![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Yorkshire UK
Posts: 1,097
|
Turbo Efficiency
Why do turbo'd cars do so much less MPG? are they naturally less efficient than there NA counterparts. Obviously they are more powerfull and have the ability to burn more fuel if driven fast but if driven at the same speed as a similar engine sized NA car shouldnt thay do about the same MPG.
Steve
__________________
1972 911t RS Styled G50 conversion underway 1972t Resto Project - http://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=16695 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 279
|
The biggest reason most turbo'd cars get less gas mileage is because of the foot pressing the accelerator. When you are not on the boost the car should for the most part consume about the same amount of fuel as an NA car. I had a VW GTi 1.8t. The car got about 32-34mpg at 75-80mph. Granted the newer turbo'd cars are much more efficient in terms of engine management and even higher compression for better combustion.
__________________
'94 VW Jetta '85 VW Scirocco '81 911 SC coupe Euro '67 VW Bug |
||
![]() |
|
Non Compos Mentis
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Off the grid- Almost
Posts: 10,591
|
I suppose low compression ratios may make the engine less efficient when off boost.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I agree, most of the reason the MPG is low is driver discipline, or lack there of. I own one and it beggs to be driving at low rates of efficiency. Outside of that, the low compression rate will adversly effect the engines relative ability to generate power. I try not to measure my driving experiences in dollars.
__________________
'77 930 turbo Garretson I/C 1 BAR spring, (2) '82 Triumph Bonneville Royal Wedding Edition Past rides: '74 914 1.9 liter twin plugged track car, '83 928S, '87 924S, '75 911S w '78 ROW 3.0, '72 911T, '70 911T and various other insignificant domestic examples. Happiness is a grey tailpipe! Turbo lag......it's worth the wait! |
||
![]() |
|