1992 Turbo S

[Hayabusa]

A TOTAL OF TWENTY FIVE MADE! WHO HAS ONE? WHAT ARE THEY WORTH?

[Hayabusa]

Wow. Thirty plus hits and no one knows a single thing about this AMAZING car?

[kycarguy 935]

found this info but will do more checking on a value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

911 Turbo 3.3 - with increased engine output

Vehicle Type 911 Turbo 3.3 - with increased engine output
Engine Type Type M 30/69 S
Model Year '92 (N)
General As of Model Year '92 (N), the 3.3 Turbo was made available with an engine with increased output under the Exclusive Special Option No. "X 33".
As the specifications of this engine have so far not been published, we herewith provide you with a brief description of this engine.
Description 3.3 litre Turbo engine "X 33" with increased output
Engine Type M 30/69 S
Displacement 3299 c.c. (3.3 I)
Output 261 kW (355 HP)
Torque 471 Nm (48 kpm) at 5,000 rpm

Scope of modifications

* Cylinder head, inlet and exhaust ports modified
* Inlet manifold modified
* modified camshafts
* Valve timing (setting) 0.9 - 1.1.

Modified Parts
Part no. Part designation Quantity
930.105.147.50 Camshaft, left-hand 1
930.105.148.50 Camshaft, right-hand 1
911.105.171.02 Spacer flange, left-hand 1
911.105.172.02 Spacer flange, right-hand 1
900.067.082.02 Bolt 4
N 010.183.1 Bolt 1*
930.113.025.03 Gearwheels 1
N 013.349.1 Roll pin 2
930.100.908.03 Gasket set 1
930.104.043.14 Cylinder head 6

Note: The parts indicated - without the * symbol - are only available from the Porsche AG - Kundenzentrum (Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen)!
Phone 0711-827 5290/5488/5602, Telefax 0711-827 6227, Telex 7252 5141
Engine Type M 30/69S With catalytic converter
No. of cylinders 6
Bore 97 mm
Stoke 74.4 mm
Displacement to 88/76/EEC 3299 c.c.
Compression ratio 7.0:1
Engine power to 80/1269/EEC 261 kW (355 HP)
At crankshaft speed 5,000 rpm
Output per liter 79.1 kW/l (107.6 HP/l)
Minimum fuel octance rating RON 95/MON 85 (unleaded Premium to DIN 51 607 only)
Fuel consumption (litres/100 km)
(to 80/1268/EEC or ECE A 70)
at 90 km/h 8.5
at 120 km/h 10.4
city driving cycle 21.0
Engine oil consumption up to 1.5 L/1000 km
Max. permissible engine rpm 6,800 + 100 rpm
Spark plugs Bosch WR 4 DPO
Plug gap 0.6 + 0.1 mm
Battery 12 V, 72 Ah
Generator Alternator, 1610 W / 115 A
Firing order 1-6, 2-4, 3-5
Ignition Electronic-map ignition system.
Caution: High voltage! Working on the ignition system and rev counter may be hazardous
Fan drive belt 9.5 x 776 La Use only genuine fan belts approved by Porsche
Drive belt for A/C compressor/alternator Polyrib 14 11 K6
Valve clearance (engine cold) Inlet and exhaust valves: 0.10 mm
Performance figures *
Max speed 280 km/h
Acceleration 0 - 100 km/h 4.7 seconds
Kilometer with standing start 22.7
* At DIN curb weight and half-laden vehicle without performance-reducing special equipment
Tire pressure - 911 Turbo S
(valid for cold tires)
Summer tires Winter tires
- front 2.5 bar gauge (36 psi) - front 2.5 bar gauge (36 psi)
- front 3.0 bar gauge (44 psi) - front 3.0 bar gauge (44 psi)

[Jgordon]

I know it's pretty....

[ZAMIRZ]

Originally posted by Hayabusa
Wow. Thirty plus hits and no one knows a single thing about this AMAZING car?

You could try searching this site and google

[Hayabusa]

Well, do you think because of my post count I am new to the internet?

Searches were done. This site offered nothing.

There is not a lot of information on it on the net and the only pics I can find of it are from the one licensed in somewhere in the asian (possibly Japan) countries.

I guess they are pretty rare and not to be found. Too bad, because I want one.

[twait01]

If I remember correctly:
The Turbo S was a special version of the Turbo 3.3 that was meant to celebrate Porsche winning the IMSA supercar championship. It had uprated components like brakes, different cams, and ran higher boost than the standard car. I believe that it had 381HP as oppossed to the standard Turbo's 315. It was kind of track oriented though, power was tilted even more towards the top of the tach than the standard car. For everyday driving and speed I think the 94' Turbo 3.6 would be better. What it loses in ultimate HP it makes up in more and more evenly spread torque. Car and Driver tested one of these Turbo S, you could maybe look up the article in the library. As for value, I think it would be higher than the standard turbo and will maintain that value simply by its exclusivity.

[Eric Coffey]

Yup, 380+ hp, carbon everywhere, and only 80 made. There were a couple full-race LM versions made/raced too (480hp monsters with detuned 962 motors).

[trader220]

try rennlists 964 turbo board there are several threads about these cars on there.

[slow&rusty]

Wow...beautiful...only 25 made...crap cakes...that makes it a rare bird.

Yasin

[Eric Mckenna]

I know a guy who has a Turbo S but it's a flachblau. flatnose...
I know it's ONE BAD MOTHER! and yes very low production numbers...
His is the same as that pictured but it doesn't have the frog eyes..

If you have a lead on one BUY IT !!!!!!!!!

-Eric

[}{arlequin]

I used to have a roommate who had one... (his family owned several golfcourses in Asia, so he didn't lack any $$)

That is an amazing car. Still my favorite factory turbo due to rwd, as well as "normal" looks unlike the GT2.

[Eric Mckenna]

Here is one that is JUST like my friend's.....
great machines!!!

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4560204662&sspagename=ADME%3AB%3ASS%3AUS%3A1

-Eric

[trader220]

I could live without the flat nose look

[930LDR]

I actually think that the true flat nose (not slope nose) is one of the most beautiful turbos ever created...

Also try the attached link for turbo history / facts

http://www.porscheclubgb.com/uploads/registers/53/
http://www.911turbo.com/turboclub/history/history.html

Cya

[raceman]

shame about the rain gutters..

[bigrubberjeep]

IMO - The sexiest production 911 ever. I'll take one in black please.

[RickM]

The factory called it Flachblau/Flatnose. Not Slant, slope or anything else. So no difference other than style as the years went on.

Eric, If I understand correctly the '92 is a 3.3 car and the 94 is a 3.6.

[Eric Mckenna]

i LOVE THE CLASSIC LOOK OF THE 911.. BUT THE 3.6 TURBO S FLATNOSE IS REALLY A GREAT LOOKING CAR

[Dignan]

Originally posted by Jgordon
I know it's pretty....

but i didnt pull it out for air