![]() |
|
|
|
MiamiTurbo
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 416
|
More Power!
Hello all, hope all is well. Well it seems like we are waiting for another hurricane here in S florida! (This Sucks) I'm seriously considering moving to the desert! Anyway, I want more zing out of my 86 3.2 911. Should I start with exhaust and cams and such, or just bite the bullet and do a Turbo or SC conversion? If I go the boost route, would my recently rebuilt 915 take it? Please help!
__________________
wanabe911 owner 1974 914 2156cc project 2005 Lotus Elise Original owner 2002 996TT Tip |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
boost is cheaper per horsepower but a big investment. if you don't have emissions laws the normal upgrades would be SSI heat exhangers, dual in muffler, 964 cams, steve wong chip. there should be some posts on this board of dyno charts for a similar engine.
How do you like the elise?
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Encinitas (San Diego CA)
Posts: 4,495
|
Shed your car's weight. 12 lbs to 15lbs = 1 HP, more or less at your car's weight. A few hundred lbs = 20 to 30HP. The more you lose, the greater the increase in HP / weight.
Doug
__________________
1971 RSR - interpretation |
||
![]() |
|
MiamiTurbo
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 416
|
KobaltBlau: Thanks for the response, the Elise is great! Light weight, great handling, nimble! Not very practical, and makes my a$$ numb from the seats!
__________________
wanabe911 owner 1974 914 2156cc project 2005 Lotus Elise Original owner 2002 996TT Tip |
||
![]() |
|
MiamiTurbo
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 416
|
DW SD : Without removing the A/C, what else can I do to shed weight, glass bumpers, fenders, etc?
__________________
wanabe911 owner 1974 914 2156cc project 2005 Lotus Elise Original owner 2002 996TT Tip |
||
![]() |
|
MiamiTurbo
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 416
|
KobaltBlau: If I went the N/A route, and did not want heat, which header would you recommend
__________________
wanabe911 owner 1974 914 2156cc project 2005 Lotus Elise Original owner 2002 996TT Tip |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 4,740
|
Quote:
And while your at it you might do a search on why our 3.2's feel so slow. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Encinitas (San Diego CA)
Posts: 4,495
|
Quote:
You mentioned a number of items, which help. Interiors weigh a lot, as does insulation (under carpet and rear seats), a pair of factory seats is ~ 100lbs where some FG buckets are 30lbs. Center console, etc. Rear seats have some weight, too. Lightweight battery reduces weight and if moved to closer to the center of the car reduces polar moment of inertia (good for responsiveness). Check out this link written by some of our fanatical 911 brethren: http://www.rennlight.com/light/index.html Doug
__________________
1971 RSR - interpretation |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,108
|
Doug, the lightweight aarticle didn't mention AC. I am guessing that the AC would add 60lbs total. This is good reference...I would like to delete the sunroof and AC but don't want to upset the F/R balance.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Chevy Small block....
![]()
__________________
Gary R. |
||
![]() |
|
MiamiTurbo
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 416
|
stlrj: Did a tune up already, and I never said my car feels slow, I would however like to modify it for more power.
In relation to my Elise, and my EVO yes my 3.2 feels and is slow, but I did not buy my 3.2 for the speed, I purchased it because I always wanted a Porsche, and I enjoy driving it. I however can never leave well enough alone! The reason I am asking for advice is, I want the benefit of the experience of this board... You may not rmember but you were very helpfull when I first got my car a year ago and had the hesitation problem.
__________________
wanabe911 owner 1974 914 2156cc project 2005 Lotus Elise Original owner 2002 996TT Tip |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Encinitas (San Diego CA)
Posts: 4,495
|
Quote:
Find a car to ride in that has been modified by minimizing weight at the ends of the vehicle, as well as stripped down in general and you will notice a massive difference. Doug
__________________
1971 RSR - interpretation |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA USA
Posts: 2,938
|
I also felt my SC was slow. So being that I love boost I put a turbo motor in my car. Holy ***** batman it ain't slow no mo. So my advice is to either turbo your car or sell it and buy a 930. The 930 route would be cheaper in the long run I think. And no I don't think the 915 will handle the boost for long.
Dean
__________________
Dean 911 SC turbo, 3.0L 930 motor, G50, 930 brakes, DTA EFI, 352 RWHP DynoDynamic dyno, |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 4,740
|
From a cost per ponie perspective, how can you beat a turbo?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 546
|
Straight line speed.....turbo. But you're better off starting with a 930.
Cornering speed.....suspension and weight reduction. A little of both for a lot of money......engine work. Standard route for most guys appears to follow: Chip (Steve Wong's as good as it gets) and SSI's and muffler. Often a rebuild can bring a tired car up to specs. Some cars are under by a long way. Then prepare to access your Swiss bank account..... Engine management such as Motec in conjuction with above then brings you 260-270 bhp. 964 M64 cams are nice, but if you change to high compression race pistons you can go S cams. Very nice. Six independent throttle bodies on top again and 300-320bhp. But by here you have spend sooooo much money it'll make your eyes water. Capacity increase is another way. 3.4 or 3.5 plus cams and SSI's can net reasonable gains. Then you look at engine swaps with later model 3.6's which will buy you best bang for bucks but less so than a 930 Much simpler route will be lightening the car. AC's weight 60lbs Seats swaps can net 40lbs Removing the sound insulation under the carpet is good for 40lbs. Your bumpers and engine lid and bonnet and doors and sunroof can all go fibreglass. Another path ca be swapping to a close ratio gear set. That will feel like 30+ bhp. 15 inch wheels can give a similar feel too(lesser degree). Suspension is the best for dropping 3-4 sec off any track course for reasonable money. Change all the rubber. Elephant racing or Wevo. Go Bilstein or Konis for dampers Up the torsion sizes. Sways Monoballs. Strut brace. Get a good raceshop to align it. Actually if you've gone this far, get the body on a jig to true it up while your at it. Very obsessive and expensive world you've entered! I'm being silly to some degree here, but equally not out of context as if you search this board you'll find there isn't anything I've listed that someone hasn't done :-) Oh actually the cheapest speed gain is driver ed. Simon Kinda depends on what extremes you will go to.
__________________
85' Carrera 3.2 02' Mazda MX5 |
||
![]() |
|
Original Owner
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,907
|
The 915 will handle 300HP as long as you own the car. The wannabes are stuck with 200 with their SC 3.0s ... after they put in their SSIs and and cams and free flows. An 86 3.2??? Pump it up....an easy 300.
Muhahahaha!
__________________
tsuter 78 911SC Turbo Targa Thaaaats Right!! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greater Metropolitan Nimrod, Oregun
Posts: 10,040
|
fanatical?
We're all just regular guys, reasonable people... moderates. You just have to decide what you can live without - and throw it away. The next step is to decide how many pennies you want ot spend on light wt. parts - e.g. my car has heavier brakes but I lightened the rear with a different trans., FG F&R bumpers, and FG engine lid, lightwt. starter, and some other items. But I kept the sunroof...
__________________
"A man with his priorities so far out of whack doesn't deserve such a fine automobile." - Ferris Bueller's Day Off |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 4,740
|
Quote:
Have to admit my obsession is performance too but with a corresponding increase in efficiency which can be a bit of a challenge without the backing of a Swiss acct. Last edited by stlrj; 10-22-2005 at 06:59 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
yup- TURBO, TURBO, TURBO. Ain't nothing like it.
__________________
"Igneous Aquam et Laudi semper" Carl Muckley |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Kerrville, Texas
Posts: 1,021
|
If you go with 964 grid cams go to John Dougherty in California. I did on this summers rebuild and was very happy with his service and the cams result. Engine just keeps piling on the power as it reaches redline. I should have time this week to get dyno results which I'll post. Cost was about $300 plus shipping and the not minor cost of the rebuild.
__________________
1987 911 Guards Red Targa, nearing 200,000 miles, lowered, 7's & 8's, 964 grind cams from John Dougherty, A.P.E. Mass Flow Sensor with chip to match, cat bypass, strut brace, dual out muffler. Will consider newer model in 8 years when I turn 75 and then maybe not. 2012 BMW 528i (wife's) 2007 Toyota FJ (rain and off road days) |
||
![]() |
|