![]() |
|
|
|
Cogito Ergo Sum
|
Well this is... Ambitious! 917 replica...
http://bringatrailer.com/2014/08/19/flat-twelve-home-built-subaru-powered-porsche-91710-canam-tribute/
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
i'm just a cook
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: downtown vernon,central new york
Posts: 4,868
|
saw that last night , quite the project.
|
||
![]() |
|
You do not have permissi
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: midwest
Posts: 39,923
|
Not much crumple in front of the driver.
A lot of randomly scattered bars added aft. Major physics-transition seems vague. Other than that...a notewothy project. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
I have an electrician installing a Megasquirt MS3 Pro EVO and he said the engines will be running in the next couple of weeks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adocRB6Ntbs&t=35s |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
^^
Interesting car, and it looks like it will be a hoot to drive, but I wonder how Porsche feels about their name being on it.
__________________
. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 11,249
|
An ambitious and awesome project - Thank you for sharing! I PRAY the builder gets nothing but respect and helpful suggestions, that we keep things positive and that we don't repay his generosity in documenting the build with ugly-ass cheap shots.
__________________
David 1972 911T/S MFI Survivor |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 11,249
|
Someone on Pelican once offered hi-res drawings of the 917's chassis - which I promptly printed and hung in my garage! And those drawings made it abundantly clear how exposed the drivers feet and lower legs were to any front-end collision, as they are entirely in front of the front axles! Amazing when you stop to think of it!
__________________
David 1972 911T/S MFI Survivor |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 11,249
|
Found it!
__________________
David 1972 911T/S MFI Survivor |
||
![]() |
|
Bollweevil
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fulshear, Texanistan
Posts: 3,361
|
Isn't that one of the main differences between the 956 and 962 ? Due to rules changes in the mid 1980's the drivers feet had to be behind the center line of the front wheels and the feet were in front on the center line of the 956 thus the 962 was developed.
__________________
Jack 74 911 Coupe 2.7L - K21 Option - S suspension |
||
![]() |
|
Control Group
|
Pretty sure that is right Jack
__________________
She was the kindest person I ever met |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 53,459
|
The 956 was designed to compete in group C in Europe and IMSA GTP in the US, starting in 1982. IMSA had rules that were different from group C and they wouldn't let the 956 run over here. Porsche introduced the 962 in 1984 in the US. The biggest change was essentially moving the front suspension forward, to get the drivers feet behind the centerline of the axle. They also mandated a steel roll cage around the cockpit, which was the other big change. Porsche had used aluminum for roll cages for a long time, if you can believe that.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|