![]() |
|
https://www.hemmings.com/blog/2017/04/17/mecums-houston-sale-tells-a-tale-of-two-corvette-sting-rays/?refer=news
Which is more valuable: A period-correct (but not entirely original), NCRS Top Flight Award-winning split window 1963 Corvette Sting Ray, or a restomodded 1967 Corvette Sting Ray coupe, likely capable of running with the latest models from Bowling Green? While both made the top-10 at Mecum’s recent Houston, Texas, auction, bidders at this particular sale found the latter example to be more desirable, as it sold for a hammer price of $185,500, compared to the first-year coupe’s $140,000. |
Quote:
the early mustang can't even fit the wide cleveland small block/heads let alone the new ford OHC v8s that are even wider/taller |
Quote:
|
It was good to see a post from JP in this thread, and then it turned to a different feeling.
I kinda miss the old guy. |
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9NLylqnR4mU" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Not me.................
I would not pay a dime for a Ford with a Chevy engine! That would be like putting a Ford engine in a Corvette! Wrong, wrong, wrong on so many levels!
|
Jimmy cracked a lot of corn with that 'Stang. Meh, I don't care.
|
A few yrs ago, I took my 65 mustang to a car show. The register guy asked
" what category do you want to enter? With a perfect straight face i replied " I thought I would enter with the Mustangs" his reply to me "Not with those wheels"http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1585916594.png I tell that story every chance I get just so people know what to expect. |
Why? Are they Chevy wheels ?
Remind me of Torq Thrusts like Bullitt |
~5 year old thread...
Isn't that an actual Foose abomination? The car is pretty, but the more I look, the less I like. |
Quote:
Always were my favorites |
Quote:
halibrand mags were earliest version then cragar SS's had the look but not the quality or real mag's metal |
Quote:
|
First it is a NOTCH BACK ...ehhhh Shoulda been a Fastback or convert...
Shoulda stayed with a 289 HYPO...or even that Flat Crank Ford..yeah.. Shoulda stayed with Analog gauges etc. On my 69 Mach 428 SCJ...special order Black...My mods were put into engine performance, Suspension and Brake upgrades..NONE OF WHICH MEETS THE EYE. or is not reversible if wanted???? The car looks stock.. it is anything but..It handles like a small block, stops decently with 4 wheel discs and will run like a scalded dog...it was not built for off the line performance..but running down the Hwy...with a 3.5 ratio Posi Third Member.. After an hour or so of driving it, I would get tired of it..it is a heavy car. I shulda just stuck with da Porsches... a nice 356 Cab/Speedster and S car go... Those cars are nice and lithe, stop well and are reasonably quick. |
Quote:
Great example of how most car guys are just unbearable A-holes. |
Quote:
So..... Guess who had a 65 Mustang fastback (grey) and guess who got a trophy for best early Mustang, yep one and the same, Mr. register guy. That how it is sometimes., |
Weird to think that exists today. For him to say you're not driving a Mustang? What a jackass.
|
Canadian Sopranos is a real thing!
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website