 06:13 PM

I'd be ok with that too.

Rick Lee 07-26-2010 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nostatic (Post 5474446)
OK. Lot's of businesses out there, how do we choose which to audit first? The one with lots of brown skinned employees?

Get real. We start by going after the ones using bogus SS numbers. That's a crime in itself, it's very easy to track and it's the main cottage industry for identity fraud. Clean up that racket, compel everyone to us eVerify and the problem would shrink exponentially, causing millions to self-deport. No need to even ask about race or nat. origin. You use a bogus SS number, your next job is on a chain gang for pennies an hour for several years and then a free ride back to the border.

McLovin 07-26-2010 06:16 PM

Local govts can take guys away from their multi week strip club/prostitution "undercover sting" operations to help out!

Shaun @ Tru6 07-26-2010 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McLovin (Post 5474468)
Mucho dinero, indexed to the companies profits. Increasingly severely for repeat offenders.


shareholders responsible for corporate management actions?

no.

management goes to jail.

simple.

McLovin 07-26-2010 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick Lee (Post 5474490)
Get real. We start by going after the ones using bogus SS numbers. That's a crime in itself, it's very easy to track and it's the main cottage industry for identity fraud. Clean up that racket, compel everyone to us eVerify and the problem would shrink exponentially, causing millions to self-deport. No need to even ask about race or nat. origin. You use a bogus SS number, your next job is on a chain gang for pennies an hour for several years and then a free ride back to the border.

Yeah, there's lot of ways to effectively enforce the labor laws against these businesses.

It's a weird position many take. When you mention enforcing the laws against illegals you get things like "it seems awfully strange that few focus on business complicity in the illegal issue" and "The 800lb elephant that isn't being addressed here are the big businesses that profit from the cheap illegal labor.."

Then when you say to enforce the labor/immigration laws against businesses who hire illegals, you get resistance to that, too, and a million reasons to not do so.

McLovin 07-26-2010 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun 84 Targa (Post 5474507)
shareholders responsible for corporate management actions?

No. At least not in any different way that shareholders ultimately pay (or profit) for any decisions corporate management makes.

nostatic 07-26-2010 06:24 PM

Well, I said to enforce them. And have penalties (jail time) suitable to the crime (hiring illegals = treason). I doubt you're going to get much support for that one.

Red88Carrera 07-26-2010 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nostatic (Post 5474520)
I doubt you're going to get much support for that one.

And there-in lies the real problem. Too many bleeding hearts in this country afraid of taking away so-called "civil rights". If you're here illegally, you have no civil rights!

McLovin 07-26-2010 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nostatic (Post 5474520)
Well, I said to enforce them. And have penalties (jail time) suitable to the crime (hiring illegals = treason). I doubt you're going to get much support for that one.

There apparently isn't much support for any enforcement of labor/immigration laws against businesses who are hiring all of these illegals.

stogie25 07-26-2010 06:45 PM

I don't see what these illegal immigrants (and I don't mean "displaced foreign travelers") ethics have in common with our grandparents, or great grandparents.

1. Our ancestors came here legally.

2. Our ancestors were proud to be Americans. They adopted American traditions did not expect America to cater to them.

3. Our ancestors learned the language of our country. They did not expect America to change to their languages.

If we were not supporting our own citizens who are too lazy to work, they would do the jobs that these illegals are doing because doing a ****ty underpaid job beats being homeless and hungry.

Jim Richards 07-27-2010 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McLovin (Post 5474508)
Then when you say to enforce the labor/immigration laws against businesses who hire illegals, you get resistance to that, too, and a million reasons to not do so.

Strange isn't it? IMO, you have to go after both the illegals and the businesses that hire them.

Superman 07-27-2010 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McLovin (Post 5474372)
Also, would you, as a pathetic liberal, be in favor of law enforcement checking in with the HR depts of these garment, ag, restaurant, bizs to make sure their employee paperwork is in order?

Absolutely! In my line of work (enforcing labor law), it is VERY frustrating to notice that laws protecting workers take a distant back seat to laws (absence thereof)promoting commerce and profits. In America, Freedom of Commerce is our most cherished value. America attempts to build fences on the Mexican border, even though that is MASSIVELY expensive and unlikely to prevent entry because the alternative (which would be FAR more effective) is unthinkable. It is unthinkable that we would require Business to play a meaningful role, for at least two reasons (excuses). First, it would cost them staff time. Second, it would eliminate the workers they like the best. Immigrants work harder than American citizens, and they require far less pay.

And for those of you who appear to believe our Mexican guests are lazy, how 'bout you come up here for the fruit harvests in the Yakima area. Work along side those brown-faced families in triple-digit temps. It has been tried before, and those people are super-human in terms of their physical ability to delivery production in those conditions.

But anyway, the real theme of this particular post is to communication my longstanding professional battle with the forces of commerce, at the legislative and the administrative government level, to pursue the protection of workers. Cheating workers is a side-benefit in the construction industry. A gentleman's game. A fun and entertaining and lucrative practice that almost never gets caught, and the penalties are laughable. When the subject comes up at the legislative branch, the Business Lobby absolutely CRUSHES any and all regulations like this (immigration). The fact remains that illegals come here for the money. For the jobs. And that works nicely for Business. And that is why we're wasting colossal money building silly fences that will not impact the inflow of cheap labor.

Superman 07-27-2010 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McLovin (Post 5474540)
There apparently isn't much support for any enforcement of labor/immigration laws against businesses who are hiring all of these illegals.

This is exactly correct.

Tobra 07-27-2010 12:22 PM

I suspect, truth be told, we all agree more than we disagree. I would hope that the unions would be strongly opposed to illegal immigration. I have spent my time digging ditches, washing dishes and doing landscaping as a youth. I went to school, got an education and moved on. Of course, I already spoke English. My best friends wife came on a student visa, learned English, got married and is now a tax paying citizen. Her brothers are illegal aliens, and she is none too happy with them, and their non-English speaking kids. It was funny to see little 4'10'' Claudia going after her her 6'2" brother when he said the wrong thing about her kids not speaking Spanish well enough.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red88Carrera (Post 5474453)
There's much more incentive for companies not to check for illegals than there is for them to do a simple verification. What we need is much harsher penalties for company brass that allows/encourages it to happen. Not just monetary fines, but serious prison time.

This, lock them up.

Todd, I knew you were kidding, I was being a bit facetious myself.

tabs 07-27-2010 01:19 PM

All things being equal why do Corps/business hire illegals in the first place...U Boyz seem to agree that it is because they provide cheap labour. That means that native American labour is OVER PRICED. That means that U boyz are OVERPAID. Welcome to reality, Your not worth what your being paid, and business has known that for decades and has been moving off shore as a result of that reality. .

Further your not going to be able to maintain this fiction much longer...Middle Class..your all fking peasants as far as I can see...to ignorant to know your being led to the slaughter.

Jim Richards 07-27-2010 01:26 PM

Alternatively, it means American labor is undervalued by businesses. The new reality is that nobody will be able to buy sheet except the business owners. I wonder if they constitute significant volume.

Scuba Steve 07-27-2010 01:47 PM

Quote:

And for those of you who appear to believe our Mexican guests are lazy, how 'bout you come up here for the fruit harvests in the Yakima area. Work along side those brown-faced families in triple-digit temps. It has been tried before, and those people are super-human in terms of their physical ability to delivery production in those conditions.
Alternatively, feel free to come on down to El Paso or Southern Arizona to see the other side of the issue.

tabs 07-27-2010 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Richards (Post 5475910)
Alternatively, it means American labor is undervalued by businesses. The new reality is that nobody will be able to buy sheet except the business owners. I wonder if they constitute significant volume.

By "undervalued" you mean that it is the wage structure that allows business to have ready and willing customers with cash or credit cards in their pockets to purchase their products. Yep...and Nope to the respective questions.

However there are whole new markets developing for the cheap stuff they are going to produce..

Superman 07-27-2010 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobra (Post 5475777)
I suspect, truth be told, we all agree more than we disagree. I would hope that the unions would be strongly opposed to illegal immigration.

Yup. With all due respect to rampant political mythology, the unions I work with were unanimously and vigorously opposed to even the legal inflow as provided in NAFTA. Building trades unemployment is conservatively estimated at 30% right now, in the relatively robust economy of Seattle, WA. Their position (my local Seattle bldg trades unions) is that OUR jobs are for OUR people.

Superman 07-27-2010 02:13 PM

Mr. Richards apparently shares my concern. America stays strong as long as ordinary Americans are at least minimally affluent consumers. Absent that, America probably crumbles. And quite frankly, America's international corporations don't necessarily have to care about that. Many of them would be (are) happy to prepare to shift their production and sales efforts elsewhere. There is legal and illegal. Good and bad. Right and wrong. Lucrative and non-lucrative. Commerce cares about the first pair and the last, and could give a flying you-know-what about the two middle pairs.

Danimal16 07-27-2010 02:13 PM

First of all the illegals are not immigrants, they are illegals as in criminals. The 800 pound gorrilla in the writting is the fact, the cold, irrefutable bloody fact that they have no respect for the rule of law. The rule of law is the very basis, the rock on which this nation was built. Without that they are nothing more than opportunistic criminals.

If they come to this country as a true immigrant, well bring them on, everyone!! Just like the other waves of immigrants before them. If they come as guest workers (which we have no program to protect them) bring them on. But most of all respect the law. They are illegals, criminals, they take from others and degrade the conditions of other citizens and legal immigrants. They cut in line and reduce the standard of the society in many ways.

Don't get me started.

Superman 07-27-2010 02:28 PM

I agree with you, Dan. And I notice something about the application of your value in American society.......it only applies 'sort of.' Americans are renowned rule-breakers. When was the last time you saw somebody driving the speed limit?

Remember the story about the couple who jaywalked in a small German town, against a red light, because there were no cars in sight? The German citizens looking on gasped audibly. The transgressor, a Pelicanhead, reported this on this very forum, and several other Pelicanheads quickly reported that German citizens are obedient. Americans are NOT. Here comes the best part: A Pelicanhead proposed that if US Congress and German Congress both passed a law creating a 10 mph speed limit, the two nations' citizenry would react differently. German drivers would drive 10mph until the next election, whereupon those Congress persons would be defeated and the incoming would repeal the law. In America, drivers would continue driving 75 mph, then re-elect the bastids that passed the silly law.

The same works in commerce in America. All's fair in love, war and commerce. Only the most unlucky of the most serious transgressors are ever brought anywhere near justice. If it makes money, and hurts a few people, those people are simple casualties in the very fun game of American commerce. Illegals are GREAT fun to employ. They don't even expect minimum wage, forget overtime, they keep their heads down and work hard and if they threaten to revolt, the employer drops an anonymous tip off to INS and deportation occurs. This teaches the remaining workers a lesson about obedience. And don't tell me this doesn't happen. I have watched it happen.

Jim Richards 07-27-2010 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tabs (Post 5475968)
However there are whole new markets developing for the cheap stuff they are going to produce..

For just how long?

Danimal16 07-27-2010 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superman (Post 5476025)
I agree with you, Dan. And I notice something about the application of your value in American society.......it only applies 'sort of.' Americans are renowned rule-breakers. When was the last time you saw somebody driving the speed limit?

Remember the story about the couple who jaywalked in a small German town, against a red light, because there were no cars in sight? The German citizens looking on gasped audibly. The transgressor, a Pelicanhead, reported this on this very forum, and several other Pelicanheads quickly reported that German citizens are obedient. Americans are NOT. Here comes the best part: A Pelicanhead proposed that if US Congress and German Congress both passed a law creating a 10 mph speed limit, the two nations' citizenry would react differently. German drivers would drive 10mph until the next election, whereupon those Congress persons would be defeated and the incoming would repeal the law. In America, drivers would continue driving 75 mph, then re-elect the bastids that passed the silly law.

The same works in commerce in America. All's fair in love, war and commerce. Only the most unlucky of the most serious transgressors are ever brought anywhere near justice. If it makes money, and hurts a few people, those people are simple casualties in the very fun game of American commerce. Illegals are GREAT fun to employ. They don't even expect minimum wage, forget overtime, they keep their heads down and work hard and if they threaten to revolt, the employer drops an anonymous tip off to INS and deportation occurs. This teaches the remaining workers a lesson about obedience. And don't tell me this doesn't happen. I have watched it happen.

Very true. Even Americans have a threshold level, that is what frustrates me so much. I don't mind legal immigrants (which most of some time or another were) come here and break the speed limit as long as they validate that they are with being an American. Guest workers get the same privilege and RESPECT as it shows not only their values but affirms ours.

And yes we are a rather rebellious lot.

Shaun @ Tru6 07-29-2010 01:29 AM

sub'd

widebody911 07-29-2010 05:20 AM

My first problem with the illegals is their refusal to integrate. I don't know why, but somebody is telling them they don't have to, and that the rest of the country will bend to suit their needs. Unfortunately, it's true. Various state agencies felt the need to provide Spanish-language services, and businesses thought they were being 'market savvy' by providing advertising and customer service in Spanish.

Let's say I decided to move to Russia - legally or illegally - to live and work there. I would keep my head down, do my best to speak Russian, and generally try not to make an ass of myself. I would not be protesting in the streets, waving an American flag, demanding that the Russians give me stuff (medical care, welfare, etc).

My second problem is, well, they're here illegally.

Jim Richards 07-29-2010 05:33 AM

Yep. Press 1 for English. Press 2 for ICE.

Tobra 07-29-2010 07:00 AM

Supes, I am dubious about your assertion. The purple shirts(SEIU) are protesting the AZ law in the streets. Those are potential new members and new Democratic voters.

Rick Lee 07-29-2010 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by widebody911 (Post 5478600)
Let's say I decided to move to Russia - legally or illegally - to live and work there. I would keep my head down, do my best to speak Russian, and generally try not to make an ass of myself. I would not be protesting in the streets, waving an American flag, demanding that the Russians give me stuff (medical care, welfare, etc).

And you'd do well there for it. Unlike Americans, other countries' people are not saddled by some compulsion to be loved or feel guilty. We like to call ourselves compassionate or generous, but it's really a gross sense of narcisissm, longing for love and bewilderment at how the rest of the world doesn't see things the way we do. Mexicans come here with a sense of entitlement because they are rewarded for it. They have no shortage of apologists, defenders and even lobbyists who will do whatever it takes to make them appear and remain victims. That only exists in America.

7Heaven 07-29-2010 09:08 AM

Why they have, to a large extent, failed to prosper like the asians is a good question. But that they have failed to do so isn't really at issue

Your writting is pretty good until I read your statement on the top.
You failed to realized working industriously is not the only attributes to make you successful.
You failed to recognized that values and education contributes to the stability and success
of Asian community (which the Mexican don't have).
I know, I'm Asian.

kach22i 07-29-2010 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moses (Post 5473402)
Nice vignette. Wrong immigrants.

Pretty sure you should have been talking about Asian immigrants.

Around here substitute Arab immigrants and mosque for church and could say nearly the same.

Superman 07-29-2010 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobra (Post 5478746)
Supes, I am dubious about your assertion. The purple shirts(SEIU) are protesting the AZ law in the streets. Those are potential new members and new Democratic voters.

I appreciate your respectful post.

When I speak of my experiences with Labor, I am generally speaking only opf "building trades" unions. They are different. Very different. They comprise a fairly large block within the broader Labor community, and their influence is substantial for a variety of reasons, but they do not necessarily speak for all of Labor. Indeed, the differences between their (building trades unions) perspective and those of other Labor organizations is often striking and occasionally amusing. Some of my building trades colleagues refer to the broader Labor Council meetings as the "nut and raisin show."

The unique perspective of building trades labor unions is complex and I will not provide an outline here, but a couple of obervations might help you guess accurately at some of that. First, building trades unions are today's modern evolution of the exclusive and even secretive "guilds" of the Middle Ages. Like the Masons. Second, building trades jobs carry fairly attractive wage and benefit packages. Thirdly, construction site jobs cannot be outsourced. And finally, every single building trade is a full-on career profession. It takes a good four years just to complete an apprenticeship program, and ongoing education is the rule rather than the exception. It takes a GREAT deal of skill to build things efficiently and effective. And there is one more important aspect. These guys are in physical danger throughout their entire work day. Every day. Their colleagues are maimed and killed not infrequently. Laziness can get people killed. Stoopid decisions on construction sites are not tolerated. Not by management, and certainly not by rank-and-file. They are "industrial athletes."

So no, they are not anxious to accept any Tom, Dick or Jose' into their fraternity.

Rikao4 07-29-2010 11:10 AM

it's over..
we don't have the will/or courage to do what needs to be done..
the horse is on one knee already..
sadly no-one will shoot it..
get it over with..and move on..
the wolves are putting on napkins...
US for dinner...
glad I'm old..
need to work on not giving a fk..
tired of taking Pepcid..

Rika

Shaun @ Tru6 08-05-2010 02:42 PM

I am optimistic about the future of our country.

Jim Richards 08-05-2010 02:43 PM

me too.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.