Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   How much does a cubic meter of air weigh? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/683359-how-much-does-cubic-meter-air-weigh.html)

scottbombedout 06-13-2012 03:49 AM

How much does a cubic meter of air weigh?
 
How much does a cubic meter of air weigh?

I know a big variation depending on temperature, atmospheric pressure and height above sea level?

However, best answer please....

Oh anyone know what volume of air is required to burn 1kg of wood. I know, depends on chipped, density of water in wood etc.

Someone help out a fellow pelican trying to work something out.....

Thanks
Scott

BK911 06-13-2012 03:59 AM

From a psych chart:
At 70F 40% humidity - 13.5 cu. ft. per lb dry air.

wdfifteen 06-13-2012 04:00 AM

1.184 kg. I looked it up. That is under standard laboratory conditions - 1 atm pressure and 25 degrees c.

pavulon 06-13-2012 04:03 AM

more than an un-laiden swallow.

id10t 06-13-2012 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pavulon (Post 6801683)
more than an un-laiden swallow.

European or African?

scottbombedout 06-13-2012 04:11 AM

Brilliant :D

Now how much air to burn 1kg of wood ;)

wdfifteen 06-13-2012 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottbombedout (Post 6801689)
Brilliant :D

Now how much air to burn 1kg of wood ;)

From this web site : Burning Wood for Heating

it looks like 1 kg of wood requires 14.2 kg of air, or about 12 cubic meters

MarkRobinson 06-13-2012 07:09 AM

is it not 14.7 x 27 = 396.9lbs? (at sea level)

Mark Henry 06-13-2012 07:16 AM

A big balloon can have over a cubic foot in it, how heavy is that?

1.184 kg is about 2-1/2lbs so that can't be right. Definitely not 396.9lbs.

Edit: sorry I thought it was foot not metre. The 1.184kg could be correct.

Tobra 06-13-2012 08:22 AM

The amount of air to burn a kg of wood will vary slightly with the type of wood, I would imagine.

Zeke 06-13-2012 08:27 AM

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

Depends on the wood and the air.

krystar 06-13-2012 08:29 AM

surely a wood stove wouldn't need an o2 sensor and a close loop DME controlling the air intake throttle body?

bell 06-13-2012 08:29 AM

red........no blue!

Superman 06-13-2012 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Henry (Post 6801898)
A big balloon can have over a cubic foot in it, how heavy is that?

1.184 kg is about 2-1/2lbs so that can't be right. Definitely not 396.9lbs.

Edit: sorry I thought it was foot not metre. The 1.184kg could be correct.

Interesting. If you filled a balloon with one cubic meter of air and put it on a scale, then subtracted the weight of the balloon, you'd have your answer. In terms of "weight."

At that point, I would begin to wonder whether the "mass" of the balloon would be different from its "weight."

Flieger 06-13-2012 11:05 AM

No, you would just have just the weight of the rubber assuming the air inside the balloon is the same density as outside. The bouyant force would cancel out the weight of the air, just like putting a water balloon in a pool.

To get mass you divide pounds by 32.174 ft/sev^2 and get slugs. To get mass from a metric scale just use the weight. It is confusing. Metric scales weigh in kilograms force, but kilograms is also a unit of mass. The SI system is a mass-length-time system but the British Gravitational or all those other silly unit systems we use are force-length-time. So we can have pounds force and pounds mass. If you are doing calcs with pounds mass just use the reading from the scale.

1 pound mass * 1 g = 1 pound force
1 slug * 1 g = 32.174 pounds force

scottbombedout 06-13-2012 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdfifteen (Post 6801724)
From this web site : Burning Wood for Heating

it looks like 1 kg of wood requires 14.2 kg of air, or about 12 cubic meters

Fantastic page, thanks. However my head is hurting.......

I am assuming the wood is perfectly dry, no excess air is required for the burning process and we are at sea level. So can you confirm for me.

To burn 1 metric tonne of wood (1000kg) requires 14,200kg of air (12,000cubic meters of air).

Does that include the fact that the wood already contains 43% oxygen?

Helpppppppppppppp

RWebb 06-13-2012 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pavulon (Post 6801683)
more than an un-laiden swallow.

you mean a virgin swallow???

RWebb 06-13-2012 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdfifteen (Post 6801724)
From this web site : Burning Wood for Heating

it looks like 1 kg of wood requires 14.2 kg of air, or about 12 cubic meters

you want to be near stoich on that, eh

pavulon 06-13-2012 03:53 PM

Does this wood float??? Ducks float...

nynor 06-13-2012 04:15 PM

um.... how much does it weigh, or how much mass does it have?

masraum 06-13-2012 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superman (Post 6802008)
Interesting. If you filled a balloon with one cubic meter of air and put it on a scale, then subtracted the weight of the balloon, you'd have your answer. In terms of "weight."

Only if it's a mylar balloon. Rubber balloons are elastic. Therefore they exert pressure on the air inside. To blow up a balloon, you have to have more air inside than the volume at the same conditions to actually expand the balloon which means that you have more air inside the balloon's space than you would have if the balloon wasn't there.

Superman 06-13-2012 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flieger (Post 6802229)
No, you would just have just the weight of the rubber assuming the air inside the balloon is the same density as outside.

If so, then one cubic yard of air has zero weight.

Superman 06-13-2012 06:41 PM

Okay, so if you filled a mylar baloon with air, at exactly one atmosphere of pressure, and if you set it on a scale and the scale read exactly the weight of the mylar baloon, then the air inside has no weight. It might have mass, but no weight.

Flieger 06-13-2012 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masraum (Post 6802922)
Only if it's a mylar balloon. Rubber balloons are elastic. Therefore they exert pressure on the air inside. To blow up a balloon, you have to have more air inside than the volume at the same conditions to actually expand the balloon which means that you have more air inside the balloon's space than you would have if the balloon wasn't there.

Good catch! I hadn't thought of that. So the air inside can't be at the same density.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superman (Post 6802932)
Okay, so if you filled a mylar baloon with air, at exactly one atmosphere of pressure, and if you set it on a scale and the scale read exactly the weight of the mylar baloon, then the air inside has no weight. It might have mass, but no weight.

The scale would read the weight of the air and balloon minus the buoyant force on the whole thing. That means the air inside the mylar balloon would have zero net weight and the weight of the rubber would be reduced by a tiny amount equal to the weight of a volume of air (same density as inside and locally outside the balloon) equal to the volume of the mylar.

slodave 06-13-2012 10:00 PM

I'll just add this in here for the heck of it.

At sea level, the standard atmosphere consists of a barometric pressure of 29.92 in. Hg. (1013.2 millibars) and a temperature of 15*C (59*F). This means that, under these standard conditions, the weight of a column of air at sea level will weigh 14.7 lb/inē.

RWebb 06-13-2012 10:30 PM

Dave, how much is that in Pascals?

slodave 06-13-2012 10:32 PM

Turbo Pascal?

slodave 06-13-2012 10:43 PM

I had to look things up. :)

101325 Pa

svandamme 06-14-2012 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superman (Post 6802008)
Interesting. If you filled a balloon with one cubic meter of air and put it on a scale, then subtracted the weight of the balloon, you'd have your answer. In terms of "weight."

At that point, I would begin to wonder whether the "mass" of the balloon would be different from its "weight."


Well no.. because the content of the balloon were already on the scale before you put the balloon with the air in it on the scale.. + you got all the weight of all the air above the balloon, still on the scale, on top of the balloon.


so in short, you can't weigh "air" with just a scale.

unless you first put the scale in a room that has been pulled vacuum..
and then you put your filled balloon in there.

Ideally you take a non elastic , box that is 1 square meter..
close that box at regular athmospheric pressure

Seal it
take it to a vacuum chamber
reset the scale to zero
put the box on the scale

weigh it

open the box
reset the vacuum in the room
weigh it again

subtract.

scottbombedout 06-14-2012 07:21 AM

Wouldn't the balloon explode?

Flieger 06-14-2012 11:15 AM

We did the vacuum thing in a measurement lab as a demonstration. Marshmallows get really big. We did not try balloons.

We had to measure the mass of diesel fuel we were going to combust in a bomb calorimeter and we had to correct for the bouyancy since we measured in ambient air and to get the mass more accurate. The scale also had a box around it to keep the air currents from causing noise in the measurement.

Jim Bremner 06-14-2012 11:33 AM

I'm sure that LA Smogair weights in more than say air from Idaho.

Hugh R 06-14-2012 01:08 PM

If you have a hummingbird in a box on a scale and the box weighs 10 grams and the bird weighs 10 grams, (total weight of 20 grams) and the hummingbird then takes off and hovers inside the box, what is the weight reading on the scale?

Jim Bremner 06-14-2012 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh R (Post 6804190)
If you have a hummingbird in a box on a scale and the box weighs 10 grams and the bird weighs 10 grams, (total weight of 20 grams) and the hummingbird then takes off and hovers inside the box, what is the weight reading on the scale?

10 grams. it took me a second to get the hummingbird into the box. I had to readjust my tare since my box weighted in heavier.

Hugh R 06-14-2012 01:52 PM

Uh, no. Waiting for other responses.

scottbombedout 06-14-2012 01:58 PM

The birds wings will create downward thrust equal to its own weight?

Rick V 06-14-2012 02:00 PM

Equal or greater than?

scottbombedout 06-14-2012 02:10 PM

Dunno Rick, I am still waiting to see if my original calculation should include the 43% oxygen present in the wood :D

Rick V 06-14-2012 02:31 PM

Nerd :D

RWebb 06-14-2012 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh R (Post 6804190)
If you have a hummingbird in a box on a scale and the box weighs 10 grams and the bird weighs 10 grams, (total weight of 20 grams) and the hummingbird then takes off and hovers inside the box, what is the weight reading on the scale?

Initially, it will be the wt. of the box plus the wt. of the increased pressure downward caused by the wing beats

Later on, it will be the wt. of the box + wt. of the hummingbird

Much later on, it will be the wt. of the box + the non-water wt. of the hummingbird


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.