Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   New Mazda CX-3 - Can't wait to see how this one's priced (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/839293-new-mazda-cx-3-cant-wait-see-how-ones-priced.html)

LeeH 11-18-2014 09:28 PM

New Mazda CX-3 - Can't wait to see how this one's priced
 
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1416378401.jpg

2016 Mazda CX-3 is a 2 cute ute - Autoblog


http://youtu.be/kopN0VykymQ?t=37m36s

bri450sl 11-19-2014 02:22 AM

I like it with one exception. Why must Mazda place the nav screen "on" the dash instead of in it? It looks like some silly add on. I'm in the market for a new vehicle and I passed on the Mazda 3 because of this (and also because of the silly vinyl interior on all but the top model).

KNS 11-19-2014 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bri450sl (Post 8360147)
I like it with one exception. Why must Mazda place the nav screen "on" the dash instead of in it? It looks like some silly add on. I'm in the market for a new vehicle and I passed on the Mazda 3 because of this (and also because of the silly vinyl interior on all but the top model).

It seems more and more automakers are doing just that - sticking the screen on top of the dash instead of integrating it into the dash. It looks awful.

VincentVega 11-19-2014 05:14 AM

Benz is doing the same thing, looks cheap to me. I'll stick to using my phone.

Nice looking Mazda

dave 911 11-19-2014 05:26 AM

Kind of looks like the Suburu XV Crosstrek a bit. I bought an XV earlier this year, if this was available then I would have looked at it, the CX-5 was too big for what I wanted.

LeeH 11-19-2014 06:21 AM

I don't like the looks of the nav screen from the outside, but I sat in a Mazda3 last time I had my car in for service and it really didn't bother me from the driver's seat.

Based on the success of the CX-5, I'm guessing the CX-3 will sell very well. Would have to think that it will be priced below the 5, which is pretty reasonable.

ckelly78z 11-19-2014 06:50 AM

I like the looks of it, and, being a Mazda, it should be quick and lively, and last for a long time.

Jrboulder 11-19-2014 08:06 AM

I can't imagine that thing has great rear viability.

BRPORSCHE 11-19-2014 08:50 AM

Oh boy I want this!

911SauCy 11-19-2014 10:26 AM

Ahh yes, just what consumers wanted, another micro-suv...perfect!

theFONZ 11-19-2014 04:59 PM

Apparently it is what consumers want. Their CX-5 sells like hot cakes, and other small SUVs are big sellers as well. A lot of people feel safer in a higher car, but they don't want the mileage of a traditional SUV.

onewhippedpuppy 11-19-2014 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 911SauCy (Post 8360731)
Ahh yes, just what consumers wanted, another micro-suv...perfect!

Actually it is. We apparently won't buy wagons, but we'll buy wagons with a higher center of gravity, inferior handling, worse performance and MPG. Just call it an SUV.

With that said, it's another damn good looking Mazda. I think their cars are all segment leading.

nostatic 11-19-2014 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onewhippedpuppy (Post 8361594)
Actually it is. We apparently won't buy wagons, but we'll buy wagons with a higher center of gravity, inferior handling, worse performance and MPG. Just call it an SUV.

With that said, it's another damn good looking Mazda. I think their cars are all segment leading.

Having owned wagons, SAV/SUVs, and hot hatches, I am preferring the latter. As long as you don't need to go off-road, this car is winning. Actually has more usable room than the X1.

http://image.motortrend.com/f/roadte...-in-motion.jpg

onewhippedpuppy 11-20-2014 05:56 AM

Yup, I love a hatchback. Which in reality is only marginally different from a wagon, that line is pretty fuzzy.

911SauCy 11-20-2014 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onewhippedpuppy (Post 8361594)
Actually it is. We apparently won't buy wagons, but we'll buy wagons with a higher center of gravity, inferior handling, worse performance and MPG. Just call it an SUV..

I'm LOL'ing

My quip was only partially serious as I do know people like these, for all stated reasons. My sister-in-law purchased a cx-5 and its literally a bad handling, upright seated sedan. I can't imagine how small/useless this one will be. Her 50lb dog doesn't fit in the cargo area without looking like he's playing Twister while pressing his doggy beard against the glass...but she "loves" it and her $400/mo payment.

To me they're ridiculous, but hey, this is coming from a guy who uses both hands to drive, doesn't talk or text while driving and can fit a wife, her crap, 2-60lb pit mixes, a baby, his crap, 2 sets of golf clubs and my toothbrush in a '01 540i...for a family weekend at the beach :)

Agreed, Mazda's, every fricking one, look *****in!

id10t 11-20-2014 06:50 AM

And for our Canadian friends, Mazda recently changed their warranty on 2013 and later vehicles - no more milage limits, just time. So what used to be 3 years 36k miles is now just 3 years.

scottmandue 11-20-2014 07:15 AM

I like it!
Wife is pushing for a hybrid... this might sway her.
A little afraid of sticker shock thou...

id10t 11-20-2014 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottmandue (Post 8362114)
I like it!
Wife is pushing for a hybrid... this might sway her.
A little afraid of sticker shock thou...

We got a loaded 2012 CX-9 in late 2012 for just over $26k after taxes, etc. Sticker was just over $30k.

Z-man 11-20-2014 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bri450sl (Post 8360147)
I like it with one exception. Why must Mazda place the nav screen "on" the dash instead of in it? It looks like some silly add on. I'm in the market for a new vehicle and I passed on the Mazda 3 because of this (and also because of the silly vinyl interior on all but the top model).

The higher the nav screen is, the quicker the driver can change his or her view from the screen to the windshield. So putting the screen up higher makes sense from a safety perspective.

But I agree - even with your cars (I work for MBUSA), the nav screens look dis-integrated from the dash - almost looks like it was put there as an afterthought. The screens in the MB cars are no longer touch screen since it is difficult to reach from a properly seated position - so the controls are integrated into the console area.

-Z

nostatic 11-20-2014 08:22 AM

fwiw the high screen looks right in the i3. In the Mazda, not so much. Depends on the rest of the interior design. The i3 is different enough that it doesn't stick out as an add-on imho.

http://media.caranddriver.com/images...-s-520x318.jpg


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.