Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   911T Engine to S specs? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/127342-911t-engine-s-specs.html)

blackbird225 09-14-2003 05:58 AM

911T Engine to S specs?
 
What would it take to get the same performance numbers of an 1970 S in a 1970 T? Is it just MFI or a host of tweaks? I know that this has probably been tossed around before, but I thought I might dig it out again.
TIA,
michael

Peterfrans 09-14-2003 06:24 AM

A S has compared to a T the following differences:
forged pistons, giving higher compression, biral barrels
nitrated conrods
higher lift, more duration camshaft.
Heads with bigger ports and valves
a counterweighted crankshaft which copes better with high rpm's (at which the S has its max power)

You would at least need pistons, cams, and heads if you would stick with carbs. A MFI setup would offer another 10hp in the same setup.

In all no simple tweaks. If you are considering to go this way you could also opt for a short stroke 2.5

exc911ence 09-14-2003 07:21 AM

How about the T and the E spec engines. Would this be a simpler upgrade?

Randy Webb 09-14-2003 09:35 AM

Worse than that -- the T's crank is not counterwt'd so it may not last of reel well at high revs. PAG used a base T engine for some races but I dunno how often they had to rebuild it.

Unless you find a new crank and a lot of other items, you should think about swapping in a whole new engine. What's your goal? A built 2.7L is a great project and can be very fast. My '73 T had a stock 2.7L when I bought it, and I am putting in a hotrodded 3.2. The sky is the limit -- or at least a hotrod 3.8 is the limit. That will be enough to kill the unwary in short order.

Take a look at BA's book and also the "best engines" chart in Wayne's book.

silverc4s 09-14-2003 10:36 AM

I think there are a few racers on this board the use or have used the non-counterweighted crank with good results...don't just throw it in the trash.

Peterfrans 09-14-2003 10:58 AM

The crank is strong enough, the problem is a non counterweighted crank puts more stress on the main bearings. Apparantly Porsche decided that this was permissable for the lower reving T but not for the E and S. For the 2.4 all cranks are counterweighted.
Racers like this crank as it is lighter, and therefore revs easier (just like a lightened flywheel), the higher wear on the bearings is not such an issue in these applications as these engines are probably opened more often.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.