![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
![]()
While inspecting the pad thickness, I noticed that the front cross-drilled rotors have concentric grooves.
I will need to change pads, but is there a concern with the rotors? It is above the minimum thickness in the grooves. I know that I should turn the rotors, but it would seem that the process would decrease the thickness of the rotor. Any advice is appreciated. Thanks, Brian
__________________
1989 Carrera 3.2 Silver Anniversary Edition 2007 BMW 750Li 2005 Honda Odyssey EX-L http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/285064-new-member-have-pics.html |
||
![]() |
|
Band.
|
Yes, you should have them machined so there's no grooves. If that takes them below the minimum thickness then you need new rotors. But rotors are cheap, so don't worry about it. That's just the way it is.
__________________
1983 SC Coupe 1963 BMW R60/2 1972 Triumph Tiger 1995 Triumph Daytona SuperIII |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 759
|
The brake rotor is really a huge heat sink. It purpose is to abosrb the heat of braking - and then disperse this heat to the atmosphere. Remember that braking is all about energy conversion.
If you machine the brake rotor is reduces the amount of heat the rotor can absorb. Basically it now has less mass. I'm not a big fan of machining brake rotors for just this reason. Richard Newton Porsche Brakes |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 75
|
Leaving the grooves will eat your new pads causing them to wear out quicker. How deep are the grooves? Any idea what caused them?
If they are shallow then it comes down to either turn them or plan on checking / replacing your pads more often. If they are deep find out what caused them fix it and get them turned / replaced. That would be my recommendation anyway. ![]()
__________________
88 Carrera Targa 04 Volvo XC-70 58 Harley Duo-Glide 96 BMW K-1100 LT |
||
![]() |
|
AutoBahned
|
also: are they rounded or sharp edged (bad)
use finger nail / touch to assess |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Burford, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,321
|
I'm assuming the groove you speak of are wear patterns. These must be removed by machining.
If you use new pads with worn rotors, you will only have a small fraction of the braking performance you would have with machined rotors; the pads would only touch the high points on the rotor. Unless the grooves are really shallow, and the rotors will machine down to above minimum thickness, it is not worth doing so; there are two minimum thicknesses: minimum machine to thickness and minimum service thickness.
__________________
Keeper of 356, 911, 912 & 914 databases; source for Kardex and CoA-type reports; email for info Researching 356, 911, 912 & 914 Paint codes, Engine #'s and Transmission #'s Addicted since 1975 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
AutoBahned
|
I thought the pads would just wear down to match a shallow, rounded groove pattern?
i.e. only sharp or deep grooves req'd new rotors... |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Burford, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,321
|
Quote:
Rule of thumb: if it is time to replace the pads, then it is time to resurface or replace the rotors.
__________________
Keeper of 356, 911, 912 & 914 databases; source for Kardex and CoA-type reports; email for info Researching 356, 911, 912 & 914 Paint codes, Engine #'s and Transmission #'s Addicted since 1975 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
1989 Carrera 3.2 Silver Anniversary Edition 2007 BMW 750Li 2005 Honda Odyssey EX-L http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=285064 |
|||
![]() |
|