Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sechelt B.C Canada
Posts: 199
Garage
Should ride height be lower.

My 75 911s is a little higher in the front end versus the back end.I took measurements from the ground through the centre point of the wheel to tne bottom of wheel well.I got 26 inches front and 23.75 inches back.Should I lower the front end to match the back.I have the bump steer kit already installed.The car had the spare in the trunk and around a half tank of fuel during the measurement.I have 15 inch fuchs with 205/55/vr15 tires.could the binding I have with the front suspension be minimized with ride height being the same all the way around.I have poly graphite bushings installed and they do squeak and bind especially when the weather is hot.

Old 08-19-2007, 05:13 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Somatic Negative Optimist
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winlaw, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,206
Garage
People generally aim for 25" front/24.5" rear.
In your case, I would come down about 11/2" inch in front to 24.5"
Coming down in front is easy: ~1/4" for every full turn.
Oil the adjuster screws.
If they bottom out before you get the desired height, you'll need to re-index the Torsion bars, not hard to do.
After you get the height, an alignment is necessary.
Decide on what camber/Toe you want in front.
Ignore the factory alignment, a 1/2 to 3/4 deg. negative camber in front is nice with a full degree neg camber in the rear.
Toe-in for the front 1/16" total and 0 in the rear is fine.
__________________
1980 Carrerarized SC with SS 3.2, LSD & Extras. SOLD!
1995 seafoam-green 993 C2, LSD, Sport seats.
Abstract Darwin Ipso Facto: "Life is evolutionary random and has no meaning as evidenced by 7 Billion paranoid talking monkeys with super-inflated egos and matching vanity worshipping illusionary Gods and Saviors ".
Old 08-19-2007, 06:06 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Bye, Bye.
 
Scooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 6,167
I would take the front down to a respectable level, then re-evaluate.

Gunter is right about the measurements above, but you must consider two additional factors...these measurements are at the wheel arches, but every car has different wheel arch measurements from the factory (handbuilding is not very precise sometimes), so this measurement is merely a loose guideline; second, you have different sized tires than SC's and Carrera's, which normally use these dimensions as a guide, therefore your numbers will likely be a little different.

Bottom line, take the front down to 24.5 to 24.25 or so and see it you think it is too low. The front is easy to adjust. If too low, then a little more work is involved with the back.

Good luck.
__________________
Elvis has left the building.
Old 08-19-2007, 07:38 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 4,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent Lineker View Post
My 75 911s is a little higher in the front end versus the back end.I took measurements from the ground through the centre point of the wheel to tne bottom of wheel well.I got 26 inches front and 23.75 inches back.

It's an illusion since the front wheel arches are cut 2 1/2" higher than the rear. Your rocker panels are level and that's what determines if the front is higher, not the wheel arches (factory measurements are never taken from wheel arches).
Old 08-19-2007, 09:54 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 10,550
The front arches are cut more like 1/2" higher ( not 2 1/2" higher)...therefore the common reference to 25.5" front and 25" rear.

A 205/55-16 tire ( or a 225/50-16 as used in the rear for SC's and Carrera's) has a rolling diameter of about 24.9 ". A 205/55-15 tire would have a rolling diameter of 23.9"...so the radius would be 1/2" lower, therefore the car would sit 1/2" lower. Your equivalent target would then be 25" front and 24.5" rear.

With he numbers you quote on your car, my first try would be to bring the front down about 1", and simply drive the car to check to how it feels. You'll likely end up with slightly more negative camber than spec ( not a bad thing altogether) but you may get a bit more toe-out than you desire. Unless you had too much toe-in to begin with. Try it first.

Hint: I would jack the front of the car to unload the adjusters. Why put them through more load-distress while adjusting? A 1/4" drop per revolution ( counterclockwise looking up while on your back) will lower the car ride height. Remember where you started so you can get back if you wish.
__________________
Wil Ferch
85 Carrera ( gone, but not forgotten )
Old 08-19-2007, 11:13 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 31,744
I have a 75 S as well. This is what it will look like lowered. I just measured and it is 23 3/4 in the rear and 24 1/4 in the front. I am thinking about bringing the front down a little one of these days.I am on 16s though so your measurements should be slightly different.
Old 08-19-2007, 12:40 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
safe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,148
Garage
Lower the front so you have a slight rake forward of about 1 degree, measured on the rockers.
__________________
Magnus
911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI.
911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day.
924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar.
931 -79 under total restoration.
Old 08-19-2007, 01:45 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Regis turd ab user
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tacomatose, Wa USA
Posts: 1,489
Brent; The idea of 1/2" higher in front is a rough ball park figure, and check the rear as you lower the front, it will change also, each corner affects opposite corner. If you like how your car "appears" at those numbers, then you will want (need) to do a corner balance and proper 4 wheel alingment. The numbers you have going into the shop should change slightly when you do the corner balance, and it it more important to try to get equal weight on each front wheel than it is to match the car side to side, you will really feel the difference in the cars handling.
Old 08-19-2007, 02:03 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Bye, Bye.
 
Scooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 6,167
Interesting numbers dipso.
__________________
Elvis has left the building.
Old 08-19-2007, 03:35 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sechelt B.C Canada
Posts: 199
Garage
Thanks all.I need to put the car up the next couple of weeks to put some new heat exchanger hoses and cables on.I will bring the front end down an inch at that time.

Old 08-19-2007, 05:14 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.