Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Aspen crash video (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/792950-aspen-crash-video.html)

Mark Wilson 01-23-2014 07:24 AM

Why were they landing downwind?

slodave 01-23-2014 11:09 AM

You can't fly over the town of Aspen. This prevents the airport from turning around when the wind shifts.

slodave 01-23-2014 11:13 AM

RE: IR... To see through snow/fog.

Seahawk 01-23-2014 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by widebody911 (Post 7871033)
Dumb question: why IR cameras?

Flight line security at night.

That and as the video shows, IR "sees" things a non IR camera can't possibly: The accident video would have been aircraft lights tossing about and then the explosion and that is about it.

IR has changed the way we fight and watch.

kach22i 01-23-2014 12:19 PM

Gusty winds (wind sheer?) is what I heard on the TV news.

Bummer.

strath44 01-23-2014 01:18 PM

www.theavherald.com is worth a look for pilots and nonpilots looking for a bit more tech details on daily incidents

widebody911 01-23-2014 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seahawk (Post 7871547)
Flight line security at night.

That and as the video shows, IR "sees" things a non IR camera can't possibly: The accident video would have been aircraft lights tossing about and then the explosion and that is about it.

IR has changed the way we fight and watch.

Makes sense.

Did anyone see the SF Asiana incident video off the OP's link? :eek:

greglepore 01-23-2014 02:20 PM

Read on another forum that the FAA intends to cite the 6? bizjets that landed in front of the Gulfstream for landing well above max edit tailwind.

Max for the Gulfstream is allegedly 10knts - winds were well in excess of that.

Think Joeaska has a ton of hours in the type.

widgeon13 01-23-2014 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greglepore (Post 7871804)
Read on another forum that the FAA intends to cite the 6? bizjets that landed in front of the Gulfstream for landing well above max crosswind.

Max for the Gulfstream is allegedly 10knts - winds were well in excess of that.

Think Joeaska has a ton of hours in the type.

I think 10 kts is max recommended tailwind. (No limit on crosswind component)

Here is a good commentary on the event.

A Longtime Pilot on the Aspen Crash - James Fallows - The Atlantic

rattlsnak 01-23-2014 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by speeder (Post 7870972)
Where is KTEB? I know that both Santa Monica and Van Nuys airports here in L.A. have a lot of private jets, I had just heard or read at some time that Aspen has the most. There are hundreds parked there, practically stacked-up.

I'm talking private jets, not planes of all kinds.


Teterboro. Hundreds upon hundreds of airplanes there year round. It is the GA airport right outside of NYC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by widgeon13 (Post 7871969)
I think 10 kts is max recommended tailwind. (No limit on crosswind component)

It is not a recommendation it is a limitation. Meaning if you break it, you can get violated by the FAA.

Nate2046 01-23-2014 09:36 PM

I have almost 8k hours in the CL-65 which is basically the same airplane as the Challenger with a couple fuselage plugs added to hold 50 people.
I wouldn't say its tricky to land but its a little different than what most are used to flying on larger airplanes. The approach speeds are relatively high and the entire approach is flown in a nose down attitude since its a 'hard wing' meaning no leading edge devices. So there's a little bit more of a rotation in the flare than you have on airplanes with slats.

Landing at high elevation means you're going to have higher true airspeed. Couple that with a tailwind and they must have been cooking coming in there. Higher ground speed means higher descent rate which may have caught them off guard as the runway rose up to meet them.

Inadequate flare results in a bounce off the main gear, inadequate correction means they come back down on the nose gear, the mains come down hard, porpoise up and throw the airplane up into the air with a pitching down moment. Come down hard on the nose again and that's all she wrote.

Nothing more than my speculation from my watching the video and probably completely off base but there you goSmileWavy

tcar 01-27-2014 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greglepore (Post 7871804)
Read on another forum that the FAA intends to cite the 6? bizjets that landed in front of the Gulfstream for landing well above max edit tailwind.

Max for the Gulfstream is allegedly 10knts - winds were well in excess of that.

Think Joeaska has a ton of hours in the type.

What Gulfstream?.. not heard anything about a Gulfstream...

Didn't know Joe flew Gulfstreams, knew about Lears, etc.

Did a Gulfstream land before the crash?

The Challenger that crashed was the last plane to "land" there for the day.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.