![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
|
You can do a low boost, 360HP turbo upgrade, for ~$2k if you're good at shopping for 2nd hand parts
![]()
__________________
Merv '89 911 Turbo Cab Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 7,286
|
exhaust = 20HP
air Intake filter = 20HP cat = what? 40 HP? come on guys.
__________________
Fat butt 911, 1987 |
||
![]() |
|
?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 30,493
|
With all due respect to the previous posters (except for the suggestion to 'lose weight' and driving experience), imo they've missed the obvious. I suggest that you focus on the suspension. I've done a bunch over the past few years (SW chip, Fabspeed premuffler, sport exhaust, dropped a couple of hundred pounds, TOTAL suspension refresh/upgrade, 930 brakes, etc.), and by far the biggest performance gains were in the suspension area and improving the handling. The suspension upgrades will transform your car into a different animal, while the the modest hp gains will not. Lighten your car by 200 lbs (for free), and you'll be way ahead in the performance gains. Your suspension is approaching 20 years old...it's tired
![]() ps: Welcome to the board! edited: pps: I just read the previous posts a bit closer, and see that others have indeed suggested suspension... I concur! Last edited by KFC911; 08-17-2006 at 03:39 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
stage 1
7 or 8 x16 or 17 w/ 225min tires 8 or 9 x16 or17 w/ 245min tires Stage 2 adjustable sways f/r your choice Stage 3 up grade t bars & bushings your choice stage 4 930 or 993 brakes stage 5 open up the motor, you need cams, port mods, chip mods, rod bolt upgrade, exhaust
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 30,493
|
If your car still has the original Boge shocks (as mine did), that's the very first place I'd start...
|
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
I think it's pretty common for people to look at the exhaust as the first mod - coming from a 964 I thought the stock carrera 3.2 exhaust sounded more like a toyota than a sports car. Since that time I have worked my way through just about every component.
Also interesting - I was looking at a "used sports car market magazine" in barnes and noble the other day. One thing it specifically mentioned was that the shocks on the 3.2 carreras are good for 200,000 miles, one of the things that made the 3.2 a "good used sports car buy" in their eyes... It made me chuckle. and by this post, I am not advocating muffler over suspension, I just think it's pretty common to look at those items first, when in all actuality, following Bill V's steps will probably get you the highest "performance" gain.
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Moderator
|
Forgot the Bilstein's in step1
![]()
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
If it flows, it goes. If its smooth, it moves. Any questions? 96 993 C2 (Current) 87 911 Factory Turbo-Look Cab (Sold) 85 911 Factory Turbo-Look Targa (Gone) |
||
![]() |
|
THE IRONMAN
|
i will go for euro pre-muff...M&K exhaust...and a SW chips.
__________________
1984 911 CARRERA RUBY RED TARGA SW CHIPPED-BURSCH CATBYPASS MONTY FREE FLOW EXHAUST <IN GAS WE TRUST> |
||
![]() |
|
Back in New England!
|
Buy the chip after the upgrades to the engine, exhaust and intake. That way you know you like the mods and then buy the correct chip for the final set-up of your car
![]()
__________________
'78 RoW 911SC Targa converted to a '86-like 3.2L Cab (w/930 body & No A/C) Custom subframe integrated into AutoPower Half Cage, Euro Ride Height, Turbo Tie-Rods, WeltMeister Bump Steer Kit, Sway-Away 26mm Rear Torsion Bars, Koni Adjustable Shocks and Strut Inserts, Two Bar Rennline Strut Tower Brace, Poly Motor Mounts, WEVO Trans Mounts, Modified Conical K&N Intake, ER PB A-arm bushings and 17" CUP3 Wheels. Steve Wong Chip! |
||
![]() |
|
Turgid Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 425
|
SuperClyde,
Without hijacking this thread I will simply say that you should go back and re-read my original post. I was responding to SKM911's question about the stated performance gains in the Performance Parts catalog as they apply to air intakes. Some of the ads claim to add over 20 horsepower just by bolting on their air cleaner. This is clearly BS and has been proven so. In regards to exhausts, I would make the same claim if a manufacturer stated that by bolting on their muffler you would gain 50+ horsepower. But the fact still remains that some gains CAN be had by swapping mufflers, cat bypasses, etc. Is it 50+ horsepower? No way. Your bone of contention seems to be why there are any performance gains to be had at all. You seem to believe that the exhaust restrictions were built into the motors on purpose. Do you really think that a bunch of engineers sat around and said, "OK, lets use the more restrictive exhaust on these 3.2's so that guys can bolt on new exhausts to get more power"? We are going back roughly 20 years now, but the available technology and design parameters at that time led to the design of the exhausts as we now know them. In 20 years will someone find a way to get more power out of a 997 by messing with the exhaust? Probably. Does this mean Porsche knowingly built in a horsepower deficiency? Probably not.
__________________
'87 Carrera "Man who go through airport turnstile sideways going to Bangkok" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Encinitas (San Diego CA)
Posts: 4,495
|
I think the combination of intake, exhaust (SSI's), muffler and chip was good for about 15HP to 20HP, total on my old 3.2. The part throttle response increase from the SW chip is instantly noticeable. The smoother idle is instantly obvious, as well.
Doug
__________________
1971 RSR - interpretation |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Noney-
My "Bone" of contention is the thought that Porsche wouldn't obviously leave HPs on the table and not as you indicate in your previous post "why are performance gains to be had at all". The manufacturing process often causes engineering and design decisions to be made which will cause power and performance to suffer- this results from the need to mass produce products . Your rhetorical questions is absurd to say the least as we know that engineers aren't trying to diminish HPs but are required to maximize the HPs given a variety of parameters , including manufacturing limitations which you seem to conveniently ignore. As for how you even processed my previous postings and concluded that I was implying that engineers are trying to minimize power is beyond me (a non-sequitur and a red herring to say the least, try a different approach)- but If you like, I have an extra bolt laying around for the loose screw to enhance your intellectual exhaust output if you like...
__________________
Superclyde My Toy: 1988 911 Carrera Venetian Blue : SW Chip : Dansk 100 Cell "High-Flow" Cat : M&K 1 in 1 out : Fuchs 7x9x16 : Strut Tower Brace : Momo Modena My "Daily Driver": 2004 Nissan Pathfinder - the dog hauler My first car: 1979 MGB |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,638
|
Quote from Redlineshftr:
Quote:
My 87 Carrera has 165,000 miles and I have decided to "keep it forever". My car is far from perfect and the interior was getting a little worn, so... off came 400lbs, on went 9" Fuchs for the rear and 7" Fuchs to the front, Bilstein Sports, a suspension refresh, lowering, cornerbalance and Voila--a new car! It is WAAAAAY more fun and exciting to drive now than it was during the first 3 years. Before mods: ![]() After Mods: ![]() There are a couple more changes coming too. Mike Last edited by MOMO3.2; 08-17-2006 at 11:00 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Turgid Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 425
|
Settle down there, SuperClyde.
I've read all of your posts again and I'm still not exactly sure I'm following your argument as to why various systems on p-cars can and cannot be improved upon. We seem to have similar parts to our arguments...
__________________
'87 Carrera "Man who go through airport turnstile sideways going to Bangkok" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Lets go out for a beer... or a race in the canyons. The funny thing is I have an exhaust, SW chip and a stock air filter...
__________________
Superclyde My Toy: 1988 911 Carrera Venetian Blue : SW Chip : Dansk 100 Cell "High-Flow" Cat : M&K 1 in 1 out : Fuchs 7x9x16 : Strut Tower Brace : Momo Modena My "Daily Driver": 2004 Nissan Pathfinder - the dog hauler My first car: 1979 MGB |
||
![]() |
|
Turgid Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 425
|
![]() I'm on my way.
__________________
'87 Carrera "Man who go through airport turnstile sideways going to Bangkok" |
||
![]() |
|
Southern Class & Sass
|
Screw "upgrading" the car...
Sign up for a handfull of track days. You'll learn the biggest nut you can adjust is the one behind the wheel. And here's the kicker. When you move on to another car, you retain full value of the upgrade! ![]()
__________________
Dixie Bradenton, FL 2013 Camaro ZL1 Last edited by Dixie; 08-17-2006 at 01:50 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 9,859
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The fun - '06 Carrera, '79 930, '06 S4 Avant, '16 i8 The mundane - '24 Tesla Model 3, '22 Tesla Model Y, '19 Tacoma |
||
![]() |
|
Southern Class & Sass
|
Quote:
__________________
Dixie Bradenton, FL 2013 Camaro ZL1 |
||
![]() |
|