![]() |
If GM continues in the spirit of the C5 Z06, I will never have a bad thing to say about modern Corvettes. I drove a C5 Z06 around the GM track here and it knocked my socks off, to put it mildly.
I think that one "only" had 405hp. Would love to own one, but it would mean having to get rid of the 911. Not gonna happen. |
Quote:
The average age of a new Corvette buyer last year was 54 Do you lose all your hair between 52 and 54? |
Quote:
|
I was wondering how you achieve variable valve timing with pushrods and a single cam?
Apparently you don't - at least not independently for int / exh: Quote:
I sure am glad I am not a Corvette buyer. The new model tops the old by quite a bit every time. I am looking forward to seeing their body redesign. The C6 looked too close to the C5. G |
Quote:
So it is possible to phase both intake and exhaust at the same time Expect the C7 styling to be evolutional, like C6 was to C5, with only a couple distinct/notable differences in the coupe version. It will be shorter, with shorter overhangs, and smaller overall. The interior will be a huge (needed) change in the right direction The biggest news (imho) will be overall weight and mass distribution. I know the target is 3,000 pounds. |
Good ole American V8 HP! :cool:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thank you, motion. :) Sweet engine. Somebody's gonna want to buy one off the shelf and put it in an S-10 or an old Camaro. |
Quote:
|
you wont get me hating on a corvette...i pretty much like them all..
well, maybe not the ones from the charlies angels years..:D the mustang II's were worse..haha |
Quote:
However, if you tilt the dyno 45 degrees (and hold it there), that simulates 1 g cornering since there is now as much force pushing down on the oil as there is pushing laterally. If you tilt more than 45 degrees you get a higher simulated lateral g force. |
It's love to have one to hoon around in from time to time.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yet I like the C6. Just a freshening of the same style, but they fixed the goofy proportions. I've enjoyed every Corvette I've ever driven. I like the massive V8 grunt. Horsepower per dollar, it's tough to beat a small-block Chevy. |
Quote:
Wrong. The Coyote is lighter than the LSx engines. (444lbs vs 466 lbs) It's also shorter by 2.6 inches, and is the same height. It is however 4.3 inches wider...but that's because of the wider DOHC heads. |
Quote:
G |
I guess perhaps I was expecting too much from this new engine. When I heard that the supposed "world leader" in V8 engines was investing $1 billion dollars for the next generation V8, I had very high hopes.
So we end up with: 6+ liters displacement, cylinder deactivation, DI, variable valve timing and 450+ HP. Not bad...except that the Hemi from Chrysler was doing this 3 years ago (no DI, however). And in 392 guise, it makes more power AND torque. This from Chrysler who was on their deathbed when the 392 was tweaked. And I'm rather certain no one will ever accuse Chrysler of being master of the V8. Nor did they need $1 billion to develop it. Then we can look at the Ford 5.0 Coyote engine. It's one of the lightest V8 on the market, fairly compact and in Boss tune, makes nearly the same HP at 444. It will be DI next round, as the casting bosses are already in place. In terms of specific output, the 5.0 makes nearly 90 HP/L vs 73HP/L. I dunno...maybe my expectation were unreal. Really...the new GM V8 isn't anything fantastic all things considered. |
Any details on the vvt mechanism? I can't imagine this being all that variable given 1 cam and pushrods.
Still pretty awesome. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
G |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website