![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Point Roberts, WA and Vancouver BC
Posts: 535
|
Is there a real advantage to an older car?
I am considering a 69-73 911. I would upgrade to motor/transmission to a 3.0 or possibly 3.2 (No, I am not considering buggering up an original car!) Is there any advantage in a 69-73 chassis over my present 82 SC? Or is it just a matter of taste?
I have been tempted you see.....
__________________
Too many cars, not enough moolah... |
||
![]() |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dana Point, Ca
Posts: 55,591
|
I just got tired of working on older cars and bought a very nice 44k mile 89 targa, a little over two years ago. I have put 25 k miles on it, one set of rear tires, brakes, a new alternator. Oil changes. None of the things I had to fix surprised me for a car with 45-50k miles-when I did the repairs. I love it, drive it, no working on it.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,673
|
Disadvantage: Rust. No galvanizing on a '69.
Advantage: Probably 400 lbs lighter. More tossable. If you do the '69, PLEASE do not bastardize the car; they are more and more scarce. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico
Posts: 1,325
|
One distinct advantage of an older car is smog regulations.
Can't speak for Beautiful BC, but in many US states older cars are exempt from smog testing and some of the BS that goes with it.
__________________
DOUG '76 911S 2.7, webers, solex cams, JE pistons, '74 exhaust, 23 & 28 torsion bars, 930 calipers & rotors, Hoosiers on 8's & 9's. '85 911 Carrera, stock, just painted, Orient Red |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Point Roberts, WA and Vancouver BC
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Too many cars, not enough moolah... |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
My friend who knows about these things (Amelia Island and Rennsport concours winner) says NEVER get a car that isn't galvanized. The old ones ALL rust, even if you just wash it and put it in the garage. The only exception is for those people who can afford to flip or restore their early car every few years.
__________________
'88 Carrera Coupe G.P. White |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Why not have the best of both worlds, start with the later galvanized chassis, strip everything non-essential out of it and backdate it!
__________________
Michael Sans Porsche...for now 2009 Mazdaspeed 3 Grand Touring daily driver / DS autocross toy 2010 Subaru Forester X Limited - wife's daily driver |
||
![]() |
|
RETIRED
|
Do it.....to the SC. Backdate the panels if you prefer the longhood look.
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Washing a car and putting it straight in the garage is one of the worst things you can do if you are concerned about rust.......
__________________
'73 914 2.0, '74 911 Coupe, '74 911 Targa '78 924, '84 944, '86 944 Turbo, '84 911 Coupe '84 944 (current), '96 993 Coupe (current) '73 911T Coupe (current) '88 930S M505 (current) |
||
![]() |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lacey, WA. USA
Posts: 25,310
|
There is little difference in the weight of the shells. The weight difference comes from the difference in parts bolted onto the shell. If the VIN plate is not important to you, then the ticket would be a late, galvanized shell with the parts of your choosing bolted on.
But I will say this: There is no substitute for low weight, and there is no more responsive throttle/fuel system than MFI. Because of this, a '73 RS is WAY more fun to drive than an SC or Carrera. For me, Porsches are not about luxury. They are about performance and fun and responsiveness and reliability. The perfect car would be a galvanized shell with longhood look, flares, STIFF suspension, very low weight and a butt-kicking 2.7L (at least 2.7) MFI and 9.8:1 pistons, or thereabouts. More fun than showering with the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders.
__________________
Man of Carbon Fiber (stronger than steel) Mocha 1978 911SC. "Coco" |
||
![]() |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lacey, WA. USA
Posts: 25,310
|
PS: The throttle/fuel system with the absolute WORST throttle response is CIS. A CIS engine and an MFI engine are nearly opposite.
__________________
Man of Carbon Fiber (stronger than steel) Mocha 1978 911SC. "Coco" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 3,064
|
Quote:
ianc
__________________
BMW 135i. Nice. Fast. But no 911... "I will tell you there is a big difference between driving money and driving blood, sweat and tears." - PorscheGuy79 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 343
|
Oh I doubt that....
__________________
Donald 70 S Coupe 03 SLK 01 FXDX 05 Police Interceptor |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
How many of the cheerleaders?
__________________
theamsoilguy@hotmail.com |
||
![]() |
|
AutoBahned
|
vanwyk4257 & Superman have given you good advice. Do some searches to verify what they said. I've posed before on tub wts.; wt. of the galvanizing treatment & etc.
The nice things about DME is that you can chip it be much better than CIS at any rpm range; it outperforms CIS at higher rpms already; and it can be made to work with higher EtOH levels and CIS will be in trouble there. That said, if you get an SC, you can always drive it with the CIS motor and then covert to an aftermarket EFI later. Be SURE that will be allowed by your state DEQ. If in doubt, backdate a Carrera not an SC. |
||
![]() |
|
912 Geek
|
David:
Drive an early car, then decide. Frank |
||
![]() |
|
AutoBahned
|
the problem is that he'd have to then drive a modified later car to decide - they are not that common except in SoCal
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Point Roberts, WA and Vancouver BC
Posts: 535
|
Thanks for all the info/advice guys.
I like Superman's version the best--MFI has a strong-possibly fatal- attraction for me. But just how many cheerleaders are we talking about?
__________________
Too many cars, not enough moolah... |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,384
|
The funny thing is that once you go early its almost impossible to go back. Few can go back to newer stuff. I have both. As long as its just your fun canyon carving car and not something that you need to use daily its fine. Not that they aren't reliable for daily service, its just that they are not the best with features like heat and AC and defrost.
|
||
![]() |
|
Friend of Warren
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 16,492
|
I had a '72E. Sold it and got an '86 coupe. Deleted the AC and other items. SSI's, cams, suspension. Would never go back.
__________________
Kurt V No more Porsches, but a revolving number of motorcycles. |
||
![]() |
|