![]() |
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 539
|
The Beast Supercharger....can be yours.
Fellow Pelican Heads, since there were inquires about selling my supercharger setup when I decided to twin turbo, I wanted to let the board know it is now on ebay. If anyone has any questions, please feel free to ask (off list though since its off topic).
|
||
![]() |
|
Montana 911
|
damn that is a sweet deal....xmas list
__________________
H.D. Smith 2009 997.2 S 3.8 PDK 2019 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4 Baby Raptor 2019 Can Am Renegade 1000R XC 2020 Yamaha YFZ450R |
||
![]() |
|
Author of "101 Projects"
|
Actually, you can ask questions here, as it is a most interesting setup...
-Wayne
__________________
Wayne R. Dempsey, Founder, Pelican Parts Inc., and Author of: 101 Projects for Your BMW 3-Series • 101 Projects for Your Porsche 911 • How to Rebuild & Modify Porsche 911 Engines • 101 Projects for Your Porsche Boxster & Cayman • 101 Projects for Your Porsche 996 / 997 • SPEED READ: Porsche 911 Check out our new site: Dempsey Motorsports |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sparta, Georgia
Posts: 44
|
Maybe I didn't look at the specs but how much power did you get from your 3.0? How many pounds of boost were you running? You did an exceptional job on that engine. Tell us more about the twin turbo setup and the power you are getting along with some more pics please.
__________________
1986 930 1978 911SC Targa 2003 Cad. Esc. 2002 GMC Sierra 2002 Acura Stype 1999 Honda Pass 1987 Chev PU |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 1,041
|
looks like I'm bidding against wayne...
what will I need on this to bolt it up to my 3.0?
__________________
1992 964 C4 Coupe (black/black) 1982 911SC Coupe (lt blue met/black) 1965 Mustang Fastback (black/black) |
||
![]() |
|
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
I just jacked the price up a little, Sorry wayne
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 1,041
|
wayne, just curious, why you would want this? your 911-less now...
__________________
1992 964 C4 Coupe (black/black) 1982 911SC Coupe (lt blue met/black) 1965 Mustang Fastback (black/black) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Nice pro setup. Mark did you fab this up from scratch?
__________________
Warren & Ron, may you rest in Peace. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 222
|
Sorry if this is a stupid question but…
Isn’t the intercooler on the wrong side of the blower? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chelmsford, MA
Posts: 872
|
Mmmmmmm supercharged 2.0...
![]()
__________________
1968 911L 2004 Dodge Dakota SLT Plus |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,518
|
Why go from a supercharged setup to twin turbo? What is the hp/torque difference? What's the advantage of 2 turbo's over one? Why? Why? Why?
__________________
1980 911SC Targa 3.6L |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,955
|
Quote:
What's the logic behind jacking the price up so early? |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
B58/732
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Hot as Hell, AZ
Posts: 12,313
|
Hey, it's my birthday this Thursday. Whoever wins the auction let me know and I'll send you my address.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ I don't always talk to vegetarians--but when I do, it's with a mouthful of bacon. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,911
|
Quote:
That's a simple explanation.
__________________
Thank you for your time, Last edited by beepbeep; 11-10-2003 at 08:00 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2007 Mazda 3 hatch 1972 Porsche 914 roller with plenty of holes to fix ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 222
|
will if i'm not wrong this is what the engine is from what I can see:
Base motor - 78 3.0L Re-conditioned, Re-Nikasiled 3.2L cylinders 8.5:1 forged JE pistons with lightweight pins Hastings rings Re-conditioned connecting rods ARP case studs and rod bolts 993 Super Sport cam profile Complete head/valve job with high performance springs Twin plug conversion Crank fire ignition Haltech engine management system with complete injection and ignition programmability. 22 fuel and ignition programmable maps for every 500 RPM increment. ECU inputs include: boost level, intake charge temp, O2 ratio, RPM, throttle position, cylinder head temp, etc. Eaton M62 supercharger running 2:1 overdrive ratio producing @ 8lbs of boost (adjustable) Custom fabricated induction system including intercooler SSI's and stainless Powertune mufflers Is it just me or is the intercooler on the wrong side of the blower? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 193
|
The infamous supercharger vs. turbo-supercharger debate.
Looks like I will have to defend the superchargers again. While it is true that turbos use a (wasted) form of energy-exhaust, and the supercharger doesn't, the turbo isn't exactly "free" either. As anyone who has ever changed a muffler or exhaust system for a more "free flowing" exhaust knows, any restriction to exhaust flow costs power. Now, add a turbo to the exhaust flow and you are causing a restriction. Yes, the benefits outweigh (quite substantially I will add) the price of restriction, I am just trying to show that they aren't "free" power. I like superchargers for several reasons: They are basically a "plug and play" setup. Bolt it on and have fun, whereas a turbo setup is much more complicated to plumb (exhaust has to be professionally bent and welded no mild carbon steel here, intercoolers are almost mandatory then there's waste gates, boost controllers, etc) too much boost on the blower? Change the pulley. Want a little more? Change the pulley. The supercharger's power is very linear. It produces power as a function of engine speed whereas the turbo (depending on size and type) requires time to "spool up" so the lower end power is not as great. A turbo system will produce more heat than a supercharger (ever tried to put your hand on a turbo while its running? Don't) The efficiency question has once again come up and I once again respectfully disagree. As far as lasting longer and having fewer parts, I don't agree with that either. Put your turbo parts next to a complete blower setup and you will see what I mean. There are literally thousands of superchargers on cars today, they have a HUGE following with the mustang and camaro crowd (not to mention sport compacts). American car makers build blower motors at the factory (along with turbos) busses, tractors, even bulldozers use blowers almost indefinately. To help with the question on why twin turbos. A turbo uses a turbine and a compressor. The compressor will flow a specific amount of air at a specific rpm. The larger the compressor, the more air it will flow. The larger the compressor, the larger the turbine needed and of couse more motive force (in this case exhaust gas). If you want a turbo to support a 3.0l motor at 6800 rpm then it has to flow enough air. If you use one turbo, it has to be large and maybe not spool up until 4000 rpm (not good for low speed driving). Now if you take two smaller turbos they only have to support half the motors need for air. They therefore spool up faster and are more "responsive" this is very advantageous for the street. This in addition of couse with what 1fastredsc said. In conclusion, after having built and run both types on everything from drag cars to street cars to airplanes, I let the situation and $$$ available make my determination on which to run. For instance, I don't have any room on the front of my motor right now, so I will be building a turbo motor. But my 69 camaro is getting a blower. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Irrationally exuberant
|
Quote:
![]() The fan pulley turns clockwise, so the blower is pumping air out the top/right into the intercooler. -Chris
__________________
'80 911 Nogaro blue Phoenix! '07 BMW 328i 245K miles! http://members.rennlist.org/messinwith911s/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 222
|
Gotcha Crise…thanx
It looked like the blower was on top of the intake |
||
![]() |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 539
|
Samh – I never did put the supercharged motor on a dyno so I can’t say for sure on the power output. It had a ton of torque, to say the least. Chainsaw comes to mind. It would also depend on what motor its put on and what type of modifications (if any) have been done to that motor. I ran @ 10-12 lbs of boost, which is adjustable by changing the pulley on the SC.
RickM – Yes, I fab’d it all from scratch. No, I will never get my money out of it (I don’t even think about the hours). Frostie - Don’t know what you mean about the IC being on the wrong side. All – I really didn’t intend to have this start into a huge turbo versus SC debate. It’s safe to say they both have their strengths and weaknesses. All – I have been asked a lot about whether or not it would fit a particular motor. It will fit any motor, and not bolt on to any motor! As the auction indicates, it’s not a kit so if you are not mechanically inclined and can do some fabrication, please don’t apply. However, I am more than willing to help in any way I can with whomever ends up with my baby. |
||
![]() |
|