Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Experience with Vibram Fivefingers? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/576764-experience-vibram-fivefingers.html)

JavaBrewer 11-23-2010 10:59 AM

Experience with Vibram Fivefingers?
 
Specifically for running. Anyone have experience with the Vibram Fivefingers?

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1290542266.jpg

The other day at the local college track there were a couple sprinters out there sporting these. A buddy of mine (same age late 40's) just picked up a pair and was told to build miles slowly. I have typical aches/pains in legs from running but the worst is my lower back. I currently run 2.5 miles 2x a week. The college track has a nice rubberized coating that I can actually feel is softer than pavement. Lots of back pain the day after I run which is resolved with stretching, cycling, and some inversion table time (at the gym). Wondering if these will make it worse...or perhaps better over time...as advertised.

911boost 11-23-2010 11:03 AM

My friend is like you, and all I know is that it didn't help him out at all. His aches just moved to other places, pretty much worse than they were before.

dhoward 11-23-2010 11:09 AM

That looks ghey.
Just sayin'...

porsche4life 11-23-2010 11:11 AM

I don't buy into them either.....

Now if they would make them in a really sticky rubber for climbing.....

Joe Ricard 11-23-2010 11:12 AM

and you need special socks too???
Damn, I've been out of running for too long. They went and re-invented the shoe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AFC-911 11-23-2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porsche4life (Post 5689452)
I don't buy into them either.....

Now if they would make them in a really sticky rubber for climbing.....

A sticky Vibram Fivefingers? That just doesn't sound right! Hahaha!

syncroid 11-23-2010 11:27 AM

One of my sisters who is a marathoner uses them for training. She loves them but says there is definitely a learning curve with them.

The Gaijin 11-23-2010 11:57 AM

There is a movement away from squishy shoes for running/working out - and back to what the Good Lord gave us. That being two feet. For a long, long time people have been running, thick running shoes are a fairly new invention.

I think the whole idea is to give you a natural posture - while protecting your feet from modern hazards like glass. While running, you have less of a heal strike + pull motion, and more of a lean forward, push off the front of your feet action.. They teach classes in this stuff - I am serious!

They are very popular at my gym. Also, better for weightlifting than thick sneakers (although dedicated shoes are best) and very light for box jumps, pull ups and stuff like that. People swear by them.

89911 11-23-2010 12:07 PM

I own a pair and have yet to run in them. I really do believe that the running stride using the heel strike is wrong. That being said, I don't think at my age I want to reinvent running.

goat 11-23-2010 12:44 PM

Wife has a few pairs.
You really have to be careful when you use them muscles that have not really been used for a long time will be used. She started running in them and overdid it, she had to layoff the running for a few weeks.
Being in public with them? No problem, but some do.

kjb 11-23-2010 01:02 PM

After wearing dress shoes at work all week, it's really comfortable to slip into the vibram fivefingers on the weekends. It's like walking barefoot with some protection against glass and other things you don't want to step in or on.

I also run in them and can affirm that you want to build miles slowly. You end up using muscles in your feet and calves that do not get much exercise in regular shoes. It's not just moving from heel-strike to a mid- or forefoot strike: the lack of a tapered sole (thick at heel, thin at toes) allows the heel to drop lower mid-stride.

Running in fivefingers (and some barefoot) has given me a much better posture and made me a more efficient runner. Most of my miles are still in regular shoes, but I've moved from shoes at the supportive end of the spectrum to marathon racing flats.

/ J

masraum 11-23-2010 02:43 PM

Weird, I'd never heard of these until last night when I randomly happened upon them on the campmor.com site while looking for some new sunglasses.

Here's an interesting article about running barefoot.

Running Barefoot Blunts Foot

Quote:

...A study of people who habitually run barefoot shows that these runners’ feet strike the ground in a way that tempers impact forces and smoothes the running movement, a study appearing online January 27 in Nature finds....

Although the results suggest that barefoot running might have benefits, it’s too early to say whether this running style is less likely to cause injuries, the researchers say.

says study coauthor Daniel Lieberman of Harvard University. “From an evolutionary perspective, it’s normal and, if done properly, it is very fun and comfortable. We evolved to run barefoot.”

Earlier studies have suggested that people running barefoot land on the front or middle of the foot first, before lowering the heel and transitioning body weight to the back of the foot.

“This study is unique in that they actually went and found people who have been running barefoot and are world renowned as barefoot runners,” comments biomechanist Reed Ferber of the University of Calgary in Canada. Previous studies focused on people asked to run barefoot for the first time during laboratory experiments, he says.

In additional experiments conducted at Harvard, Lieberman’s team used a scale called a force plate to precisely measure force from running. The average initial impact force in habitually barefoot U.S. runners who land on the forefoot first is approximately one-third the force in shod U.S. runners who land on the heel, the researchers found. “A rear-foot strike is like someone hitting you on the foot with a hammer with about one and a half to three times your body weight. It would hurt without a shoe,” Lieberman says. “A forefoot strike is like having no one hit you at all.”

The team found that the ankles of these barefoot U.S. runners are more flexible than those of the heel-striking shoe wearers. That flexibility may be protective against stress injuries common in running. “The stiff landing hurts,” says Lieberman.

cantdrv55 11-23-2010 02:45 PM

My sis-in-law is a marathoner. Never had foot probs until she began wearing Vibram FFs exclusively. Now she is seeing a podiatrist for plantar faciatis (sp). Could just be a coincidence though?

DARISC 11-23-2010 02:58 PM

I bought a pair of black ones last year, mainly for the novelty (they look like gorilla feet :)) . You don't need socks. They take a bit of practice putting them on. It's like going barefoot. They're siped, like tires, and have great grip for sail boarding, rock climbing, etc.

Normy 11-23-2010 03:10 PM

I saw these in a shop last spring, and I was interested, but haven't bitten yet.

There is a book out there [cannot remember title or author] that talks about how modern running shoes cause a "heel strike" condition due to the built-up heel. This design was developed in order to protect the achilles tendon, but it leads to other problems.

If you watch a person run barefoot on grass you will see that we naturally revert to running on the balls of our feet, our heels barely touch down. They say that this is safer and more efficient, but I'm sure that if you started doing this, that you'd have to start slowly and cover short distances at first to avoid injury.

Foot/leg problems become a real-deal when you are past your 40th birthday, trust me. I finally found shoes that support my feet properly [Asics GEL Foundation], but about two years ago I developed plantar fascitis in both my feet and let me tell you, it wasn't a very jolly sensation! I might still try these, but if I do I think I'll try running on the beach at first.

N

DARISC 11-23-2010 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JavaBrewer (Post 5689434)
...the worst is my lower back...

Lemme guess; especially when running downhill?

You really, REALLY owe it to yourself to try an inversion table. Costco sells the Teeter brand for $300.

Had lower back pain develop from zero to really, REALLY bad over a year and a half, saw my doc and a physical therapist once, bought the table and in less than a month I was about back to normal.

All it takes is 3 to 5 min. a day; instant relief (only temporary at first) from the very first use - and I take 6 caps of MSM & Glucosamine Sulfate (NOT Glucosamine Chondroitin, unless you've got arthritis) which aids fluid and blood flow in joints. I try to remember to use it every day.

I don't think lower back pain generally goes away on its own, especially as we age, but it can be kept under control.

HardDrive 11-23-2010 05:06 PM

I bought some a couple months ago because my back has prevented me running for years. Well my back was fine, but they aggravated an achilles injury. They put tons of pressure on your ankles. I'm going to give my tendon time to heal up and try them again. Certainly worth a try if your back is preventing you from running. Just make sure you run on the balls of your feet and take it way slow at first. Your basically relearning how to run.

Noah930 11-23-2010 05:55 PM

No FHE, but there's a similar thread over on F-chat: vibram five fingers.... your thoughts please - FerrariChat.com

djmcmath 11-23-2010 06:26 PM

I was skeptic at first, too. I had a knee injury a few years ago, and really haven't been able to run since then. A friend pointed me to the Vibrams and I decided to give it a shot. I actually ran barefoot -- no shoes at all -- for about a month, before I decided to get the "shoes." It's been fantastic. I can actually run again. I've been making a 7 minute pace for better than two miles, which is not bad for a guy who's been out of it for a couple of years. My wife thinks they look ridiculous, but I don't care -- I can run again, and it feels great.

Caution: start slowly, don't hurt yourself. Your body doesn't know how to run like this, so break into it gently. You can do a lot of damage by pushing too hard, so don't. Run, enjoy, and stop hurting.

Side note -- I've only had to deal with customer service once with Vibram, but it was great. Very friendly, very helpful.

So my endorsement is positive, all around.

Dan

Tobra 11-23-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cantdrv55 (Post 5689835)
My sis-in-law is a marathoner. Never had foot probs until she began wearing Vibram FFs exclusively. Now she is seeing a podiatrist for plantar faciatis (sp). Could just be a coincidence though?

There is no coincidence.

Fore foot strike puts more strain on plantar fascia and it would not surprise me at all to see fasciitis, particularly if they just switched, or increased mileage or pace recently. I would not think you could do real high miles in the toe shoes though. Would be rough on your calves, or could be. Definitely want to work hard on flexibility if you are trying the barefoot thing.

With a more standard sort of running shoe, you can keep a lot of the stress on the bone and off the soft tissue. Bone is pretty strong stuff, and the heel to toe gait is easier to do when you are fatigued.

dhoward 11-23-2010 07:57 PM

Did I say they were ghey?

aigel 11-23-2010 11:15 PM

We already talked about these. See my comments on them in this thread.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/488794-any-distance-fun-runners-wearing-vibram-five-fingers.html
The highlight (aside from my comments of course!) was this new shoe:

George

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1249144415.jpg

djmcmath 11-24-2010 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobra (Post 5690292)
I would not think you could do real high miles in the toe shoes though. Would be rough on your calves, or could be. Definitely want to work hard on flexibility if you are trying the barefoot thing.

Absolutely true -- my calves are not the weak little things they once were. My first couple of months doing this were very hard on my calves. I've pulled through that now, though, and my calves are solidly built. Plantar fasciitis (sp?) is a problem that I was warned about, though the word on the street is that if you (a) build miles slowly and (b) pay attention to the warning signs that your feet give you and back off accordingly, it shouldn't be a problem. I sometimes get foot pain, but I back off for a couple of days, stretch out my feet really well, and I'm back at it no problems.

I'm pretty sure there are solid examples of people who have done a lot of long distance barefoot (or minimalist). In fact, let's face it -- everyone who did any running before about 1960 did it without the benefit of a modern shoe. Pheidippides, who ran back to Athens and yelled "Nike" (or whatever it was he actually said) before dying did it without arch support. Our ancestors, who ran animals to death on the plains, did it without heel padding. The elite runners of the world, the Kenyans, run barefoot. There is still a hundred mile mountain endurance race in Mexico run by people who wear home-made sandals made from recycled tires.

Given the thousands of years of human history that didn't involve the modern running shoe, it seems that there is at least reason for investigation before dismissal.

Dan

jyl 11-24-2010 04:32 AM

How are they different from track flats, watersports shoes, or any other shoe with minimal soles? Do the individual toes actually make a difference?

89911 11-24-2010 05:26 AM

The biggest difference is that they allow your individual toes the ability to grab and aid in the stride, giving you extra traction and gate length. This is where your calves, or lack of development like mine, come into play. Like I mentioned, I have a pair up in my closet that I have been figuring out when I want to use them. I run about 15-20 miles a week and don't want to go through a 2-3 month relearning curve on how I run. I see nothing wrong with any of the theory and I do think that it does promote a better, safer running stride. One only needs to look at many of the African runners or other countries that don't have "The Finish Line" and how they learned to run when children when no athletic shoes were available. Many there are also running well into old age. I am relatively sure all animals run on their forefronts other then man.

cstreit 11-24-2010 09:11 AM

Reading the title of this thread, I expected VERY different content... :)

Burnin' oil 11-24-2010 09:26 AM

There's a dude that in NorCal that does long trail runs in flip flops. Damn hippy.

JavaBrewer 11-24-2010 10:00 AM

Agreed with concern for calf muscles. Many many years ago I did a lot of running on the beach barefoot. Loved it. This summer I did a spontaneous 2 mile run on the beach barefoot and was a hobbling mess - felt like I tore both calf muscles. It took a good 2 months before they healed enough for me to run normally (w/shoes) again.

I'm gonna put these things on my Christmas list and start really slow - like walking a couple laps - and transition to short distance jogging and see how it goes.

Thanks for the input guys.

Geronimo '74 11-24-2010 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porsche4life (Post 5689452)
I don't buy into them either.....

Now if they would make them in a really sticky rubber for climbing.....

The KSO and the SPRINT are suitable for climbing and bouldering....
Dunno if they're as good as regular climbing shoes tho.

VINMAN 11-24-2010 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porsche4life (Post 5689452)
I don't buy into them either.....

Now if they would make them in a really sticky rubber for climbing.....


Id hate to have to do a toe-jam with those! OUCH!

dan88911 11-24-2010 06:51 PM

Yeah I have a pair. I have not tried to run /jog with them. I can't afford any more back or knee discomfort than what I get wearing the running shoes. However, I cross train skipping rope and calisthenics in them.

djmcmath 11-25-2010 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jyl (Post 5690648)
How are they different from track flats, watersports shoes, or any other shoe with minimal soles? Do the individual toes actually make a difference?

Good question. The track flats that I ran with were never quite flat, and still encouraged a heel-first landing. The VFF won't let you land on your heel, hurts like heck. As I understand it, these were first built as watersports shoes -- kayaking, canoeing, and the like. I've never tried running in other watersports shoes, so I don't know.

As far as the toes go, I'd say that it does matter, but I'm not 100% sure of why. I do know that if I run in my old running shoes -- even if I run with the same form as I do in the Vibrams -- my feet hurt really bad afterward.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JavaBrewer
Agreed with concern for calf muscles. Many many years ago I did a lot of running on the beach barefoot. Loved it. This summer I did a spontaneous 2 mile run on the beach barefoot and was a hobbling mess - felt like I tore both calf muscles. It took a good 2 months before they healed enough for me to run normally (w/shoes) again.

I'm gonna put these things on my Christmas list and start really slow - like walking a couple laps - and transition to short distance jogging and see how it goes.

My first run, I went crazy, too. I did 2 miles and it took me a week to recover. I drank a lot of milk, ate a lot of bananas, and felt like I recovered pretty quick. It was muscle pain, not joint pain, you know?

It's all about starting slow: jog a few hundred yards, then a little farther. A friend and I started down this path together, and for each of us, it was "I made it to the stump 10 feet past the half-mile mark," or "I pushed just a little farther today, made it to the big tree, just past the stump..." Start with VERY short distances, work your way up SLOWLY. Remember: you're re-teaching your body how to run.

:) Enjoy.

Dan

quaz 11-26-2010 03:33 AM

I have not used Vibram fives, but I have been running in Puma driving shoes. The sole allows me to feel the ground and I cannot heal strike. My problem was knee pain on and off for years while running. From what I understand when you land on your heel you have zero stability on your foot so your knees and legs have to stabilize you. When you land on the ball of your foot your foot and toes stabilize you taking the strain off your knees. However when you go to this style of running you have to change your form a little bit. Don't lean forward, instead keep your body straight and bend your knees slightly. You should almost not even feel or hear your feet strike when doing it correctly. Oh yeah and your calves will hurt like heck until you build them up again.

If you doubt that this is a proper way to run it is easy to demonstrate to yourself how you should be running. On a cold day take off your shoes and run a short distance on cold pavement. Do you strike your heal? Would you even try to strike your heal? How do you use the arch of your foot? Do you use the arch of your foot when heal striking? Why on earth would anyone think heal striking is a good idea?

Anyway, I have been slacking a bit this summer on running and did a higher mile run earlier this week. The next morning nothing hurt. That felt nice.........

Tobra 11-26-2010 11:15 AM

If you don't have the right sort of foot, you will have a more difficult time, to the point of being incapable of using them.

You can have a situation where you exert more force than a structure can take, the foot can break at the top of the arch, middle of the foot, ligaments and tendons break, or pull off a little piece of bone, the tendon can attenuate or stretch out, akin to a pair of socks that lose(loose) their elastic and won't stay up. Have seen injuries to Achilles tendon at back of ankle, posterior tibial tendon at inside of ankle, peroneus brevis at outside of ankle in people trying the barefoot thing. Seen a few stress fractures too. It helps to do proprioception/range of motion excercises to improve your abillity to know position of foot and strengthen muscles acting on foot and ankle. Spelling the alphabet out using your big toe or doing circles, getting one of those big rubber band type things can be handy too.

azasadny 11-26-2010 01:19 PM

My BIL wears those crazy looking things and he loves them. He's a marathon runner and he claims they're the best...

JavaBrewer 08-03-2011 02:17 PM

As usual it has taken me 6+ months to research and finally pull the trigger...:( A good friend of mine (same age and ailments) recently contacted me with an outstanding 6 month review so I said to myself it was finally time to get off the fence.

I went with the standard black KSO (keep stuff out) model as I intend to wear these around the house, running errands, going to the gym, and of course running - which happens on the local CSUSM track that has a sweet rubberized surface. I could not pull the trigger on the brightly colored Vibram options just yet... Despite the basic black my wife informed me today that I now a card carrying member of the dork club...;)

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1312409442.jpg

Sizing is smaller - I wear a 10.5 US shoe and was fitted with a 41 Euro. I have been working on the natural running method over the last month or so and work in a couple laps barefoot as well. Definite muscle tenderness in the calves and ankle area but it's getting better. I will report back after another couple months in the VFF.

jyl 08-03-2011 05:04 PM

Hey, just in time for Planet Of The Apes 2011!

fuelie600 08-03-2011 05:11 PM

My 14yo son wears them. They sure do stink after a few days! Just sayin....

I tried a pair of Merrell Trail Gloves yesterday. Was going to use them as water/camp shoes when backpacking. Didn't like the way they fit my feet. Nice looking barefoot shoe though.

porsche4life 08-03-2011 06:00 PM

For a camp shoe, check out a pair of Sanuks... I love mine, and they stuff in my backpack nicely.

fuelie600 08-04-2011 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porsche4life (Post 6175631)
check out a pair of Sanuks...

I'll give them a look. Thx.

I usually take a pair of felt bottom water shoes for slippery stream crossings or Keen waterproof sandals for general comfort. Leaving Saturday for Isle Royale. Not sure which pair will be in my pack yet. Probably the water shoes, since I'll be wading as I chase 40+ inch northern pike......


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.