Originally Posted by Joeaksa (Post 5994959)

You did not miss anything. I have a copy of the photo that was posted that got Byron banned and you can see worse in Time magazine. It is NOT nudity IMHO...

Jeez you guys have a lot of time on your hands. Go play with the cat or something! :)

Originally Posted by sammyg2 (Post 5995970)

"stoopid is as stoopid does"
Forest gump

he knows the rules.

Originally Posted by Joeaksa (Post 5994959)

Jeez you guys have a lot of time on your hands.

Originally Posted by sammyg2 (Post 5995970)

"stoopid is as stoopid does"

Originally Posted by Joeaksa (Post 5995995)

...How about when you are the one who is banned for "not breaking the rules" my friend?

Originally Posted by Joeaksa (Post 5995995)

Sammy,

Correct but the problem is that he did not break the rules! The moderator evidently cannot see very well it seems and thought that the titties were bare which they are NOT!

I have now sent the photo in question to over 20 people and every one of them said the nipples were covered and there was no more nudity than you could see at any swimming pool.

So you feel its ok to ban someone when they do not break the rules? How about when you are the one who is banned for "not breaking the rules" my friend?

Joe A

Originally Posted by sammyg2 (Post 5996067)

Your opinion, affected as it may be by your disagreement with the rules, means nothing in this case. You are not a moderator.
The moderators make those decisions, not us. You don't like the rules, fine. But it was overtly obvious to most when byron posted that picture that he was severely testing the rules, pushing the limit, seeing how much he could get away with. Push the limits, test the rules, and there's a good chance you will not like the outcome.
Not smart and not excusable.
That's why most of us don't test the limits, we don't challenge the moderators, we don't push our luck.

I have never been banned, I have never been threatened with banning, because I have enough of a clue NOT to post pictures that might be determined to be beyond PG.
Why is that so hard for people to grasp?

The inmates do not run this asylum, the moderators do. Wait what? ........

Well, except for calling them poopy-heads of course.

Originally Posted by Jferr006 (Post 7362755)

I love lamp.

Originally Posted by Jferr006 (Post 7362755)

I love lamp.

Originally Posted by speeder (Post 5987908)

It's been slipping for years but with nothing left but PWD and his Mustang trolling, Lubemaster starting a thread every time he has a decent bowel movement and Darisc's inexplicable, (but loud), blathering combined with endless boring discussions about fence posts and lawn mowers, I think I might be cured and ready to venture out into the real world. :cool:

Originally Posted by LubeMaster77 (Post 5988900)

I take offense to that! I will have you know that I make it a point to make sure I start a thread when I feel a bit bound out, have the Hershey squirts are have lava ass!

Save for this thread, the last decent thing I remember you contributing to was your opinion on the Northern Seven Years War, the protein binary complex theory for artificial RNA and the artificial intelligence used to study Gothic Cathedrals. Of course your examination of the balboa (100 centésimos) as the national unit of account for Panama with no use of paper monies and how that influences local purchasing practice was interesting but what was most riveting was your thread you started on your interpretation on the last words of Christ - the whole harmonization of the texts from each of the four canonical gospels had us all on the edge of our seats.

Yup, all and all your have been there for us - an inspiration, a soul searcher, a place for knowledge/compassion/reason.

I for one feel richer...

Originally Posted by LubeMaster77 (Post 7363696)

I'll have you know that my best work is done when I'm all bound up!