Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Remember those protesters that got pepper sprayed? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/708420-remember-those-protesters-got-pepper-sprayed.html)

Joeaksa 09-27-2012 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porsche4life (Post 7000460)
And if they'd been protesting an abortion clinic or an Obama fund raiser?

Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't make them wrong

Funny thing, I learned years ago that you do not refuse an order by a cop. Doing so usually results in bad juju... and in my day and age you did not get loads of money afterwards, more like days/weeks/months in jail.

VINMAN 09-27-2012 08:59 AM

Exactly. A cop asks you to do move along, you do it. These punk college kids are all wannabe lawyers that "know their rights". Again, i still feel the cops overeacted with the pepper spray.

and yes I'll take a hit of OC for 30 gs, Alex. I'll even buy the can.

RWebb 09-27-2012 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cstreit (Post 6999997)
Good thing they weren't holding babies and reaching for cell phones... ...for that you get executed.

the pen is apparently not always mightier than the sword...



http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1348775164.jpg

gtc 10-24-2013 08:09 AM

Apparently spraying people with pepper spray is even more traumatic than being sprayed - the cop just got $38k in workers comp for his "suffering."

UC Davis pepper-spray officer awarded $38,000 - SFGate

TheMentat 10-24-2013 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gtc (Post 7720298)
Apparently spraying people with pepper spray is even more traumatic than being sprayed - the cop just got $38k in workers comp for his "suffering."

UC Davis pepper-spray officer awarded $38,000 - SFGate

I saw that yesterday... Unfrickinbelievable!

sammyg2 10-24-2013 08:34 AM

they deseve more pepper spray.

strupgolf 10-24-2013 09:00 AM

Who said police work doesn't pay.

Rusty Heap 10-24-2013 09:01 AM

Quote:

The $1 million will come from the university's General Liability Risk Program, a self-insured fund. Besides the $630,000 for the students, $100,000 is being set aside for claims from others who can prove they were sprayed during the incident.

In addition, $250,000 is going the ACLU, which represented the students"

speeder 10-24-2013 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gtc (Post 7720298)
Apparently spraying people with pepper spray is even more traumatic than being sprayed - the cop just got $38k in workers comp for his "suffering."

UC Davis pepper-spray officer awarded $38,000 - SFGate

That guy needs to be thrown into genpop at their county jail. :mad:

sammyg2 10-24-2013 09:45 AM

If I recall correctly, the cops told the protestors that they had to get off that sidewalk, and they said no. the cops told them that if they don't get off the sidewalk, they would get pepper-sprayed. the protestors said go ahead and spray us. One of them said please.

They wanted to get sprayed to make a statement. They got their wish. Now the stupidy of certain people rewarded these low-lifes with cash.

Why is it the dumbest people in the state are employed by the california university system and the 2nd dumbest attend?

That's pretty much it, the last person with any brains leaving california should shut off the lights on the way out.

Moses 10-24-2013 10:16 AM

This is the quad at UC Davis. Blocking a sidewalk has NO effect on foot traffic. The University and the police could have easily ignored the problem but they got all excited about putting on the riot gear. The average GPA of a kid admitted to UC Davis is 4.2. Bright kids protesting non-violently. The cops behaved like thugs.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1382638574.jpg

Kraftwerk 10-24-2013 10:19 AM

It possible that in China they would be pepper sprayed then jailed for x yrs..

tweezers74 10-24-2013 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moses (Post 7720520)
this is the quad at uc davis. Blocking a sidewalk has no effect on foot traffic. The university and the police could have easily ignored the problem but they got all excited about putting on the riot gear. The average gpa of a kid admitted to uc davis is 4.2. Bright kids protesting non-violently. The cops behaved like thugs.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1382638574.jpg

+1

RWebb 10-24-2013 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyg2 (Post 7720471)
the last person with any brains leaving california should shut off the lights on the way out.


No - please don't leave the PARFers stumbling around in the dark.

sammyg2 10-24-2013 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moses (Post 7720520)
This is the quad at UC Davis. Blocking a sidewalk has NO effect on foot traffic. The University and the police could have easily ignored the problem but they got all excited about putting on the riot gear. The average GPA of a kid admitted to UC Davis is 4.2. Bright kids protesting non-violently. The cops behaved like thugs.

There is a HUGE difference beteeen education and intelligence. HUGE.
They were acting stupidly.
They were involved in unlawful assembly.
They refused to move when asked to move.
They ASKED to get pepper-sprayed.
They said PLEASE pepper-spray us.

They got less than they deserved.

Jeff Higgins 10-24-2013 12:04 PM

Assembly is not rendered "unlawful" simply because some authority claims it is. Don't be so eager to see us inch ever closer to the police state.

They had every right to be there. They were absolutely not harming a thing, nor even so much as inconveniencing anyone. They were completely non-violent. All they did was piss off some self-important bureaucratic lout who orderd their removal because he didn't like them. They now need to ferret out that weasel and do away with him. And everone else in the chain of command between him and this coward with the spray can.

Our Constitution is supposed to protect us from the whims of men like this. Included in those protections is the right to peacably assemble. Without first getting a permit to do so, by the way. Don't be so quick to wad it up and throw it away.

madcorgi 10-24-2013 12:08 PM

Right on, Jeff. Good analysis of that pesky Constitution thingie.

Terry

MikeSid 10-24-2013 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyg2 (Post 7720622)
...They were involved in unlawful assembly...

Not according to the California Supreme Court or the U.S. Dist. Court Judge who approved the settlement.

In California, for an assembly to be unlawful there has to be "a clear and present danger of imminent violence." 21 kids sitting peacefully on a university sidewalk isn't even close to unlawful assembly.

All that said, even if it were, the actions of the cops to disperse the "unlawful assembly" were not reasonably tailored to the "danger" posed by the assembly.

The cops could have ignored the protest. If they really needed to open the sidewalk, they could have ordered them to disperse and arrested anyone who didn't comply.

And while there might not automatically be a direct correlation between good grades and being wise, it strikes me that the protesters were proved to be the smarter ones in this encounter.

Moses 10-24-2013 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Higgins (Post 7720696)
Assembly is not rendered "unlawful" simply because some authority claims it is. Don't be so eager to see us inch ever closer to the police state.

They had every right to be there. They were absolutely not harming a thing, nor even so much as inconveniencing anyone. They were completely non-violent. All they did was piss off some self-important bureaucratic lout who orderd their removal because he didn't like them. They now need to ferret out that weasel and do away with him. And everone else in the chain of command between him and this coward with the spray can.

Our Constitution is supposed to protect us from the whims of men like this. Included in those protections is the right to peacably assemble. Without first getting a permit to do so, by the way. Don't be so quick to wad it up and throw it away.

This is it...EXACTLY.

gacook 10-24-2013 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Higgins (Post 7720696)
Assembly is not rendered "unlawful" simply because some authority claims it is. Don't be so eager to see us inch ever closer to the police state.

They had every right to be there. They were absolutely not harming a thing, nor even so much as inconveniencing anyone. They were completely non-violent. All they did was piss off some self-important bureaucratic lout who orderd their removal because he didn't like them. They now need to ferret out that weasel and do away with him. And everone else in the chain of command between him and this coward with the spray can.

Our Constitution is supposed to protect us from the whims of men like this. Included in those protections is the right to peacably assemble. Without first getting a permit to do so, by the way. Don't be so quick to wad it up and throw it away.

I find myself nodding in agreement.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.