![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
1967 911 engine differences
1967 911 engine differences
911s v. 911 180 hp v. 130 why? Thank You. Regards,
__________________
Bernard |
||
![]() |
|
RETIRED
|
S cams and higher compression.....it's the motor "I" have in my 914/6.....FUN
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London Ont Canada
Posts: 3,120
|
The basics are used by most manufacturers to increase power. Different cam timing,higher compression ,bigger valves, larger ports,less restrictive exhaust,larger carbs,etc. Various mods to maintain reliability at higher power level such as forged pistons and crank instead of cast ,and better oil cooling. Porsche used all this and more , some changes eventually were adapted to lesser engines as years progressed.
__________________
1980 911 SC 3.6 coupe sold 1995 993 coupe 1966 Mustang Shelby clone 1964 Corvair Spyder Turbo gone 2012 Boss 302 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
So basically have to determine what engines were in a given year 911, then when have a car to look at the numbers on the engine will tell me what case it is. Knowing what P&Cs/Comp Ratio, Cams would be based on service history or actually when I would tear it down to do a top end rebuild.
To me it seems like 50hp+ is important. Thanks for your input. Regards,
__________________
Bernard |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 668
|
It is more than a matter of hp. The 'S' -- from 67 to 73 -- is a disproportionately valued and valuable car.
__________________
1984 RoW Cabriolet - GP White |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Actually it's 160 vs 130 hp. Cams, valves, pistons and a less restrictive exhaust system make up the difference.
__________________
John |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |