Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Denmark (EU)
Posts: 237
Garage
WebCam 20/21 questions

Hey guys

I have some questions about WebCam 20/21 camshafts.

First, do I really have to upgrade the valvetrain? I already have new OEMs.
Do any of you have first-hand experience with them? maybe on an SC 3.0? what do they "do" for your engine?

Are they bad for MPG? (or kml ... I'm from Europe) Maybe this is a "weird" question, but I have my reasons/ideas ...
I was considering using 964s but have been offered a set of WebCam 20/21 at a good price.
I really want to hear your stories- experiences!


Here are my engine specs:
1979 engine block: boat tail web
Crank: standard 70.4mm. Alu pressure plate. Standart lightened and polished connecting rods (-100g each)
95mm wössner, or JE pistons. 11.3: 1 compretion (as light as you can get them, so I'm leaning towards wössner)
Exhaust: SSI. 2 in 2 out muffler. (the one I have is right through ... so I'll probably modify it slightly ... for the sake of my neighbors)
dual ignition, MS3 box, knock sensor.
Individual throttle body, and homemade intake manifold, their length is determined by final choice of cam, muffler, etc.

Cheers, mads
aka. Aircooled4evr


Last edited by Aircooled4evr; 11-30-2019 at 07:54 AM..
Old 11-29-2019, 11:50 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
Bill Douglas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: bottom left corner of the world
Posts: 22,753
Would you be using them with SSIs or similar?
Old 11-29-2019, 06:39 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Denmark (EU)
Posts: 237
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Douglas View Post
Would you be using them with SSIs or similar?
Sorry ... totally forgot to give general info of the engine! thanks for the reply Bill Douglas!
I will add the information in my starting post!
Old 11-30-2019, 04:11 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Sboxin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 858
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aircooled4evr View Post
Hey guys

I have some questions about WebCam 20/21 camshafts.

First, do I really have to upgrade the valvetrain? I already have new OEMs.
Do any of you have first-hand experience with them? maybe on an SC 3.0? what do they "do" for your engine?

Are they bad for MPG? (or kml ... I'm from Europe) Maybe this is a "weird" question, but I have my reasons/ideas ...
I was considering using 964s but have been offered a set of WebCam 20/21 at a good price.
I really want to hear your stories- experiences!


Here are my engine specs:
1979 engine block: boat tail web
Crank: standard 70.4mm. Alu pressure plate. Standart lightened and polished connecting rods (-100g each)
95mm wössner, or JE pistons. 11.3: 1 compretion (as light as you can get them, so I'm leaning towards wössner)
Exhaust: SSI. 2 in 2 out muffler. (the one I have is right through ... so I'll probably modify it slightly ... for the sake of my neighbors)
dual ignition, MS3 box, knock sensor.
Individual throttle body, and homemade intake manifold, their length is determined by final choice of cam, muffler, etc.

Cheers, mads
aka. Aircooled4evr
We went to Webcams 20/21 for better torque numbers - - but in a 964 3.6/3.8L w/JE 12.5 pistons on 100 Oct fuel - race car - direct replacement of OEM cams . . .w/ headers (no muffler) stock intake, crank and rods balanced, Wong dyno tuned chip . . .

Wish you the best on your engine build,
Regards
EDIT:
Agree with Ted . . . we did send cams and rockers to WebCam for refresh/modify
"should replace with new polished rockers when going to another new cam or used cam to allow work hardening process to repeat itself. "
__________________

2002 Porsche Boxster S Cobalt Blue/Blk/Blk
Crew Chief for Son's 1978 Porsche 911SC Original Porsche Mocha Brown 3.8L NASA race car
Previous Porsches: 1958 356 Red Coupe - 1972 914 Blue -1972 911T Coupe Aubergine

Last edited by Sboxin; 11-30-2019 at 04:24 PM.. Reason: correction - added info
Old 11-30-2019, 09:31 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
3rd_gear_Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,891
Garage
The cam rockers are work hardened and worn in from the first camshaft and the bushings are worn too, should replace with new polished rockers when going to another new cam or used cam to allow work hardening process to repeat itself.
__________________
1980 911 - Metzger 3.6L
2016 Cayman S
Old 11-30-2019, 01:48 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Denmark (EU)
Posts: 237
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rd_gear_Ted View Post
The cam rockers are work hardened and worn in from the first camshaft and the bushings are worn too, should replace with new polished rockers when going to another new cam or used cam to allow work hardening process to repeat itself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sboxin
Agree with Ted . . . we did send cams and rockers to WebCam for refresh/modify
"should replace with new polished rockers when going to another new cam or used cam to allow work hardening process to repeat itself. "
Thank you guys.

Fortunately, I was already going to do this myself, with a little help from my friends (not The Beetles)
So I don't need stronger valve springs then?
Old 12-01-2019, 02:45 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Denmark (EU)
Posts: 237
Garage
have any of you experienced with WebCam 20/21 and valve springs? Original or other?
Old 12-07-2019, 06:52 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Superman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lacey, WA. USA
Posts: 25,310
I have those cams. Stock valve springs. I left the rockers alone. There is controversy about the wisdom of resurfacing those. I LOVE these cams. The dyno guy stared at my power band, saying it looks like a V8 graph. Shaped like a table. Good, smooth power all the way from 1500 rpm to redline. Very driveable. If you are looking to squish all the power into the highest RPM bands, this is not the cam for you. If you are looking for good torque throughout the RPM range, then you will like these cams.

Also, in the early sixties there was emphasis on the "beat" of the new pop music. A band incorporated that nomenclature into its name. BEATles. Not beetles.
__________________
Man of Carbon Fiber (stronger than steel)

Mocha 1978 911SC. "Coco"
Old 12-07-2019, 09:54 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Targa_PB_78_SC
 
mike sampsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,568
Garage
I went with new OEM springs based on discussions with the gent doing my heads. Web cam stated stock valve springs are fine with the 20/21 cams.

So I’ve stock springs. All seems well with my first 400 miles on my rebuild
Changed exhaust, pistons and cylinders to 3.2 with 9.5 CR ratio. The car feels hungry.
Oh and I replaced all rockers which were not shiny smooth with ones which were.
__________________
BareRearedRookie

Last edited by mike sampsel; 12-07-2019 at 11:44 AM..
Old 12-07-2019, 11:42 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Denmark (EU)
Posts: 237
Garage
okay okay ... Beatles! Superman vs. Aircooled4evr 1-0
Old 12-08-2019, 07:23 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Denmark (EU)
Posts: 237
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superman View Post
I have those cams. Stock valve springs. I left the rockers alone. There is controversy about the wisdom of resurfacing those. I LOVE these cams.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike sampsel
I went with new OEM springs based on discussions with the gent doing my heads. Web cam stated stock valve springs are fine with the 20/21 cams.
Many thanks to you both! Then I'll try too!
Old 12-08-2019, 07:36 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Bay, ON
Posts: 472
Also been using 20/21's with stock valve train for many years now with no problems. Road and track use.
__________________
1986 3.2 to 3.4 conversion
Old 12-09-2019, 08:53 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)
ROW '78 911 Targa
 
timmy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 10,214
Garage
Good read on springs here:
A Performance killer in these small power output engines.
__________________
Dennis
Euro 1978 SC Targa, SSI's, Dansk 2/1, PMO ITBs, Electric A/C
Need a New Wiring Harness? PM or e-mail me. Search for "harnesses" in the classifieds.
Old 12-09-2019, 09:39 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #13 (permalink)
Evil Genius
 
Rusty Heap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: On top of my BBQ
Posts: 5,650
Garage
My 82 SC had Web 20/21's. SSI's and Monty single out muff.


Cams are very nice improvement over stock.


Fully usable torque below 4K rpm and 5-7K is heaven. fast rev, no regrets. all stock valve springs.

do it.
__________________
Life is a big ocean to swim in.

Wag more, bark less.
Old 12-09-2019, 03:13 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #14 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Denmark (EU)
Posts: 237
Garage
Thanks for your input!
I have been confirmed in my idea to use WebCam 21/21
They are now on the table, waiting to be fitted together with the rest of the new engine parts!
Old 07-16-2020, 09:01 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #15 (permalink)
Registered
 
Roger 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 862
Garage
I'm thinking about these for my basically stock 3.2 (cat bypass, modified OEM muffler). My question is whether the 20/21s require a custom chip/programming for the ECU. I have a Steve Wong chip now. Will this work?
__________________
'72 911 3.2
'18 Mustang Eco PP
'17 Mustang GT Conv
Old 09-29-2020, 04:36 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #16 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 522
You might be able to get away with a hotter cam on motronic? These cams were designed for CIS from memory. They maxed out the overlap, had high lift and short duration. Setup so as not to wreak havoc with the airflow sensor on CIS. I have them in a stock 3.0L and they certainly eeked a little more out and would highly recommend them to anyone looking to do not much to a 3.0L
Old 09-29-2020, 05:08 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #17 (permalink)
Registered
 
Roger 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 862
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenfield View Post
You might be able to get away with a hotter cam on motronic? These cams were designed for CIS from memory. They maxed out the overlap, had high lift and short duration. Setup so as not to wreak havoc with the airflow sensor on CIS. I have them in a stock 3.0L and they certainly eeked a little more out and would highly recommend them to anyone looking to do not much to a 3.0L
Maybe, but I think the limiting factor is piston/valve clearance. The SC/Carrera have very similar pistons. I'm good with the 20/21 profile, just want to see if anyone has any feedback on the ECU fuel map compatibility with these cams, especially with a Steve Wong Chip.
__________________
'72 911 3.2
'18 Mustang Eco PP
'17 Mustang GT Conv
Old 09-29-2020, 07:34 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #18 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Motown; Palm Beach
Posts: 1,267
Garage
You should check with Steve Wong. When I rebuilt my engine several years ago I included the 20/21 cams (they are great, BTW), Steve re-did the chip for me (I went to 3.4, MM pistons, etc.). Not sure what he changed specifically because of the new cams, though, but I have to assume it mattered.
__________________
'87 Carrera (3.4L) w/Turbo, full-bay IC; front bumper aux oil cooler, etc.
'07 Boxter
Old 09-30-2020, 03:46 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #19 (permalink)
Registered
 
Roger 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 862
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyle O View Post
You should check with Steve Wong. When I rebuilt my engine several years ago I included the 20/21 cams (they are great, BTW), Steve re-did the chip for me (I went to 3.4, MM pistons, etc.). Not sure what he changed specifically because of the new cams, though, but I have to assume it mattered.
I did send him an e-mail a few days ago, waiting to hear back. I've read that the Motronic system can accommodate and adjust for some changes, such as a slight displacement increase. I suspect the combination of cams AND increased displacement was outside that margin.

__________________
'72 911 3.2
'18 Mustang Eco PP
'17 Mustang GT Conv
Old 09-30-2020, 04:05 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #20 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.