Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   DME Chip Problem (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/338800-dme-chip-problem.html)

Lorenfb 04-04-2007 03:14 PM

"I would recommend he first swap the speed sensor (aka rpm sensor) and the reference sensor (same part) to see if the speed sensor is actually working. If you get a no start, then the possible problem is that the swapped sensor is bad."

Actually, if either sensor is bad, whether swapping or not, the engine won't
start.

A very simple method for checking the speed sensor is to remove the reference
sensor once the engine starts:

1. If the engine dies, the speed sensor is bad or positioned incorrectly.
2. If the engine runs poorly at idle or under load, then the speed
sensor is most likely bad or positioned improperly.
3. If test 1 or 2 is positive, then the sensors should be reversed
and positioned properly or a new speed sensor used.
4. If the engine runs O.K. under all loads and RPMs, then the
reference sensor is bad. Plug the reference sensor in to verify the problem.
5. If tests 1-3 are O.K. and the engine still runs poorly, then the problem
is not sensor related.

buttjoint 04-04-2007 04:25 PM

I think it's rather obvious who knows their sheite. Who offers one of the best performance upgrade on this site ?????

Lorenfb 04-04-2007 05:43 PM

"I think it's rather obvious who knows their sheite."

Really! Tried reading the thread and seeing the obvious lack of credibility,
or maybe another one where it's "over-his-head". But then again, "sheite"
is an appropriate description and to the point.

Steve W 04-04-2007 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lorenfb
"

Really! Tried reading the thread and seeing the obvious lack of credibility,
or maybe another one where it's "over-his-head".

Credibility? What exactly was point of going from 24 to 28 pin? I didn't hear your answer. Oh that's right, because you have absolutely . . . no idea!! It's so obvious you no clue as what really is going on, that if you did, you'd realize what an ass clown you made of yourself. Better go back to your desk and sit down.

Lorenfb 04-04-2007 09:43 PM

"I didn't hear your answer."

Like others who failed to fully read the thread. It's all there!
The facts are there to inform the website readers, as there's no financial
gain here as there is for some, i.e. no product is being hyped as is the
other situation.

"It's so obvious you no clue as what really is going on, that if you did, you'd realize what an ass clown you made of yourself."

A typical response from many, attack the messenger when the facts are
against you. What some will do to promote a basically valueless product.

Bottom line: The previously posted misinformation which was refuted tells
it all. Need more be said to further expose the lack of credibility.

Steve W 04-04-2007 09:48 PM

What "facts" are those again? There are a lot of errors in your posts, so spell it out what you are talking about. If you don't know, just admit it instead of dodging the question.

Wavey 04-05-2007 04:47 AM

Loren, you have this so totally upside-down, inside-out and backwards, it’s hard to know where to start.

1. “without the problematic issues of a performance chip.”

Will you please explain exactly what is problematic with Steve Wong’s performance chips? In previous posts, you have implied that Steve uses excessive advance, and that engine damage is imminent. But you do not provide any evidence of either actually being the case. Is there some other problem? Please provide evidence of real world problems. If you can provide evidence, my offer of $100 to your favorite charity still stands. Otherwise, please stop misleading people.


2. “Tried reading the thread and seeing the obvious lack of credibility”

Good luck getting a reply from you to a direct question! You only make statements, true or not, that support your position, and you ignore any questions that bring your own credibility into question. For example, you have never answered the question regarding whether or not you have sold, or attempted to sell, or are selling your own chips. That’s a direct question to you, right now. True or false?


3. “A typical response from many, attack the messenger when the facts are against you.”

What the #@*%? THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU DO! Whenever these threads come up, you start with what appears to be a helpful comment, but as soon as anyone disagrees, the real Loren comes out. You start with personal attacks, then you stalk the victim to other threads and to other boards, searching for other posts where you can inflict your ridicule. You even send nasty, threatening e-mails using the Pelican e-mail link. I can not believe that the moderators let you continue.


4. “What some will do to promote a basically valueless product.”

Please explain how hundreds of owners can be totally wrong about their own positive experience with Steve’s chips. Direct question, here and now. Your answer?

Wavey 04-10-2007 03:11 PM

Golly Gee, 5+ days and no answers from Loren. What a surprise:rolleyes:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.