Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Unidentified planes come at you and HOW do you not go defensive? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/910202-unidentified-planes-come-you-how-do-you-not-go-defensive.html)

masraum 04-15-2016 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeyGon (Post 9080259)
I don't remember so many Russian planes buzzing American Navy ships like this.

Oh, well clearly, if you don't remember, then it must not have happened. Clearly, in the last 100 years, every instance of this sort of thing has been heavily chronicled in the news papers and on the Internet (Yes, this is exactly the thing the Internet was invented for back in WWI :rolleyes:)

stealthn 04-15-2016 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobra (Post 9080432)
Blame Canada

Probably an Alberta pilot too :D

recycled sixtie 04-15-2016 06:08 AM

Thanks for the great story Paul/Seahawk. I remember the documentary showing Castro in a missile placement back in the '60's. A US aircraft flies over Cuba and Castro says shoot it down. I don't think this world needs this kind of action again.

How far was this ship from the Baltic Coast? I am sure if there was a Russian ship anywhere close to North America they would get the same buzz job treatment.
Cooler heads prevail....

flatbutt 04-15-2016 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seahawk (Post 9079824)
I was there through the start of Ernest Will to Operation Preying Mantis. It was an interesting time.



All true.

The ship being buzzed is an Aegis equipped destroyer with SPY-1 radar - or a newer variant. These are extremely capable ships and I would imagine had everything ready to go should the SU-24 have painted the USS Cook in a particular manner.

The SU-24 is about as stealthy as the Queen Mary and about as much of a threat. The Cook wasn't unaware.

Quick sea story.

I was the Air Boss on the USS La Salle (and the COMIDEASTFOR Air Officer) during the first Persian Gulf War.

During the run up to the ground was we spent a lot of time at sea in the Gulf. The CO of the La Salle was an F-14 pilot who was doing his deep draft ship tour prior to getting his carrier. He would go on to command a carrier, carrier strike group and eventually rise to become the Vice Commander of Naval Operations, a four star billet, second dude in charge.

We became good friends and he was very helpful in my career.

While underway after an import period in Dubai, the CO and I were chatting on the flight deck. It was a fairly nice day for the Gulf and we were yapping.

He is facing aft and I am facing forward in relation to the ship. I spot an air contact about 3/4 miles in front of the ship - it looks like a P-3.

He turns with me as the P-3 does a port pass on the ship at about a 100 ft in both altitude and separation from the ship. I can see the pilot in the left seat, Ray-bans.

We can also see the roundel on the tail of the P-3: Iranian Air force.

The CO looks at me, I look at him, we do a little Bluto dance on the flight deck and he starts running for CIC.

What a goat rope: The La Salle was an ancient ship with a lot of upgrades but had Helen Keller air search radar. The Iranian P-3 was an F-117 to us, which made it clear that I was on a ship bringing a paint ball gun to a missile fight.

Eek.

Edit: BTW, the amount of Nautical Grab A%% that goes on in international waters would surprise most.

You guys never cease to amaze with your histories.

recycled sixtie 04-15-2016 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stealthn (Post 9080578)
Probably an Alberta pilot too :D

Likely a perogy laden Edmonton pilot....:)

BeyGon 04-15-2016 07:03 AM

Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday the U.S. Navy ship that was buzzed by two Russian warplanes in the Baltic Sea this week could have opened fire under U.S. military rules of engagement.

The USS Donald Cook (DDG-75) was conducting flight operations with a Polish helicopter Monday when two Russian Su-24 attack aircraft came within 1,000 yards of the destroyer, flying just 100 feet off the ground. The following day, a Russian jet came within 30 feet of the destroyer.

A U.S. defense official described the maneuvers to Fox News as a "simulated attack profile."

"We condemn this kind of behavior. It is reckless. It is provocative. It is dangerous. And under the rules of engagement that could have been a shoot-down," Kerry told CNN Espanol in Miami Thursday.

In all cases, a military commander has the authority to defend his or her ship, plane or other unit. The commander is expected to use his or her best judgment under the circumstances to determine whether the ship faces an imminent threat.

"People need to understand that this is serious business and the United States is not going to be intimidated on the high seas," Kerry added. "We are communicating to the Russians how dangerous this is and our hope is that this will never be repeated."

techweenie 04-15-2016 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masraum (Post 9080539)
Oh, well clearly, if you don't remember, then it must not have happened. Clearly, in the last 100 years, every instance of this sort of thing has been heavily chronicled in the news papers and on the Internet (Yes, this is exactly the thing the Internet was invented for back in WWI :rolleyes:)

Russian flyby happened last in 2004 - you know, the beginning of the Obama administration. LOL.

Corvus Corvax 04-15-2016 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by techweenie (Post 9080672)
Russian flyby happened last in 2004 - you know, the beginning of the Obama administration. LOL.

Well, in all fairness, he was planning on becoming POTUS then, so I think the rules of Obama Derangement Syndrome allow us to blame him proactively for that incident. If he had only been stronger in his foreign policy, those damn commies would have known their place.

BK911 04-15-2016 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seahawk (Post 9079824)
I was there through the start of Ernest Will to Operation Preying Mantis. It was an interesting time.



All true.

The ship being buzzed is an Aegis equipped destroyer with SPY-1 radar - or a newer variant. These are extremely capable ships and I would imagine had everything ready to go should the SU-24 have painted the USS Cook in a particular manner.

The SU-24 is about as stealthy as the Queen Mary and about as much of a threat. The Cook wasn't unaware.

Quick sea story.

I was the Air Boss on the USS La Salle (and the COMIDEASTFOR Air Officer) during the first Persian Gulf War.

During the run up to the ground was we spent a lot of time at sea in the Gulf. The CO of the La Salle was an F-14 pilot who was doing his deep draft ship tour prior to getting his carrier. He would go on to command a carrier, carrier strike group and eventually rise to become the Vice Commander of Naval Operations, a four star billet, second dude in charge.

We became good friends and he was very helpful in my career.

While underway after an import period in Dubai, the CO and I were chatting on the flight deck. It was a fairly nice day for the Gulf and we were yapping.

He is facing aft and I am facing forward in relation to the ship. I spot an air contact about 3/4 miles in front of the ship - it looks like a P-3.

He turns with me as the P-3 does a port pass on the ship at about a 100 ft in both altitude and separation from the ship. I can see the pilot in the left seat, Ray-bans.

We can also see the roundel on the tail of the P-3: Iranian Air force.

The CO looks at me, I look at him, we do a little Bluto dance on the flight deck and he starts running for CIC.

What a goat rope: The La Salle was an ancient ship with a lot of upgrades but had Helen Keller air search radar. The Iranian P-3 was an F-117 to us, which made it clear that I was on a ship bringing a paint ball gun to a missile fight.

Eek.

Edit: BTW, the amount of Nautical Grab A%% that goes on in international waters would surprise most.


Cool story.
I was on the Kidd.
"Monkey monkey monkey!!!"

Seahawk 04-15-2016 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BK911 (Post 9080724)
Cool story.
I was on the Kidd.
"Monkey monkey monkey!!!"

I landed on the Kidd a bunch in 1988 during Earnest Will. The OinC of the H-2 Detachment is a friend of mine. I was on FFG-37.

Nice ship.

During the Persian Gulf War I flew with the Desert Ducks once a week or so but don't recall if I landed on the Kidd.

BK911 04-15-2016 08:19 AM

Did you fly a cobra?

Shaun @ Tru6 04-15-2016 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cvjcguk (Post 9080764)
Multiple US fighter jets with missile lock on those a-hole rooskies would have a demotivational effect on their fun and games.[img]ht tp://financeseeyou.com/red/ima ges/ 7 .gif[/img]
[img]ht tp://financeseeyou.com/red/imag es/ 8.gif[/img] http://financeseeyou.com/red/images/21.gif



Oh, the irony, this spammer is probably a rooskie. Only work available in Russia is being a spambot on U.S. forums.

masraum 04-15-2016 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shaun @ tru6 (Post 9080785)
oh, the irony, this spammer is probably a rooskie. Only work available in russia is being a spambot on u.s. Forums.

lol

1990C4S 04-15-2016 09:34 AM

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1460738064.jpg

flipper35 04-15-2016 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by recycled sixtie (Post 9080586)
Thanks for the great story Paul/Seahawk. I remember the documentary showing Castro in a missile placement back in the '60's. A US aircraft flies over Cuba and Castro says shoot it down. I don't think this world needs this kind of action again.

How far was this ship from the Baltic Coast? I am sure if there was a Russian ship anywhere close to North America they would get the same buzz job treatment.
Cooler heads prevail....

They get within 60 miles as they leave port.

Clearly they should have destroyed the airfield with cruise missiles before they left port so they wouldn't be in this situation. :rolleyes:

flipper35 04-15-2016 12:08 PM

The Aviationist has some other photos taken.

http://theaviationist.com/2016/04/14/here-are-some-more-unbelievable-shots-of-the-russian-su-24s-buzzing-a-u-s-warship-in-the-baltic-sea/

http://theaviationist.com/wp-content...24-buzzing.jpg

flipper35 04-15-2016 12:10 PM

Sometimes they aren't so good at flying close.

http://theaviationist.com/2016/04/14/that-time-a-soviet-bomber-crashed-into-the-sea-after-buzzing-a-u-s-aircraft-carrier/

<iframe width="716" height="428" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/l3bijF2--os" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

widebody911 04-15-2016 01:44 PM

I'd really like to see what happens @ :47

Quote:

Originally Posted by flipper35 (Post 9081159)
Sometimes they aren't so good at flying close.

http://theaviationist.com/2016/04/14/that-time-a-soviet-bomber-crashed-into-the-sea-after-buzzing-a-u-s-aircraft-carrier/

<iframe width="716" height="428" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/l3bijF2--os" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


gary1101 04-15-2016 02:03 PM

How many different ways does a destroyer have to shot down a threat? Plus they can track many dozens of targets and shoot multiple targets at once. When traveling with a carrier a destroyer or missile cruiser is capable of providing the air traffic control duties. They carry multiple types of missiles as well as the very nasty Phalanx CIWS. At close range the Phalanx would shred the jets.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L0ZAGOuaqg

Tobra 04-15-2016 02:53 PM

You ever run over an aluminum can with a lawnmower?

That is how I imagine a jet would look if it tangled with a Phalanx system.

Shaun @ Tru6 04-15-2016 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobra (Post 9081379)
You ever run over an aluminum can with a lawnmower?

That is how I imagine a jet would look if it tangled with a Phalanx system.


Its a shame Obama has issued an executive order to have Phalanx systems removed from all Navy ships.

Seahawk 04-15-2016 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gary1101 (Post 9081291)
At close range the Phalanx would shred the jets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-L0ZAGOuaqg

I hope Sandy chimes in...but the affectionate name I knew CIWS by was "R2D2 With a Hard-On"

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1460757657.jpg

flipper35 04-15-2016 03:01 PM

The article says he stalled it.

flatbutt 04-15-2016 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seahawk (Post 9081395)
I hope Sandy chimes in...but the affectionate name I knew CIWS by was "R2D2 With a Hard-On"

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1460757657.jpg

I remember seeing film of the mini guns on Goony Birds? or maybe Puff the Magic Dragon? back in the70's. The tracers were coming out so fast that the bullet stream looked like a laser. That CIWS looks waaay bigger and badder than the minis.

stealthn 04-15-2016 04:04 PM

Why waste the bullets...just let a flock of Canadian geese go off the deck and craputzky. We've got extras for you here in Alberta

Corvus Corvax 04-15-2016 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun @ Tru6 (Post 9081385)
Its a shame Obama has issued an executive order to have Phalanx systems removed from all Navy ships.

I chuckled.

BeyGon 04-15-2016 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flatbutt (Post 9081413)
I remember seeing film of the mini guns on Goony Birds? or maybe Puff the Magic Dragon? back in the70's. The tracers were coming out so fast that the bullet stream looked like a laser. That CIWS looks waaay bigger and badder than the minis.

I remember seeing them in person and thinking how great they were. I don't remember the percentage but they aren't all tracers, like you said, they fired so fast they looked like a solid line snaking toward the earth.

Corvus Corvax 04-15-2016 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeyGon (Post 9081609)
I remember seeing them in person and thinking how great they were. I don't remember the percentage but they aren't all tracers, like you said, they fired so fast they looked like a solid line snaking toward the earth.

About 4500 rounds/minute, and the ratio is about four or five regular rounds per tracer round. At 75 rounds per second, your eye would see 15 or more tracer rounds in that second, and I could see how that would look like a solid line.

BK911 04-15-2016 07:07 PM

They don't need tracers.
One radar tracks the target.
Another tracks the rounds and adjusts until the difference is zero.
Fully automatic with no issues from incompetent equal opportunity fire control officers.

mreid 04-15-2016 07:30 PM

That's an Arleigh Burke class destroyer with the aegis combat system. There is no "missile lock". The days of painting the target with a fire control continuous wave illumination are long gone. There is no warning as the missile uplink codes are embedded in the SPY search radar transmissions. That is a lethal machine that lets the little gnats buzz around. That destroyer has many tools at its fingertips. Phalanx is almost the least of that pilots concerns.

BeyGon 04-15-2016 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BK911 (Post 9081744)
They don't need tracers.
One radar tracks the target.
Another tracks the rounds and adjusts until the difference is zero.
Fully automatic with no issues from incompetent equal opportunity fire control officers.

I don't know about that but the tracers help the friendly on the ground.

70SATMan 04-18-2016 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BK911 (Post 9080724)
Cool story.
I was on the Kidd.
"Monkey monkey monkey!!!"

Had a couple of ET buddies on the Kidd😀

I was on the Enterprise during Mantis. We were launching heavy A6s. Being in the Comms Div. allowed us to hear a lot of the traffic over the course of the day. Still remember the tension as our Cap. Came over the 1MC to tell us of the Roberts.

70SATMan 04-18-2016 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flatbutt (Post 9081413)
I remember seeing film of the mini guns on Goony Birds? or maybe Puff the Magic Dragon? back in the70's. The tracers were coming out so fast that the bullet stream looked like a laser. That CIWS looks waaay bigger and badder than the minis.

Heard a lot of stories from the CTs about the CIWS accuracy. Still have 4 dummy rounds with the interlocking tracks

GH85Carrera 04-18-2016 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeyGon (Post 9081609)
I remember seeing them in person and thinking how great they were. I don't remember the percentage but they aren't all tracers, like you said, they fired so fast they looked like a solid line snaking toward the earth.

It was capable of putting at least one bullet per square inch into a football field size area in just seconds.

One of my friends that was a Marine on the ground in Vietnam said they always gave any Air Force guys hell at a bar. He said they were totally pinned down on a battle and they had "Puff the magic dragon" show up and turned the enemies into fertilizer. He said they actually were buying the Air Force crew beer the next time he saw them. They still gave them hell, but they appreciated the backup.

flipper35 04-18-2016 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeyGon (Post 9081785)
I don't know about that but the tracers help the friendly on the ground.

When fired FROM Puff or an AC-130 they help the guys in the plane and the friendlies on the ground and can be terrifying to the enemy on the receiving end. For the CIWS on the ships there is no need for tracers and the CIWS is only for when al the other defensive systems fail. There was an interesting story about the Wisconsin during the first gulf war and the ships protecting it. I will post it if I find it again.

Don Ro 04-18-2016 03:58 PM

"You don't get to kill people just because they're being annoying. "
~~~~~~~~`
I heard that one also. The attitude of being bothered by a pesky fly.
The attitude of knowing one's power.

BeyGon 04-18-2016 04:33 PM

I always liked the Navy Pilots, they seemed to be a little more flamboyant, I knew one, carrier based, that was shot down twice in VN. His back was a mess, he said all the takeoffs and landings on the carrier and of course his two ejections had a lot to do with it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.