![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Corner balance/ ride height par duex
Here are the numbers currently on my problem child.....
c/b with 200# ballist on the driver's side: LF 606 RF 547 LR 897 RR 814 Ride height: LF 24 1/16 RF 24 15/16 LR 25 RR 25 1/4 camber lf -1.01 rf -1.26 lr -1.23 rr -1.28 caster lf 4.82 rf 4.72 toe lf .04 rf .04 lr .02 rr .01 Assuming the frame and struts are straight is this acceptable? I saw the post about B Anderson saying you need to be within 40 #s on the c/b. How true is that? How about the ride height? Local shops are telling me with in a .25" all the way around! What I intially wanted was the car lowered to Euro ride height, and a c/b, alignment for some track days and auto cross. What would be a set up that is acceptable? Can any one tell me what the ideal C/B, ride height numbers and alignment should be on this car for my intended purpose. I am running 7x16 and 9 x16 inch Fuchs with 205 and 245 SO3s if that matters. |
||
![]() |
|
Irrationally exuberant
|
They ought to be able to get the camber in the front more even than that. I run -1 degree negative camber in the front and -1.5 in the rear. This isn't ideal for track tires but it is a good compromise for a car that is used on the street as well as the track.
-Chris
__________________
'80 911 Nogaro blue Phoenix! '07 BMW 328i 245K miles! http://members.rennlist.org/messinwith911s/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I agree with Chris that the front camber should be closer. I just had my car done a couple of weeks ago. It's set up for street/track. Car is 87 coupe.
height: Front 24 3/4 L&R, Rear 24 7/8 L&R Weight: LF 615, RF 585, LR 923, RR 863 Camber: LF -0.9, RF -1.1, LR -1.7, RR -1.7 Caster: LF 6 deg., RF 6.1 deg Toe: LF -0.01, RF 0.00, LR 0.16, RR 0.16 Front Cross Camber: 0.1 deg. Front Cross Caster: -0.1 deg Front Total Toe: -0.01 deg. Front Set Back: 0.29 Rear Total Toe: 0.32 Rear Thrust Ange: 0.00
__________________
Don 24 Cayman GTS - GT Silver 23 Cayman GTS - Arctic Grey - Sold 97 993 Coupe - Arctic/Black - Sold 13 991 Coupe - Platinum/Black - Sold, 87 911 Coupe - Venetian Blue |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: AZ
Posts: 8,414
|
I also agree, and would add that your rear ride height is a just a tad high in relation to the front. Even with a fender measurement of .5" higher up front, you should still end up with 1 degree forward rake. That said, a little (more) forward rake/weight is fine IMO. So to make life easy, I try to get the same fender height all the way around (24.5" x 4 for example). Also, you should be able to increase the caster, rear toe, and rear neg. camber a fair amount without causing any abnormal tire wear issues.
Just for comparison, I've included the specs on my previous 911 below. It was set up for "aggressive street/light track", was mainly street-driven, and I had no uneven tire wear issues. Not to mention the car handled great! Car: 1988 911 Targa, 16x6F & 16x7R (w/28mm spacers) Ride Height: 24.75 (LF/RF/LR/RR) Corner Weights (175# driver ballast, 1/2 tank of fuel): LF 615, RF 611, LR 950, RR 869 Camber: LF -1.0, RF -1.0, LR -1.8, RR -1.8 Caster: LF 6.1, RF 6.0 Toe: LF .05, RF .05, LR .09, RR .08 Front Cross Camber: -0.0 Front Cross Caster: 0.1 Front Total Toe: .10 Rear Total Toe: .18 Rear Thrust Angle: .01 ![]() Last edited by Eric Coffey; 03-22-2003 at 09:06 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|