engine carrier

[stephers]

Will an early engine carrier fit to a 3.2? 74-75 with a 3.2 conversion

Thanks, Rick

[Alex12]

Originally Posted by stephers

Will an early engine carrier fit to a 3.2? 74-75 with a 3.2 conversion

Thanks, Rick

Although the more recent "narrow-angle" sixty-degree Ford and GM V6 engines are more compact than the Rover/Buick and Ford V8's, (notably the Chevy 3.4L "L32"), they usually do not equal the power-to-weight ratio of the popular 90-degree V8's frequently swapped into smaller cars. These V6's can, however, be very cost effective and easier to fit into a variety of car bodies.

[wildcat077]

Rick,

Check out Rennline, they have nice stainless engine carriers, perhaps they can tell you if it's compatible or not.I have one in my 89 with a 95 3.6 engine swap and it worked for the 3.2 and the 3.6
Anyhow , i'm sure somebody will know more than me !

Not sure where the previous poster came from , perhaps he just read an old edition of Popular Mechanics and decided to share his knowledge ...
Alex , the 911 world is flat !!!

[redridge]

Originally Posted by Alex12

Although the more recent "narrow-angle" sixty-degree Ford and GM V6 engines are more compact than the Rover/Buick and Ford V8's, (notably the Chevy 3.4L "L32"), they usually do not equal the power-to-weight ratio of the popular 90-degree V8's frequently swapped into smaller cars. These V6's can, however, be very cost effective and easier to fit into a variety of car bodies.

troll much?