Originally Posted by Hugh R (Post 7697003)

Not defending it at all. I'm just saying analysis of two nuggets doesn't mean they are a representative sample to make any kind of a reasonable or statistical conclusion on much of anything.

Now if they'd done say 30 or 40 analysis from different vendors/manufacturers and found 10%, 20%, 50%, etc. had some of the junk mentioned above, then they might have had something meaningful to say. BTW, I'm pretty sure a whole lot of the creators of this "miracle food" use lots of parts that they don't want to advertise. I think the whole nugget thing was a way to use more, less desirable chicken parts.

With nuggets you are probably less likely to get Salmonella poisoning, at least they've been already cooked, versus bringing a Foster Farm's chicken into your kitchen, cutting it up on your wood cutting board, wiping down the board and the counter with a sponge and then using the same cutting board, counter and sponge to cut up your salad fixings.

Originally Posted by 911pcars (Post 7697019)

Uh, Okay, you mean like hot dogs. Not sure how random 100 samples would be from the same manufacturer if they prep a slurry of the product from a large industrial mixing tank, inject it into a form, then cook it.

Originally Posted by Hugh R (Post 7697003)

analysis of two nuggets doesn't mean they are a representative sample to make any kind of a reasonable conclusion ... on much of anything.

Originally Posted by Hydrocket (Post 7697196)

Soylent Green, perhaps? :)

Originally Posted by RWebb (Post 7697280)

this part is wrong