A problem with science and steps toward a solution.

[RWebb]

Originally Posted by sammyg2

I have a serious objection to people who haven't BTDT, and who's primary source if info is others who haven't BTDT, telling the rest of us who HAVE BTDT that they know more about it than we do.
I have an even bigger objection to them getting paid with my tax money to pretend to know what they don't.

Interesting. But you are not a scientist and have NOT BT or DT.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

re the comment on studies: Scientific studies will be published in a peer reviewed scientific journal (some govt. agencies have another layer of internal peer review before publishing in a journal, or putting out their own report - USGS is one example).

Some areas of inquiry are simply difficult to test: economics, political "science" (which claim to be science); even physics has one (string theory, aka string philosophy)

then you get into things like history, etc. which are liberal arts but still subject to various standards, tho their conclusions cannot be tested as in a science


But I suspect Kaos has some particular area of science in mind, so why not come out with it so this thread can got to PARF...

[KaptKaos]

Originally Posted by RWebb

Interesting. But you are not a scientist and have NOT BT or DT.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


But I suspect Kaos has some particular area of science in mind, so why not come out with it so this thread can got to PARF...

Small game birds :-)