Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Miscellaneous and Off Topic Forums > Off Topic Discussions


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
recycled sixtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Edmonton Canada
Posts: 5,949
Garage
Co-ownership or partnership of a condo....

Just starting my income tax and would like to know whether a condo owned by husband and wife (50/50) for tax purposes should be co-ownership or partnership?
I know US tax laws are different but are there any glaring legal implications? Or possible tax consequences?

Old 01-30-2013, 01:55 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Bye, Bye.
 
Scooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 6,167
Is the property held for business purposes? If so, an LLC may be appropriate for tax or liability reasons. If you are figuring taxes for last year, then the LLC idea is too late.

Since 50/50 ownership is normally an implied partnership, there should be no tax consequence.

If it is a vacation home with no rental, then your property normally does not have a business purpose and cannot be held as a business.

These comments are merely in general terms of course. Your situation may require addition information and planning.
__________________
Elvis has left the building.
Old 01-30-2013, 02:41 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Non Compos Mentis
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Off the grid- Almost
Posts: 10,593
With US tax law, isn't a married couple treated as one entity?

Unless "Married, Filing separately", of course.
Old 01-30-2013, 03:35 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Checked out
 
McLovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On a beach
Posts: 10,127
Co-ownership would be easier for tax purposes, at least in the US.

A partnership is a separate legal entity. If it were held in a partnership, the partnership would have to file a separate tax return. The partnership would have to issue K-1s to each partner. Etc.
Old 01-30-2013, 03:56 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
recycled sixtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Edmonton Canada
Posts: 5,949
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by McLovin View Post
Co-ownership would be easier for tax purposes, at least in the US.

A partnership is a separate legal entity. If it were held in a partnership, the partnership would have to file a separate tax return. The partnership would have to issue K-1s to each partner. Etc.
I just looked it up in the Can. Revenue Agency rules. I conclude the main defining difference is that the partnership is set up with the intention of making a profit.
We purchased the condo with the eventual idea of our living there. So we rent it out in the meantime. As you mention there is more paperwork to set up a partnership.
Co-ownership seems to be the better way to go. There is another difference in that a business such as property rental may supply more than just a place to live. I think that I will have to do more research......

Thanks everybody for your opinions.

Old 01-30-2013, 04:25 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:02 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.