![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hong Kong -
Posts: 527
|
![]()
Difficult decision: Can experienced experts help
1992 964 C2 Very rare 1 of 60, im told Turbo body, brakes and suspension, Cabriolet, charcoal gray, grey leather(bit tatty), a/c, Cups with SO2s, 80k kms, Auto, Sport seats, Pounds 15,000 One Owner, specialist service all records ** This one I can get a trade in on my 94 840 BMW (value 7000 pounds) or 1989, 911 Carrera 3.2 Very low mileage 36k kms, grey, black leather (excellent) s with Yokayama's, recent new clutch Dec 2005, new a/c pump, Single owner specialist history, concourse condition, Pounds 15,000 VERY difficult decision. 1/ Which is a better car as far as long term reliability, maintainance costs 2/ Which will hold its value in the long term 3/ Which will be easier to sell on mid term 3-5 yrs 4/ Which would be a better 'investment' 5/ Which would YOU recommend I go for and why given the same price. Both are very very excellent condition especially the Carrera 3.2 which is EXCEPTIONAL PS I'm in Hong Kong __________________ Richard Hatter ![]() ![]()
__________________
Euro 1989 Carrera 3.2 Paint Code L 693 Stone Grey 45,000 kms logged |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: PA of USA
Posts: 747
|
A nice problem to have...
By coincidence (or intelligent design…) there is a very nice (down to earth) comparison of the two in Total 911 Magazine (February issue) –a must read for you BTW, if the only requirements / criteria are as stipulated the ’89 will be the “better” choice Good luck!
__________________
1995 993 ('Under my Care') 1989 911 ('Go Pitt') 1996 993 ('Go Navy') 1984 911 ('Go Pelican') Last edited by Jascha; 02-12-2006 at 04:46 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I prefer the 3.2...but I have one....I prefer the coupe....I prefer the condition...obviously the previous owner took somewhat better care of it due to condition....mechanicals are not mentioned so it is hard to tell...I like the wide body....but not in cab form.....that is just my personal preference....I am old school...You must factor into the price what it will take you to bring the wide body up to the condition of the 3.2
__________________
Don Booth 87 Carrera Coupe (Current) 70 911 T Coupe 74 914 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I'd take the C2 Cabriolet. Have always preferred the wide body!
__________________
'14 Cayenne Diesel |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hong Kong -
Posts: 527
|
Thanks for that...
Quote:
Interesting that noone mentions the manual vs auto transmission as a differentiator... Please keep the replies coming this is really helping me..howver the 3.2 seems to be out in front aesthetically the 964. mechanically the 3.2 has had a PPI and has an excellent scorecard/// not done the 964 yet but only 80k kms.. enjoying the replies thanks..
__________________
Euro 1989 Carrera 3.2 Paint Code L 693 Stone Grey 45,000 kms logged Last edited by Rad Hatter; 02-12-2006 at 05:01 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I missed that the 964 was auto. Take the carrera!
__________________
'14 Cayenne Diesel |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hong Kong -
Posts: 527
|
Why >?
What makes you change your mind Brian?
This is my first Porsche ...Im 47 and have been dreaming of one since my 20's I was led to believe from the dealer that this TURBO body 964 was very very rare especially RHD and thu more collectible...ie. was only made in that year 1992 and the suspension and upgraded brakes... I suppose being rare doesnt make it more sought after or valuable? ![]()
__________________
Euro 1989 Carrera 3.2 Paint Code L 693 Stone Grey 45,000 kms logged |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,950
|
Rare, 964, collectable, and "auto". Do not belong in any combination of sentences. I would'nt even look at an automatic Porsche, so that ends the comparison right there. If the transmissions were both standards, then the comparison could start.
|
||
![]() |
|
Irrationally exuberant
|
IMO, even the "rare" Porsches aren't good investments. An "investment" has to be something that makes money and I can't think of any P-cars that will outperform "normal" investments. I don't think these guys that bought the 959's and put them in bubbles have made more money than if they had invested their money in a savings account.
I think the trick to making money in "rare" Porsches is to convince a buyer that they will be worth more later on - and sell them for more than they are really worth today based on that. Don't buy a Porsche as anything but an investment in pleasure. Drive them both and see which one makes you smile more. IMO once you get past the initial "wow, I'm driving my dream car" stage, the 3.2 will give you more smiles per mile. -Chris
__________________
'80 911 Nogaro blue Phoenix! '07 BMW 328i 245K miles! http://members.rennlist.org/messinwith911s/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Rad Hatter,
I can contribute a little bit of perspective as a recent first-time 911 owner. I was looking for a reliable and affordable 911 after wanting one for over 30 years. My research led me to conclude the the late 80's models would be right for me. I ended up with a 89 3.2 with 80,000 miles (Stone Gray) in excellent condition, and it is every thing that I dreamed it would be. If the 89 you are looking at really is in exceptional condition, you should give it strong consideration. I can't comment on the investment potential beyond the fact that the last Bruce Anderson article in Excellence discussing market values had the 3.2s going up slightly in value. Good investment potential did not have much to do with my purchase decision beyond making the determination that I believed I could sell the car if needed and not take a financial bath.
__________________
1997 Carrera 993 coupe - Slate Grey Metallic / Classic Grey 1989 Carrera 3.2L coupe - departed - Stone Grey Metallic / Silk Grey |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Beach, Florida, USA
Posts: 7,713
|
"Rare" in Porsches doesn't always mean more valuable. There are many obvious examples of limited run cars, options, features and color combinations that are rare or unusual but really don't affect price.
It seems as though every Porsche around is advertised as rare for one reason or another. When you see one described as "rare", insert the word "unusual" for "rare" and see if the description still fits. If so, the car or feature is an interesting conversation point, and adds character and personality, but probably doesn't increase value. As for the two cars you are looking at, the heavy bias on this board is likely to be the 89. That's because it is a great car, the last of the original platform 911s, is a coupe, and has a manual - all features the enthusiasts on this board value. The 964 is a much more modern car in many ways. It will feel heavier, more cush, and will not be as much of a challenge to drive, especially with the automatic transmition. All of these things detract from it if you are looking at it as an enthusiast, but will make the car more desirable if you want a daily driver. The turbo body, brakes and suspension upgrades are very desirabe no matter what. I like cabs, I love the widebody look and don't mind autos in a daily driver. If that describes you and you want the more modern car, the 964 is a good choice. If you want a more visceral experience, a great track or road car, and one that you can do more work on yourself, the 3.2 sounds like the better choice. In the final analysis, I would let the condition of the car and the use you want to make of it be the determining factor. To me, the near perfect leather interior on the 3.2 would be a great selling point. But leather can often be restored remarkably, be fair in your evaluation. As they say, there is no wrong answer to this question.
__________________
MRM 1994 Carrera |
||
![]() |
|
durn for'ner
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of Sweden
Posts: 17,090
|
Presuming (after a PPI) they are both in a healthy condition, I would say the most important difference between the two being the fact that the 964 comes without a solid roof. Next auto or manual.
Apart from that the differences are not dramatic. So, you want wind in your hair or not ? Automatic gear or manual ?
__________________
Markus Resident Fluffer Carrera '85 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hong Kong -
Posts: 527
|
The Carrera 3.2 is it (longish)
Actually I have decided on the 1989 Carrera 3.2. Coupe
Ideally a Cab but there are NONE - well for sale here anyway that I'm aware of. Yep I had always been searching for a cabriolet Carrera but unfortunately it seems Hong Kong has been raped of its early Porsches. Expatriates - like myself who come here, find a low mileage P Car and export them back home when their contract is up - or to make a fast buck... ( its only a small Island) and most people use their sports cars weekends or even only for 40-50 miles on a Sunday !!) Expats also tend to be enthusiasts and will "over-service" their cars as one P Car specialist put it to me recently. Anyway I digress. So for me it's the 3.2 1989 Carrera Coupe ...and this one is a one-off. I really enjoyed the test drive of the Coupe and already have an 94' 840 BMW if I want an Auto. This P- Car is to have a bit of fun when the HK city goes to bed and I take her out for a spin at 11.30 pm at night or 5am...hehe. and get to know other early Porsche guys here in Hongkers.. like Bruve who posted earlier. The article in TOTAL 911 was great so thanks for the heads up. Made me even more determined I had made the right choice. After the 8 series I have been looking for a motorcar that was more involving and I have found it ....thanks . Many thanks and I look forward to being around here ![]() ![]()
__________________
Euro 1989 Carrera 3.2 Paint Code L 693 Stone Grey 45,000 kms logged Last edited by Rad Hatter; 02-13-2006 at 06:39 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 301
|
Good choice.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Richard
Is that Carrera a RHD model? If so, how much do they go for over there?
__________________
Chris - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1982 911 SC Hellblau Metalic - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1997 Boxster 986 2.5l |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Chris,
You can tell it's a RHD by a couple things. The position of the side view mirror and the windscreen wipers are also "reversed" compared to the US models. I can also see the hump on the dash where the gauges are located. Just my observation or guess! Regards,
__________________
John 1997 993 2012 991 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Congrats! That's a long raod trip back to the States.
![]()
__________________
Past: 04 Anniversary 911 #0895, 82 911 SC, 88 Signature Series Carrera, 88 911 Turbo Cab, 73 911T, 63 356B, 06 Cayenne |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minivan
Posts: 219
|
An aquaintance of mine makes a pretty good living "raping" Hong Kong of slightly used exotics and exporting them to LHD places like Britain and Australia. I'll let him know what you think of him.
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hong Kong -
Posts: 527
|
Quote:
But it's true, Hong kong has more Porsche, Rolls Royce & Ferraris per sq mile than anywhere in the world. ![]() Once again thanks chaps BTW yes its a RHD car...Im buying.
__________________
Euro 1989 Carrera 3.2 Paint Code L 693 Stone Grey 45,000 kms logged |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hong Kong -
Posts: 527
|
Thanks Bruce Morgan....
Hey Bruce
Thanks for calling me back today...very interesting chat from a P - Car expert in my jungle here Hong Kong. Brilliant feedback and I look forward to meeting you in person so we can hook up and you can show me some fun drives... Can't wait to pick up the car... ![]() ![]()
__________________
Euro 1989 Carrera 3.2 Paint Code L 693 Stone Grey 45,000 kms logged |
||
![]() |
|