Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ottawa ON
Posts: 415
Garage
2.7 compression

Does 120-125 across all cylinders seem low for a 2.7 from a 77 911s?

Old 09-02-2015, 04:18 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
patz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Newport Beach CA
Posts: 1,873
If they are consistent, it's a runner. But 140 is what I would consider as "good".
__________________
I will use a FAF when I am dying of thirst
Old 09-02-2015, 04:23 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
76 911S Targa
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,150
Wayne Dempsey's book on rebuilding Porsche 911 engines is a good source on this topic. Look on pages 14-15 where he discusses this very topic. If the 2.7 is fitted with hotter cams, these readings may mean a good engine. If fitted with standard 2.7 cams, 120 is low. Also depends on how the test was done. The numbers are consistent which is good. Did you do the test yourself? Was the throttle wide open during the test? Did you add a tablespoon of motor oil to each cylinder and test again? Is this engine in Ontario or in Denver? In Denver, 125 psi is not bad. In Ontario, not so good.
__________________
76 911S, 2.7, Bursch Thermal Reactor Replacements, Smog Pump Removed, Magnecors, Silicone Valve Cover Gaskets, 11 Blade Fan, Carrera Oil Cooler, Turbo Tie Rods.
Old 09-02-2015, 04:58 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ottawa ON
Posts: 415
Garage
Yes in Ontario. Described as stock. Compression results are from a bench test by an experienced mechanic completed about 6 years ago before the motor was placed in storage.

Leak down numbers were 8-12% with one cylinder at 20%.
Old 09-02-2015, 05:04 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Max Sluiter
 
Flieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 19,644
Garage
If you assume 14.5psi atmospheric pressure then you should get 123psi gage with a 9.5:1 compression ratio and 100% VE. Your numbers sound good to me.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance
Old 09-02-2015, 06:12 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
abit off center
 
cgarr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: At the Airport Kentwood, MI
Posts: 7,311
Garage
Send a message via Yahoo to cgarr
You can change those numbers a lot by timing your cams different in a 2.7 too
__________________
______________________
Craig
G2Performance
Twinplug, head work, case savers, rockers arms, etc.
Old 09-02-2015, 06:51 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
gearhead
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,599
Am I the only one concerned by the leakdown?
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee
2009 Outback XT
2008 Cayman S shop test Mule
1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000
Old 09-02-2015, 06:52 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Wer bremst verliert
 
JohnJL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 4,767
I wouldnt place much faith in those numbers. Thats a few big gaps, a lot of time to pass and variables. Pretty leaky too.

What are you looking at and what are you trying to achieve?

Also here in Ontario....
__________________
2007 911 Turbo - Not a toy
1985 911 Cab - Wife's toy
1982 911 3.2 Indiash Rot Track Supercharged track toy
1978 911 3.0 Lichtbau toy "Gretchen"
1971 911 Targa S backroad toy
Old 09-02-2015, 07:40 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Functionista
 
manbridge 74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: CO
Posts: 7,717
My first 2.7 made 160-170 at 8500 ft. CIS with S cams. No idea on internals but it was a strong runner.
Old 09-02-2015, 07:53 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ottawa ON
Posts: 415
Garage
It's a basically complete motor but with carbs. I'm looking for something to drop in and run.
Old 09-02-2015, 08:29 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Project Addicted
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Eastern Shore. MD
Posts: 919
Here is a data point for you:



This was done on a '77 - 2.7 with 100K miles in storage for about the same amount of time, maybe a bit longer.

How was the test done?? All plugs out? Throttle wide open? strong battery? cranked until the needle would no longer rise?

On a cold engine that has been sitting it's a bit if a crap shoot with these tests.
__________________
Jon

1966 912
1976 911 3.4 Backdate Project
1986 944
Old 09-03-2015, 04:56 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ottawa ON
Posts: 415
Garage
Hi Jon, thanks for your post, if this motor showed those numbers it would be in the back of my truck already. It's because the comp seems low and the leakdown seems high that I'm concerned.

The guy who did the testing is a legendary porsche guy (heck he could find 6 year old detailed records in ten minutes) so my guess is his numbers are accurate.
Old 09-03-2015, 05:57 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: outta here
Posts: 54,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flieger View Post
If you assume 14.5psi atmospheric pressure then you should get 123psi gage with a 9.5:1 compression ratio and 100% VE. Your numbers sound good to me.
That's actually low for that compression ratio. Should be much higher.

A '77 didn't have 9.5:1, though. It had 8.5:1. His numbers are low, even for that compression ratio.

The leakdown numbers are worse.

If the test was done properly, that motor could use a rebuild.

JR
Old 09-03-2015, 06:59 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #13 (permalink)
Registered
 
Matthew_VA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: NoVA
Posts: 368
Garage
I think I know the answer to this but figured I'd post anyway... Looking at a '74 US Carrera with 132k miles. owner performed a comp test and got these figures:

Cylinder 1: 125
Cylinder 2: 135
Cylinder 3: 135
Cylinder 4: 125
Cylinder 5: 150
Cylinder 6: 150

assuming these aren't great since not consistent and that cylinders 1 & 4 are 25 psi off.
__________________
TBD
Prior: '84 911 3.2 Carrera, '83 911SC Targa
IG: @heuersandcarreras

"I want to use it. That's what 911s are for." - Richard Hammond
Old 11-13-2025, 10:51 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #14 (permalink)
PCA Member since 1988
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: SW Washington State
Posts: 4,473
Garage
You know the answer. Plus, with 132Kmi, it's probably time for a head refresh, and once you go that far, check the pistons, rings, and cylinders, and then the slippery slope to opening up the bottom end.

On the plus side, it's a 1974, which did not have the thermal reactor, which increased operating temps, which increased magnesium case distortion. You're not in CA, but 1974 is easier to register in CA, since it's exempt from smog testing.

For the right price and condition, I would buy it. Just figure a future rebuild or engine swap into your offer. Then drive the piss out of it until you have to rebuild it. Which you may never do if you don't drive it pretty frequently.
__________________
1973.5 911T with RoW 1980 SC CIS stroked to 3.2, 10:1 Mahle Sport p/c's, TBC exhaust ports, M1 cams, SSI's. RSR bushings & adj spring plates, Koni Sports, 21/26mm T-bars, stock swaybars, 16x7 Fuchs w Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 205/55-16 at all 4 corners.

Cars are for driving. If you want art, get something you can hang on the wall!
Old 11-13-2025, 04:24 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #15 (permalink)
Registered
 
Jeff Alton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Langley,B.C.
Posts: 12,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew_VA View Post
I think I know the answer to this but figured I'd post anyway... Looking at a '74 US Carrera with 132k miles. owner performed a comp test and got these figures:

Cylinder 1: 125
Cylinder 2: 135
Cylinder 3: 135
Cylinder 4: 125
Cylinder 5: 150
Cylinder 6: 150

assuming these aren't great since not consistent and that cylinders 1 & 4 are 25 psi off.

Was the test done with fuel pump relay removed, battery charger connected and WOT?

Cheers

__________________
Turn3 Autosport- Full Service and Race Prep
www.turn3autosport.com
997 S 4.0, Cayman S 3.8, Cayenne Turbo, Macan Turbo, 69 911, Mini R53 JCW , RADICAL SR3
Old 11-16-2025, 07:47 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #16 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:31 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.