![]() |
Z-man, i see (9+3) as 12, so 24*12 is 288
|
Passed it around my office
2 Phd in Engineering and physics = 2 4 Master of Mechanical Engineering = 2 5 BS in Engineering = 2 No one got 288 |
which means absolutely ... Eff all if they aren't here to discuss it and/or explain their result..
|
Quote:
|
It's really quite simple
÷ or / means exactly the same , devide the first number, by the second one. multiplying or devision has the same priority anything between ( ) goes first When no other priorities remain, go left to right so 48/2*(9+3) = 48/2*12 and 48/2*12 = 24*12 = 288 |
Quote:
48 ______ 2(9+3) But 99 of 100 people seeing that will say the answer is 2. |
Quote:
48 divided by 2 times (12) does not imply that the 12 is somehow attached to the 2. Actually, yes, once the math inside () is done, you can drop them because they don't mean/do/change anything any more. the question is easy to read as 48/(2(9+3)), but that's NOT what is written, or what 48 divided by 2 times (9+3) I've had a lot of math. Tons of it. Maybe not as much as some of you, but probably more than most. I just don't see how we can still be discussing this. It's pretty much black and white. When I first looked at the problem, I did the same thing that lots of other folks have done. "That's written really weird, the person must have meant 48/(2(9+3))". But that is absolutely not how it's written. Based on the order of operations, the answer is 288. As has been stated, it's poorly written. Part of the problem is written like grade school math, and part of the problem is written the way it would be written in algebra or calculus. The two really don't mix well. As I see it, there are two ways to do the problem, the way it's written (the right way) that gives the answer 288 and the way that you ASS-U-ME the person writing it meant for it to be done (the wrong way unless you can ask the person to clarify and confirm) and that way gives the answer 2. |
Guys variables placed together or next to parenthesis as opposed to using the "x" means the term are one element and supersede normal order.
Once you solve inside the () ,the () doesn't go way you. You still have to solve 2() before dividing into 48 to satisfy the order of operations. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The problem is like I said before, your wife, because she knows math so well, is assuming things based on a poorly written problem. The 2(9+3) is not in parentheses, so there is no reason to put both terms under the line as your wife did. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
When you get like that, you do a lot of this ASS-U-ME because you ASSuME that everyone else is an idiot and you know better. |
Quote:
Or to put it differently: 48/2 = 24. So wouldn't it follow that it can be 24 * 12? -Z |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
This 48 ______ 2(9+3) is the same as 48/(2(9+3)) but is not the same as 48/2(9+3) |
My old buddy Heisenburg says the answer is 2 and 288 AT THE SAME TIME...........
|
Quote:
A B with a keyboard. Thus it's the same. ;) |
Enormous chocolate eclairs at the Summit Store on Skyline Blvd- get 'em while you canSmileWavy
|
Krikey!
Konsider the katatastrophic 'kumulation of killed kittens yer kausing! It's kreepy! Kan't we just kurtail this krap? 'K? It's Krystal klear, fer kryin' out loud! - 288. Kurrent kitten karnage: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1302553312.jpg |
Quote:
http://media2.px.yelpcdn.com/bphoto/...Vox_u1JyHTvQ/l Speaking of math, for extra credit figure out the ratio of creamy goodness conversion to cellulite. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website