![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 17
|
![]()
I have a 69 912 that has been extensively being upgraded to a 3.0 liter turbo. It has 911 SC brakes. Can i put Carrera discs and calipers on without to much of a modification.
|
||
![]() |
|
Back in New England!
|
That is the current set-up of my 911 from the SC to the Carrera brakes.
If you currently have M and A calipers and rotors, then its a simple bolt on replacement with the wide A and wide M calipers and rotors. If you do not currently have the vacuum assist module with the SC/Carrera master cylinder then you will need to purchase that as well and plum a vacuum line for the vacuum assist module. If you do have the proper M/C and vacuum assist module than this will be a vary straight forward upgrade. The only thing that is difficult is installing the brake ware sensor system into the dash and running the lines to each caliper. This will also include the mount hardware under the car for the wear sensors to the umbilicals. My brake wear system is not operating because I do not have the umbilicals that go from the wear sensors (which I have also removed sense they were useless) to the dash mounted unit. This is no reason not to do the upgrade, it just means that you will have to take a look at your pads every so often, which you probably already do anyway. I say go for it, Matt
__________________
'78 RoW 911SC Targa converted to a '86-like 3.2L Cab (w/930 body & No A/C) Custom subframe integrated into AutoPower Half Cage, Euro Ride Height, Turbo Tie-Rods, WeltMeister Bump Steer Kit, Sway-Away 26mm Rear Torsion Bars, Koni Adjustable Shocks and Strut Inserts, Two Bar Rennline Strut Tower Brace, Poly Motor Mounts, WEVO Trans Mounts, Modified Conical K&N Intake, ER PB A-arm bushings and 17" CUP3 Wheels. Steve Wong Chip! |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Re: Replace SC brakes with Carrera Brakes
Quote:
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Back in New England!
|
Bill's method is also much cheaper as well.
__________________
'78 RoW 911SC Targa converted to a '86-like 3.2L Cab (w/930 body & No A/C) Custom subframe integrated into AutoPower Half Cage, Euro Ride Height, Turbo Tie-Rods, WeltMeister Bump Steer Kit, Sway-Away 26mm Rear Torsion Bars, Koni Adjustable Shocks and Strut Inserts, Two Bar Rennline Strut Tower Brace, Poly Motor Mounts, WEVO Trans Mounts, Modified Conical K&N Intake, ER PB A-arm bushings and 17" CUP3 Wheels. Steve Wong Chip! |
||
![]() |
|
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
Recall that the only benefit for your application is thicker front Carrera rotors vs. the 911SC. Same pads.
And if you aren't tracking the car, why bother with the change?
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 433
|
I do not totally agree with Bill.
Depending on if you are using bigger rear wheels you can actually use some more clamping power at the back and because of that you can use the Carrera calipers at he back as well. The Carrera brakes uses larger pistons in the rear calipers AND a pressure limiting valve to prevent locking the rears wheels. If you are using bigger wheels and has the heavier engine I suggest using Carrera brakes front and rear.
__________________
You might not be happier owning a Porsche, but it certainly feels so driving one |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Light,Nimble,Uncivilized
|
Excellent to hear validation to my plans. I'm installing a set of Carrera brakes on my '69T soon. I was planning on swapping both front and rear brakes but now I'll only do the fronts as I'm not installing larger wheels to get the power from the punny little 2.0L to the ground (yet). The car will eventually see track time on a regular basis.
__________________
Drago '69 Coupe R #464 |
||
![]() |
|
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
Then make certain you don't install the splash guards for track use - and install a cooling kit for the fronts.
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,346
|
I have Carrera brakes front and rear on my car with no proportioning valve. I wouldn't have done it that way but the car was that way when I bought it. I've raced the car that way for 5 seasons now. While I don't brake quite as deep as some of the others in my race group I don't feel like the balance is too bad. I don't lock up the rears and if I turn slightly when braking I'll lock up a front first due to the unloading of one front wheel.
For street use I'd say this set up is no problem. The best solution would be to install with a PV or a brake bias valve. -Andy
__________________
72 Carrera RS replica, Spec 911 racer |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,612
|
There are some new brake pads out that I hear are really good, called BHP. I haven't tried them yet, but personally I'd go that route first, then try cooling second.
The switch to new brakes is like buying a new knife instead of sharpening the old one. I think a logical starting point is to ask, what are you trying to accomplish? More fade resistance, or more initial bite? If your problem is fade, and not initial bite, then I'd try switching just the front to Carrera brakes before jumping in and changing all 4 at the same time. The reason is that the Carrera had a lot more ft/rr weight bias than the earlier cars. The principal benefit that I could see offhand would be the (much) thicker rotors. The drawback would be the thicker rotors weigh a lot more too. The reason for thicker rotors I think would be to offer a better heat sink for dissipation of braking energy. You could just bolt on the Brembo rotors for the Big Reds, which I think are a bolt in replacement on the Carrera brakes. The main benefits of the Brembos are that they are made from a higher quality metal than the Zimmermans, and of course they are drilled. The drawback of the Brembo rotors is that you lose some brake pad area unless you switch to bigger calipers (more initial bite), but now we are not talking about Carrera brakes anymore. So, I'd stick with your SC setup as long as you can, just upgrade the pads and put some cooling scoops on there. Last edited by rusnak; 03-27-2007 at 01:17 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
He needs appropriate track pads and cooling is a must -- IF he takes it to the track.
As of now, he has not replied to the affirmative. Not too certain about the rest of your advice, Rus.
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,612
|
Craig, I'm not the one saying BHP pads are track only, that is your insinuation, although you didn't go out and say so. As far as cooling goes, you're also advising him to add cooling and delete splash guards.
The guy is planning to upgrade his brakes, and he says he might track it later. I don't know what you're arguing about here.... |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
I didn't make an insinuation. I merely said:
1) ady930 did not say he was going to use the car at the track 2) If he is, to use pads that are appropriate. I prefer to use pads that are absolutely proven to take the extreme punishment the small pad size/relatively small disc mass/large heat saturation will deliver to the fluid and pads. It is no fun to have these small brakes fail on a car that easily sees 120 mph + on every track day. BTDT myself on the SC, and have heard too many tales of terror - being in the Porsche brake biz for 4 years. Cooling for tracked Carrera brakes is absolutely paramount, SC even more so. ady930, you out there to clarify your intended use?
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,612
|
OK Craig, I agree with you on the need for proven track pads for track use, I even agree with you on the need for increased cooling. I'd even agree with you if the car was going to be used on the track, if you had said the need for heat dissipation means he should use thicker rotors.
Carrera rotors are quite a bit thicker and heavier than SC rotors. I have an SC and a 3.2 and for some reason the SC stops a lot faster. I think it's because the SC weighs less than the 3.2. In my opinion the SC brakes are plenty strong to stop an early 911. The issue is fade due to heat, which is where the cooling issue comes in. I don't think street use on an early 911 is the right application for Carrera rotors, which come with a significant weight penalty. If it were a track car it might make sense to use 3.2 front calipers and Brembo rotors, but again you'd lose some brake pad surface area. There are companies out there that sell 930 turbo brake conversions that use the Brembo rotors. |
||
![]() |
|
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
It just isn't that significant of wieght difference - really, no one will ever be able to tell the difference.
How do you lose pad surface area with the exact same caliper on this Brembo rotor? Seems to me.....the pad is the same. And until ady930 responds, this is all bantering conjecture on both our parts.
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15,612
|
True Craig,
We are just bantering here. The drilled rotors have less contact area than stock solid vented ones. One can argue that the drilled rotors apply more braking efficiency due to gas venting, as in the first tests on the 917 drilled rotors. |
||
![]() |
|