![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
![]()
I'm thinking about upgrading my T to S specs (and most importantly horsepower!). What are my options? How involved, exactly, would that upgrade be? I know that the S engine has higher compression and that the fuel injection is different? I'm no gearhead. What am I looking at?
Thanks. Brian Hensarling |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Brian, it certainly can be done. Your's is the last of the carburated T engines so you don't have the mechanical injection you'd need to go to full original S specs. You could
1. Use your engine, upgrade to S pistons and cylinders, heads with correct valve sizes, S cams and use Weber carbs (40 IDS) and have a very nice engine. With this conversion you can use your existing fuel system including the pump. 2. Upgrade your engine to S specs and find an original S mechanical injection system. You'd have to change your fuel pump, lines etc. More expensive than above option but closer to the real S. 3. Find a later original S motor and install it with all the right pieces already installed. If your engine is tired and ready for a rebuild, why not go to S specs, the carburated upgrade of your engine is a nice way to go.
__________________
Bruce Herrmann 97 C4S '04 330i '08 Cayenne S '07 4.8 X-5 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 2,062
|
As Gibson mentioned it can be done, its just a matter of $. I also believe the crank was different for the S to allow for higher RPM.
You may not need to ditch the Zeniths either if you still have them as there are places that you can still get what you need to rebuild them. Mine still work great. The other consideration to look at is what will you be using the engine for? Yes the S has more HP but you dont see that until the upper RPM range, which might not be the best for street driving. The T I think actually had a faster 0-60 time do the torque curve. Where are you located? You might check around your local area (PCA) and see if other early cars exsist and maybe get a feel for what the differences are. (if you are close to me, my 71 is good for a test drive) Im sure the trans plant guys will chime in soon. For the cost of what you are looking to do you could spend a little more and do a trans plant if HP is what you are looking for. I opted to keep my 2.2 when I did a rebuild and dont regret it one bit. ![]()
__________________
Dan Byers |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 374
|
What about going to solex cams, wouldn't you have more power on the bottom and top end? How much power do solex cams produce as compared to S cams. One of the recommended engines in Wayne's book is a 2.2 with S heads and solex cams.
__________________
Sam Gonzales '69 912 2.0 -6 power |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Wow, so much info and so quick! I love this board!
Really what I was looking for was a bit more punch. I'm not a racer or anything, so daily drivability is my main goal. Just looking for a little more Porsche behind that gas pedal. What are the main differences, performance and mechanical, between the Zeniths and the Webers? I'm only 22, fresh out of college with student loans breathing down my neck, so $$$ are definitely a bit tight. You guys got any ideas on what might be my best choices for bang for my buck? I was thinking the upgrade to S would be the way to go, but if there are better ways to squeeze a bit more quickness out of her, I'm all ears. I really appreciate the quick responses, and as always I humbly bask in the glow of enlightened Porschephiles!
__________________
Brian Hensarling '89 C4: Gran Prix White brianhensarling@hotmail.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 2,062
|
Well just a thought and a route I might take is to have leak down and compression check done (how many mile on the engine?). When was the last time the carbs and valves were adjusted? Have that done also if you cant remember or dont know. A valve, carb adjust and an overall tune up can bring back some lost power. Once you have this info you can judge how much time is left in that 2.2 you have and really be able to think long term.
I know it may not sound right but also your suspension has seen a few miles and may need to be refreshed. You would be suprised how much lighter and better your T will handle with some fresh suspension. Exhaust is also a place where a few ponys can be had. SSIs with sport exhuast is good for a few HP and $$. Just thinking out load here, excuse me if I am off base. ![]()
__________________
Dan Byers |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
![]()
Brian,
You don't say whether or not the 911 is your only daily driver ... but that will place certain constraints on the practicality of an upgrade. Additional hp raises the need for an external front oil cooler, among other things, for long-term reliability! One option is to bore your existing cylinders to 85.0 mm and get 9.5:1 JE pistons with valve reliefs for radical cams like 'S' or GE-60's, and for low-cost you can retain your carbs and only lose 10 hp or so ... 170 - 175 hp is feasible, and usable with 91 octane gas! A 7000 rpm redline is realistic with your crankshaft. Porting your existing heads is optional ... bottom end and mid-range torque would be better by leaving the ports alone and running the hotter cams. You would only lose 5 -10 hp at the top end. All 2.2 thru 2.7 engines use the same basic head casting and valve sizes -- 46 mm intakes and 40 mm exhaust. A good compromise would be to open your ports to 33 mm - 34 mm, up from existing 30 mm, and a bit under the 'S' and 'RS' ports of 36 mm. At one time the factory offered rallye engines based on 'T' heads, but with the carburetion and cams of the 'S' engine -- only 10 hp less than the 'S' engine of the day! The bottom-end torque was said to be improved, but I don't have the exact specs. The first three books you need are Bruce Anderson's Porsche 911 Performance Handbook and Wayne's two books from this website.
__________________
Warren Hall, Jr. 1973 911S Targa ... 'Annie' 1968 340S Barracuda ... 'Rolling Thunder' Last edited by Early_S_Man; 10-17-2003 at 11:06 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Double Trouble
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: North of Pittsburgh
Posts: 11,705
|
I believe the connecting rods were different in the S motor also. My .02 would be to find an S motor and be done with it. The S motor especially 2.2 is a "peaky" engine and not very friendly cold, at low RPM, and in traffic. They start to breath at about 4200 RPM and rip to 7200. I find myself driving in 3rd and 4th gear a lot. The E cams are a lot more driveable and make their power lower in the band. S cars are crabby SOB's
__________________
I used to be addicted to the hokey pokey..........but I turned myself around.. 75 914 1.8 2010 Cayenne base |
||
![]() |
|
Somewhere in the Midwest
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the barn!
Posts: 12,499
|
Having been a college grad
![]() If you want to really enjoy the car, take it to the track. It will cost less (initially) than an engine. You'll feel like a superstar and on the streets you won't have to have gobs of power to race the Mustangs...'cuse you'll know better ![]() Man I like to preach...just don't be in the car with me when the punks in the hood ride up to me and ask for a race ![]() No, really, join the PCA and got to a few Driver's Educations per year until you are really ready to start dumping money into Porsching. With DE's you'll discover the limits of your ability and your car while having a great time. You'll meet good people and learn a lot from them. I think that'll be more beneficial to you than a new engine. Last edited by MotoSook; 10-18-2003 at 09:19 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Okay, let me fill in some blanks...
-The 71 T is a daily driver with 116000 miles on it. -All original, no rebuilds or mods. -I'm definitely not looking for "crabby" or "peaky" performance, I just wanted to add a bit of zip to my T if possible without changing the power band or many other lovable characteristics! My next step is definitely picking up those three books. I really appreciate everyone's suggestions! Thanks for helping out a young Porsche lover!
__________________
Brian Hensarling '89 C4: Gran Prix White brianhensarling@hotmail.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
I would keep carbs on it -- at least for a while.
Don't the T's have different struts? You could put S type struts on it and use the Al S calipers, or just replace the entire suspension with one from a Carrera -- that would save some wt. in the rear. If the Carrera calipers aren't good enough for you, then put the (44T calipers on (see Bill V for more info). There is also the matter of guages, trim, etc. For the engine I would not stop at S specs -- I'd go to RS with a 2.7 or even bigger. Why make a T into an S when you can make it into something a lot better -- more powerful and lighter. |
||
![]() |
|
drag racing the short bus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Location, Location...
Posts: 21,983
|
I like Souk's idea. Save the bucks; pay off life. Buy stocks, and from all I've experienced, T's spank S's in everything but all-out high RPM driving.
__________________
The Terror of Tiny Town |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NoCal
Posts: 2,416
|
umm, what Souk said
![]() -Jim |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea.
Posts: 37,703
|
hensarl, if you crack open that engine, be prepared to spend gabs of money. Auther Wayne and partner at Pelican says the minimum expenditure is $6000 with you doing the assembly and reinstall of the engine. Many 3.0's go for half of that. And I mean ones that are not tired. A 2.2 S motor is rated at 180 HP. The 3.0 is in that neighborhood with smooth, reliable performance. That leaves you the rest of the money for other improvements to the car. All in all, you'd have more car that way rather than chasing the S mystic. The 2.7 RS advice is good if you have the coin.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,518
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
Yes, it's all about coin. Why don't you think about the advantages and disadvantages of immediate (relatively speaking) gratification, then post a $$ figure and what direction you are interested in going (outlaw, concours, daily drinker -- I mean driver, etc.). We are all willing to help you spend your money.
|
||
![]() |
|
drag racing the short bus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Location, Location...
Posts: 21,983
|
Quote:
Sounds like you found out first hand what I've already said when this guy waved ![]() ![]()
__________________
The Terror of Tiny Town |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Brian, where are you located ? I may have a deal you cant refuse. Im doing a motor swap in a 1969 T and it has a 2.2 T motor that was (according to the past owner) just fully overhauled and converted to S specs. The engine is still in the car and runs like a scalded dog. Its just as powerful as my 2.7 motor and sounds better as well. I will be selling the motor in about 1 month. It is in the car ready to be test driven. You could see what it would feel like before you buy it. I would likely want your old motor as a partial payment. I will be looking to get somewhere in the neighborhood of $2200.00(or $1600.00 with your old motor) for the engine without carbs , but with recently new 3 into one exhangers and a sweet sounding aftermarket muffler as well as the fan/alt and oil cooler. I could also do the swap for you for around $500.00 if its during the winter months. The motor is clean, burns "NO" oil and does not leak any oil (yet). PM me if interested.
Kurt
__________________
Never drive faster than your gaurdian angel can fly. 82 SC w/965S eng and G50 6:1 hp/w ratio 72 911t 2.6 twin plug and 72' 911t 57k orig 1 own miles 65/66 912 1 owner 76k orig 01' Aston Martin DB7 V12 Vantage Coupe 6spd |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Oh and brian, im also open to all trades.
Kurt Williams
__________________
Never drive faster than your gaurdian angel can fly. 82 SC w/965S eng and G50 6:1 hp/w ratio 72 911t 2.6 twin plug and 72' 911t 57k orig 1 own miles 65/66 912 1 owner 76k orig 01' Aston Martin DB7 V12 Vantage Coupe 6spd |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea.
Posts: 37,703
|
Jeez, what a deal. I'd be on his doorstep, but I'm on the West Coast. That hurts so bad I have to bite my tongue.
Edit: That is if it really is an S spec engine complete with aluminum cylinders and passes leak down with excellent figures. Last edited by Zeke; 10-19-2003 at 06:25 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|