pwd72s |
04-09-2011 10:29 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by speeder
(Post 5952342)
I'm going to shock everyone and defend Paul. $65k was absolutely a buddy price for that car. It was a 6-figure car all day long, 8 ways from Sunday. If you don't believe it, you either don't know the car he had or the market for early 911Ss. It was one of the cleanest original '72 911Ss in the world, w/o a doubt.
Restored cars in lesser condition fetch $100k all the time. I saw a restored, (better than new), '73 911S coupe go for $80k in 1989. Fact.
I just don't get all the Mustang baiting/trolling/whatever you want to call it here. Mustangs are cool cars but in a different category than 911s, IMHO.
|
Coulda knocked me over with a feather! :)
Milt, you'd be surprised at the antics some people pulled while trying to place my car in their hands.
So, found anything comparable yet? You won't. A car can be restored several times, it's original only once. That alone makes my old car much better than the $95K fantasy junction car you linked to. New paint can hide flaws. Original paint doesn't.
So again, find a '72S coupe that hasn't been repainted, hasn't been wrecked, for less than $100K. Matter of fact, I'm guessing you won't find one at any price.
I guess the real bottom line is that Evren & I were both happy with the deal. Knowing, absolutely knowing, that no flippers were getting this car was very much worth the money I left on the table to me.
Denis? Have you driven a new Mustang lately? The new 5.0's are really tempting me...order with the 3:73 rear end and the Brembo brakes, you'd have a car that few who post here would be able to keep up with...the Laguna Seca version goes way beyond that. But if I ever got one of those, I would need to go to a good body shop before I'd drive it...get rid of the graphics, mainly.
I just wish Ford hadn't messed up like they did with the rear end change...much prefer the look of my '09 over the '10 & up.
|