Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   CIS to Carbs '74 - installation best practices (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/259992-cis-carbs-74-installation-best-practices.html)

Porsche_911s 01-09-2006 08:04 AM

CIS to Carbs '74 - installation best practices
 
Zenith 40's '74 2.7

EDIT => Updated thread with parts used

Zenith Jetting: Venturies 34, Main 145, Idle 55 ~ 60, AC 185, Anidles 130

Fuel lines: CIS fuel lines are fine if lines are in good condition. Older lines will have to have a line pushed over them and clamped with EFI clamps. '78 lines and newer have metric ends and either lines will have to be made or fittings converting to barb can be used. I went with Marine grade fuel line rated to 100 PSI. 5/16 line

Fuel regulator: Started with a Holley that had no return. I was unsure of the pressure with an inline gauge, switched to the PMO regulator with a return line that had a built in gauge. Felt more comfortable with this setup.

Fuel pump: Went with an Airtex fuel pump that puts out 5 to 9 lbs with a 30 GPM output. Easy to install and small enough to install in the front if the original fuel pump was located next to the fuel tank.

Fuel filter: Either use an inline filter before the regulator & one to each carb or something like a water/fuel separator. I live in Houston so I went with a "Cool Zone" water/fuel separator that filters down to 2 micron.

Ignition: I had problems getting the carbs tuned, went with a MSD 6AL and MSD high vibration coil. This solved fouling plugs while trying to get the carbs tuned. A properly tuned carb and CDI box will work fine.

Wires: Went with Nology wires because I got a good price on a used set. If I had to buy new I would have went with the Magnacore.

Plugs: NGK5ES, 6ES, 7ES gapped at .40 with MSD or .35 with CDI depending on engine setup

Distributor: Had mine re-curved by Barry in Detroit. Or a new RS distributor will do the trick. There is a MUCH better power band with the re-curved distributor. The vacuum retard can be unhooked or removed at the time of the recurve.

Exhaust: '74 exhaust and the muffler of your choice. I went with a Magnaflow dual in/dual out. Was a tad loud and ended up putting Pacesetter tips to tame it down a bit. I recommend putting bungs in both sides of your '74 exhaust if you take it to a muffler shop for the exhaust work. For "future" upgrades. I also went with 2 1/2" pipe and would go smaller if I had to do it over again.

Air intake: K&N filters with rainshields or original air box for carbs.

Breather (engine vent): Breather tank or original air box for carbs with breather port. I went with an Ovalcraft breather tank.

Power brakes: 3 to 4 manifold ports will have to be tapped to supply enough vacuum to power the brake booster. I have 3 and it seems to be enough and the engine does not suffer. Remember to install a check valve.

CAM: If you have carb P&Cs the sky is the limit for CAMs. If you have the CIS setup, you can upgrade to the SC CAMs (which will require SC CAM towers) or go with a regrind like the DC 10 grind (drcamshafts.com).

Tuning: Unless you are a pro, I'd recommend getting a Gunson gastester, LM-1, or LC-1. The gastester will help set the mixture at idle the LM-1 or LC-1 will take advantage of the bungs you had installed in your exhaust. They use a wideband O2 sensor to feed a laptop data. Other tools that are a MUST are Float Gauge by PMO, Synchrometer, timing light, and something for reading the idle at the back of the car.

Other items would be printer to print off all the suggestions you'll find on this board. Read and then re-read!!

I hope this helps someone!!

moneymanager 01-10-2006 04:30 PM

I replaced my CIS system with PMO's a year or so back. The CIS lines from the tank are just fine. PMO says set the fuel pressure should be around 3-4 lbs (they include a gauge which it sounds like you have as well). I ran mine at 5 lbs for a few days before finding it was too high so I doubt 4 lbs is too high.

ianc 01-10-2006 06:24 PM

[smartass]Best practice is to leave the excellent CIS alone and not install primitive carbs[/smartass]

Sounds like you're a little far along for that advice however.

ianc

Porsche_911s 01-10-2006 06:32 PM

Yes, a little far along for that advice. However, I am not selling or parting the CIS and will keep it nice and stored.

Moneymanager well come to the board!

Thanks for the reply

RoninLB 01-10-2006 07:52 PM

It's a Carb eat MFI world imo.

jwetering 01-10-2006 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by moneymanager
I replaced my CIS system with PMO's a year or so back. The CIS lines from the tank are just fine. PMO says set the fuel pressure should be around 3-4 lbs (they include a gauge which it sounds like you have as well). I ran mine at 5 lbs for a few days before finding it was too high so I doubt 4 lbs is too high.
Double that - CIS lines are fine. I too ran an unregulated fuel pump putting out about 5 psi for a while, but you know you'll always be wondering about those needle valves, and even the slightec=st hiccup will have you suspecting fuel pressure.

A really nice (and not at all expensive) setup is the PMO fuel bars and pressure control unit. It will cost you less than $200, but will give great fuel delivery. The PMO system has a gauge and uses the CIS return lines so your fuel keeps circulating. You can use the Holley pump and step the pressure down to whatever you want.

I have a couple of pictures here somewhere...although they're not great. Note that in these pictures the return line is connected to the input on the pressure control unit and the input line hadn't been connected yet. I was in the process of sorting it all out when I took the picture.

In case you were wondering....the red lines in the back are my power brake vacuum lines...tapped into my intake manifolds.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1136959305.jpg
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1136959357.jpg

Vipergrün 01-10-2006 09:09 PM

I was gonna recommend contacting PMO, but since Jasper already did....:)



Moneymanager, welcome to the boards, lots of fun around here. Please note that a formal introduction and pics of your car are required. I grew up in SB (well, Goleta), wonder if I know you?

Porsche_911S, good luck with your project, don't be discouraged. The carbs should wake your engine up. Has she been rebuilt?

Porsche_911s 01-11-2006 05:30 AM

Yeah, the engine was rebuilt. It was rebuilt for CIS and I will be changing the goodies a little later to take advantage of the carbs.

The setup looks great! I'll play around with it and see what happens.

Mike Bonkalski 01-11-2006 10:23 AM

You might want to take a look at your fuel supply setup. It looks like you have a loop setup, but no return. If your not running a return, shouldn't you just "dead-end" at the fuel rail ends??

jwetering 01-11-2006 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike Bonkalski
You might want to take a look at your fuel supply setup. It looks like you have a loop setup, but no return. If your not running a return, shouldn't you just "dead-end" at the fuel rail ends??
Yes - I know - look at my comments. The picture was taken before the installation was complete. There's a fuel filter on the input line now as well, makes three filters in total and one for each of the two carbs.

Hang on - just reread your post. It's not a true loop setup. Each carb is fed individually, but the two carbs are connected around the outside (if you know what I mean). Not really necessary, but it does gurantee fuel is available for all four floats in more or less equal measure. The PMO pressure control unit has two outputs. You can't really make a true loop using that product, and arguably you wouldn't want to anyway because the last float bowl in the chain could get starved.

Porsche_911s 01-11-2006 11:29 AM

Did your power brakes take two vacuum sources?

jwetering 01-11-2006 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Porsche_911s
Did your power brakes take two vacuum sources?
No - I drilled four of the 6 intake runners and tapped in
swagelock (compression) fittings. Then I used 1/4" brass tubing and more swagelock fittings to tie them all together into the existing power brake line to the booster. I can take closeups if'n you want. It actuallly looks and works really good (well).

Porsche_911s 01-11-2006 11:38 AM

Reason I asked is because I think only one of the runners I have were tapped for a vacuum source for power brakes (or other item needing vacuum).

jwetering 01-11-2006 11:44 AM

I spoke with Bruce Anderson at the time when I was doing it and he recomended four taps. He said 6 was too many and two were too few. Sure enough I can't tell the "new" power brake feel from the old.

Porsche_911s 01-11-2006 01:29 PM

Pics of the setup would be great.

Thanks,

Porsche_911s 01-12-2006 12:38 PM

What size fittings did you use? (for the regulator and fuel pump) Would you use 1/4 or 3/8?

RoninLB 01-12-2006 01:56 PM

big cams should need at least 2 lines for the booster. I'm doable with 1 line but 2 would be nice. 6 lines with 6 dash vac gauges would be too much. A digital bar graph with roating numetical in a

2.25" dash gauge would be trick.http://www.pelicanparts.com/support/smileys/fles.gif

randywebb 01-12-2006 03:48 PM

also check to make sure all the ports match

jwetering 01-12-2006 10:07 PM

I posted my power brake setup in a separate thread - so as not to hijack this carb thread. The link is here

link to power brake setup

I also snapped a couple more pictures of my PMO fuel regulator setup:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1137135951.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1137135905.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1137136016.jpg

RoninLB 01-13-2006 01:08 AM

I see what's happening now. You used 1/4 tube. The stock single PMO is one large fitting. Is your cam more radical than the MFI S-cam?

btw.. nice clean job.

jwetering 01-13-2006 05:09 AM

Yes - the cam is more radical than an S-cam. Only sometimes in traffic will the engine falter when I brake.

RoninLB 01-13-2006 05:52 AM

meaning the booster will affect your engine ?

Porsche_911s 01-13-2006 06:10 AM

Thanks for posting the pics. I'll check out the other thread about the brakes.

One question, did you use the metal fuel lines going through the car? If so, how did you connect to it? Do you remember the size fitting you had to use?

jwetering 01-13-2006 01:45 PM

ronin - I find that sucking the air out of the intake manifold by applying the brakes can affect my idle yes.

911s - no I used rubber fuel grade hoses in the engine compartment, with the hose clamps designed not to cut into the rubber. I also used the stock rubber line going into the tunnel. I think the line in the tunnel itself is metal...but don't quote me.

aircooledsonly 01-13-2006 04:58 PM

If you can get this set up to work please let me know, I inherieted an another MOTOR MEISTER project form hell. The car is undrivable. I will post the details regarding this nightmare shortly. Jay Moore, thanks The engine is a 2.7 cis with Zenith carbs. As delivered to my shop it has 135 mains, 195 airs, and 36mm venturis. AFR is 8 to 1 at part throttle.

randywebb 01-13-2006 05:23 PM

I wonder what would happen if all the shops in the western US posted a sign that said they would work on MorMeister cars only with a $500 surcharge for diagnosis and problem-shooting...

RoninLB 01-13-2006 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jwetering
ronin - I find that sucking the air out of the intake manifold by applying the brakes can affect my idle yes.
for entertainment I'd confirm that the booster check valve is still operational. The plastic valve is in-line.

jwetering 01-14-2006 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RoninLB
for entertainment I'd confirm that the booster check valve is still operational. The plastic valve is in-line.
hhmmm - I'll definitely look at that. Where's the valve located?

RoninLB 01-14-2006 01:42 PM

mine is in the engine compartment.

also confirm a good rubber grommet seal from the vac line into the booster.

Porsche_911s 01-15-2006 02:11 PM

Here is a pic, I got them installed and it runs. However, this is no way near the final install. I ran out of time today and had to do a quick and dirty install to move the car before it starts raining.

Here is another question I have, how do you vent the oil tank? (the large hose that went to the CIS air box)

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1137366685.jpg

aircooledsonly 01-16-2006 07:18 AM

If you can get the Zeniths to work on your 2.7 cis engine would you please let me know as that is what I'm dealing with and as is the engine is untunable.Thankyou Jay Moore. P.S. the problem may not be the carbs, it may be that it is a Motor Meister engine.

Porsche_911s 01-16-2006 02:30 PM

Am I over thinking this? Is it as simple as getting an after-market "mushroom" chrome breather that will attach to the hose?

RoninLB 01-16-2006 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Porsche_911s
Am I over thinking this? Is it as simple as getting an after-market "mushroom" chrome breather that will attach to the hose?


you're not over thinking. There have been a couple of good threads on this in the past year. There is a track consideration of a necessary catch can. Either yes or no. If no then is there ring blow-by. If no track requirement then a K&N mounted directly to the tank is doable. My install uses a 1ft hose leading foreward under the compartment shelf. Then of course there is the routine breather connection to the air cleaner cover.

Do a search as some pelicanheads have done some nice installs.

jwetering 01-16-2006 07:43 PM

I ran a simple K&N mushroom for a few years, but it made a he!! of a mess. There's a fair bit of blow-by mist when you spend a lot of time "0N" it.

I now run a hose forward, down under the parcel shelf, and then under the oil tank exiting where my rear valence would be if I had one. You can see the hose in the last of the three pics I posted. One day I'll fabricate some kind of catch can. I notice Bob Tilton has just started a thread on catch can designs. Catch it if you can (haha). :D

Porsche_911s 01-17-2006 07:48 AM

I'll get a breather tank and go from there.

Does anyone know what does conversion is for the -AN hose size to standard measurements? I.E. is -8AN ~ to 1/2?? I am trying to find some hose for the 1/2 nipple on the fuel tank to the fuel pump.

Thanks for all the replies!!

Porsche_911s 04-30-2006 07:35 PM

Well this is probably as good as it gets... I updated the first page to hopefully help others (or discourage them LOL) who are looking to do something similar.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1146454444.jpg [img]

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1146454462.jpg[/img]

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1146454489.jpg

RoninLB 04-30-2006 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by aircooledsonly
If you can get this set up to work please let me know, I inherieted an another MOTOR MEISTER project form hell. The car is undrivable. I will post the details regarding this nightmare shortly. Jay Moore, thanks The engine is a 2.7 cis with Zenith carbs. As delivered to my shop it has 135 mains, 195 airs, and 36mm venturis. AFR is 8 to 1 at part throttle.
I love carb stories.

What happened on this one?

RoninLB 04-30-2006 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Porsche_911s


Well this is probably as good as it gets...
looks great.

Do you have specs on the dizzy curve ?

Early_S_Man 04-30-2006 11:02 PM

Stephen,

Your plugs are too HOT, and your venturis are probably too large for a SC/DC-10 CIS-cammed 2.7 ...

You should be very, very careful of too much ignition advance with those hot plugs! BP6-ES would be a better starting point, maybe BP7-ES in hot weather.

What is the power peak rpm with the DC-10 cams? My best guess would be around 5900 rpm.

Porsche_911s 05-01-2006 05:52 AM

RoninLB- No specs on the dizzy, it's basically the RS dizzy so those specs should do. Thanks for all your past posts, I tried to copy most of what you did!!

Warren- I was fouling plugs like crazy so I went with the hotter plug. I updated my info on the first page to reflect your comment. I am inline for a gastester or may just break down and get the LC-1. Once I can fine tune my system I will lower the heat range on the plug. I know the 5ES was a hot one and I don't want to blow a hole in the piston!

CAMs & Venturies- I am not even going to touch this subject, I defer all questions to the experts. If you want a hotter CAM talk to the Camgrinder... Current venturies are suggested size for my current setup. Hopefully I will upgrade CAMs (perhaps Ps&Cs) next winter and will address venturies if needed.

I just wanted to pool info to one page to share my experience. And it's an on going one as I fine tune the system.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.