![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 5,857
|
Why does the steering feel so much heavier?
I recently traded my 73.5T for another CIS car, an 83SC...
Themost shocking thing is the weight of the steering on the SC compared to the T. Why is that ? Bear in mind: same situation all around, new shocks, new alignment, same steering wheel on both cars (a Momo race), practically the same tire size (195 vs 205) - so why does the SC feel so much heavier to steer ? Just curious ! I know the car itself is heavier but suspected the weight was mostly interior and engine, the nose part looks very similar in terms heavy stuff, could it be all it is ? Impact bumpers ? I though that on 2 cars w/o power steering, on similar tires, it should feel close ! The SC feels twice as heavy to steer ! Twice as solid too, mind you ! Engine wise, I really liked the 2.4 T with shorter gear ratios more in first and second gear - it was a rocket. But once in 3rd, the SC's torque is felt and the car feels more solid over 85 mph ! I think it's the gearing that did it, the Sc feels like it has a way longer 1st gear - maybe too long ! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 765
|
Strut tower brace and turbo tie rods will make a world of difference.
__________________
Bill 87 911 Targa 06 Toyota Sequoia |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 5,857
|
Got the TT-rods already, and it's lowered a bit, I should have said...
You are saying a strut brace will make the front end feel lighter ? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Caster setting has an effect on the "weight" of the steering. The less caster, the less steering "weight", IIRC. More caster gives you better stability at speed but resists steering inputs more. Less caster gives a lighter feel but less high speed stability. I'm not sure of the stock caster settings on the two cars but I suspect it might be less positive on the older car than the newer car.
And yes, tire size will have an effect, as will the weight of the front bumpers and any junk in the trunk, tank capacity, etc. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
wider wheels and tires, no?
__________________
John 2005 997 Carrera S -- Artic Silver/Sea Blue Former friends: 1989 930 factory Slantnose / 1998 C4S Coupe / 1973.5 911T / 1976 914 2.0 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,052
|
Greg, don't you have a car that is really two halves spliced together?
Could have something to do with it. I would bank on the combo of what has been said: wheel/tire set up alignment set up added weight in the front of the SC, even if most of the added weight is in the rear. -Chris
__________________
1987 Guards Red Targa (sold) 2006 Toyota Tundra DC 4x4, the "man-e-van" 1998 CR500 Well on the fringe...... |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: maine
Posts: 46
|
greg,
you have lost(sold) that lovin feelin early cars have it and sc's dont. cheers bob
__________________
1973.5 911t |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Back in B'ham, AL
Posts: 3,459
|
IMO caster, toe and wheel/tire combination... I re-aligned mine last week and came back "TOO LIGHT"; re-adjusted the caster and the feeling came back.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Both cars are basically 40-60 frt/rear. The SC is heavier, thus more weight in the front as well.
If you like the lightweight feeling, put more air in the front tires or put the SC on a diet. Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 765
|
Quote:
__________________
Bill 87 911 Targa 06 Toyota Sequoia |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
![]()
The 205/55ZR-16 tires have a wider tread and larger footprint than 195/65ZR-15 or 195/60VR-15 tires ... also, the scrub radius is longer, requiring higher steering effort with the same steerring wheel.
__________________
Warren Hall, Jr. 1973 911S Targa ... 'Annie' 1968 340S Barracuda ... 'Rolling Thunder' |
||
![]() |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,333
|
There are lots of unknown in the equation, from tires to alignment settings to the condition of the steering racks.
__________________
Jack Olsen 1972 911 My new video about my garage. • A video from German TV about my 911 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,668
|
Tire size, tire pressure, wheel offset, caster, camber, and vehicle weight - all affect steering "weight".
__________________
Chuck Moreland - elephantracing.com - vonnen.com |
||
![]() |
|
Designer King
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 5,499
|
Were both cars set up the same WRT front/rear ride heights? If not, the car w/ a lower front ht relative to rear will have more weight distributed to the front, which will create heavier steering.
__________________
Paul Yellow 77 Sunroof Coupe/cork interior; 3.2L SS '80 engine/10.3:1/No O2; Carrera Tensioners; 11 Blade Fan; Turbo tie rods; Bilstein B6; 28 tube Cooler; SSI, Dansk; MSD/Blaster; 16x7" Fuchs/205/50 Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s; PCA/UCR, MID9 Never leave well enough alone |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Black Rock, CT
Posts: 4,345
|
911s have the most sensitive steering in the world, nearly. Anything becomes magnified, Chuck hit the big ones. 1 degree more caster can make a big difference in feel. And air pressure is huge too.
__________________
Jake Gulick, Black Rock, CT. '73 yellow 911E , & 2003 BMW M3 Cab. Ex: 84 Mazda RX-7 SCCA racer. did ok with it, set some records, won some races, but it wore out, LOL[/B] |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Olympic Peninsula
Posts: 348
|
I have a similar difference between my '73 911T and '87 930. The Turbo's steering is much heavier. This in spite of the fact that the '73 has Turbo flares and is running 245's on the front vs. 205's on the 930.
Part of the difference in steering effort is probably weight (2900 for the 930 vs. 2400 lbs for the 911), but it is also true that, per the Porsche spec book, the '73's caster is 5.5 deg. vs. 6.5 for the Turbo. Caster is also 6.5 for the SC, so my guess is that more caster is the real difference. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I noticed the same thing after my alignment guru re-aligned my car last year after I'd rebuilt the suspension. I think he pulled the caster back to at least 6.5 degrees and the steering became noticably heavier than it had been before (which previously had the lightest steering of all the Carreras I'd driven).
Caster seems to be the main culpit here. Last edited by 450knotOffice; 08-01-2006 at 03:25 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Regenerated User
|
I have to agree on the setup. I bought my 72 after driving a very heavy steering SC. I thought this is just how they were, until a few weeks ago when I got to drive a friends 82 and BoxsterS. That 82 was really sweet. I never thought a 915 could shift that crisp and the steering felt just right.
__________________
My uncle has a country place, that no one knows about. He said it used to be a farm, before the motor law. '72 911T 2,2S motor '76 BMW 2002 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Black Rock, CT
Posts: 4,345
|
Honestly, I find caster to be (within a reasonable range) a matter of personal taste. I think that if you like light steering, go for a bit less. Or if more force as you turn is your thing, then add some caster.
In racing, i like a bit more caster, so that I can feel the forces load, and more importantly, unload through the wheel. It helps me get a better idea of whats going on at the interface point of road and rubber.
__________________
Jake Gulick, Black Rock, CT. '73 yellow 911E , & 2003 BMW M3 Cab. Ex: 84 Mazda RX-7 SCCA racer. did ok with it, set some records, won some races, but it wore out, LOL[/B] |
||
![]() |
|