Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   How to convert a SWB 912 to a 911? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/488807-how-convert-swb-912-911-a.html)

blau911 07-31-2009 05:08 AM

How to convert a SWB 912 to a 911?
 
I am thinking of buying a 912 and doing a conversion.
Can anyone plse advise what exactly is necessary to swap out a 912 motor with a 2.4S motor with Weber carb's?
The 912 already has the front set up from a 71T. Rear is still stock 912 except SC torsion bars.
From what I have gathered, I need t cut out the 912 motor mounts and install 911 mounts. Also I will need a 911 oil tank. Is there a particular year tank I will need for a 2.4T motor? Also, the car has a stock 901 5 speed gearbox. To match it with a 2.4 motor do I need a 2.4 cluthc and flywheel or a an earlier clutch flywheel from a SWB 2.0 911 motor? How about wiring?
Any knowledgable responses would be appreciated.
Thanks

JerryL 07-31-2009 06:42 AM

Do you have your eye on the 912?? have the 2.4L S motor or thinking about it??
You are correct on the tank, all wiring for said "stuff" is in the back of the 912 along with the mounting points for the tank (at least on my 66 and I assume on my 67)
I have just finished replacing the entire crossmember that has the motor mounts and deck lid latch cutout in a 71 911 not a big job amd depending how orig you want it to look you may be able to cut & splice mounts without taking out the entire cross member.

On clutch you are overlooking the early LWB cars 69-71 used the 901 / 911 transaxel as well, clutch splines are the same others may know about flywheel clearance in bellhousing.

But back to orig question, If you have the 912 or are looking at one you know what is up with motor mounts, if not drop me a note and I can give you pics of both. Same with the motor, Yes the 2.4LS is the dream motor for early cars (also look at the $$$) but if yu dont have the motor stashed away you may look at the 2.0 & 2.2L motors as you can get plenty of HP from either of those and have more to chose from.

Let me know if you want pics.

Regards

66 912 Coupe
67 912 Targa (euro)
71 911 Targa

3/4 of a 68 912 Coupe going away!

nilknarf 07-31-2009 07:03 AM

Hey Blau, I'm doing basically the same thing with a '66 (putting in a '76 2.7)... I can't say I'm any expert on the subject, because I haven't made much progress yet. One bit of advice I've gotten that seems good to pass along is that when you get ready to install your 911 motor mounts, it's best to bolt a case and transaxle together (all mounting hardware included) and use that to accurately position your weld-in mounts in the corners of the engine bay. The PO of my car didn't do that, and now I'll have to cut my mounts out again for a better go of it. (he used 1/8" angle iron to cobb up a real mess (I can send you pix of what NOT to do!)- I rescued some real mounts from a wrecked 68 targa that I'm getting ready to install.

Hey Jerry- I'd love to see pix of your work! :)

Curt

Peter Zimmermann 07-31-2009 08:32 AM

These might help, although this conversion was a '69 (LWB) model 912 to 911. I used an oil tank (I think it was a '74) that allowed use of a clamped rubber "S" hose between the tank and engine cooler (you want to match the cooler on the engine to the oil tank so you can use an early S hose with fittings, or a later version with clamps). The electrical was a modified early 911 panel wired as necessary for the application. The oil lines were factory from the thermostat forward to a multi-row RoW SC cooler (we cut out the right side battery box and closed the hole with a steel plate). We used a fuel pump from a 2.2 liter "T" (for carb application) and mounted the pump behind the gas tank using an original '69 mounting bracket. The oil tank/filter opening was done with a template made on a different car. The dashboard was a 5-gauge panel, which greatly simplified the instrument problem.

Engine mount (raw):

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1249057178.jpg

Engine mount (finished):

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1249057253.jpg

Oil lines (rear view):

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1249057328.jpg

Oil lines (side view):

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1249057392.jpg

Electrical:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1249057440.jpg

Oil filter/breathers:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1249057539.jpg

Engine (installed):

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1249057607.jpg

Fuel pump:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1249057672.jpg

Dash:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1249057724.jpg

One matter of real concern is the rear torsion bar tube. I didn't want to chance having mine break, from an unknown amount of internal rust, so we replaced the tube with a new, factory, galvanized unit. We removed the rear seat bottoms, created holes in the steel panels to allow access so the new tube could be welded all the way around at each end, then re-closed the holes. The tube and engine mounts were replaced/installed with the chassis on a frame bench, so location of the different parts was not in doubt. I used a "push-type" clutch with a 2.0L flywheel (lightened) along with the 5-speed transmission original to the 912. The conversion, done right, is extremely expensive, but very rewarding.

JerryL 07-31-2009 09:20 AM

Very nice work and results!!

Regards

blau911 08-01-2009 11:37 AM

Quote:

The conversion, done right, is extremely expensive, but very rewarding.
Thanks for theinfo guys. Just one question, what is considered expensive? I have a complete 2.4 carb'd motor with engine tin as well as the 911 motor mounts. The car also has a 911 front set-up. So where is the real cost involved besides welding in the motor mounts and getting the correct flywheel?

Peter Zimmermann 08-01-2009 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blau911 (Post 4811674)
Thanks for theinfo guys. Just one question, what is considered expensive? I have a complete 2.4 carb'd motor with engine tin as well as the 911 motor mounts. The car also has a 911 front set-up. So where is the real cost involved besides welding in the motor mounts and getting the correct flywheel?

I think that you better price oil lines (a 2.4S will require a front cooler), a torsion bar tube, an oil tank, a clutch, mechanical condition of the car (brake calipers/rotors/shocks/wheel bearings/suspension bushings/electrical/gauges/pedal assembly/clutch cable/fuel delivery/etc.), and how much of that you're going to pay to have done. And then there's the transmission that comes with the car, surely you wouldn't do all that work and not open the trans, would you?

doublestuff 08-01-2009 05:20 PM

If you haven't seen Speedo's SWB 912 to 911 project, check it out. It should be mandatory reading if you are thinking of doing it.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/345183-swb-911r-beginning.html?highlight=swb+project

Jason

TRE Cup 08-01-2009 05:35 PM

i recommend the larger oil tanks from 74-89. Newer the better so there is no corrosion. These have more oil capacity and if your intent is some spirited driving, it wouldn't hurt to have the extra capacity. As far as external oil cooler, maybe not. Depends where you live and if this is just a street car. Carbed or mfi motors tend to run rich and the fuel laden mixture means cooler oil temps. You can always add the external cooler later

Shaun @ Tru6 08-01-2009 06:49 PM

Garth, I have an excellent torsion bar tube I cut and saved from a 73 last year, if you want to go that route. it's as clean as an 89.

blau911 08-01-2009 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRE Cup (Post 4812152)
i recommend the larger oil tanks from 74-89. Newer the better so there is no corrosion. These have more oil capacity and if your intent is some spirited driving, it wouldn't hurt to have the extra capacity. As far as external oil cooler, maybe not. Depends where you live and if this is just a street car. Carbed or mfi motors tend to run rich and the fuel laden mixture means cooler oil temps. You can always add the external cooler later

Good points. I already have a front oil cooler setup from a LWB 73 car which I assume will also work on a 1967 SWB car. The rest of the car is supposedly in good driving condition.
It already has 5 gauges, and the tranny is a 5 speed in good condition.

rolls 912 03-03-2010 02:32 PM

Conversion
 
Hi

I have almost finished my 912 conversion running a 3.2. Fairly easy actually. Little stumped with the 915 axles and fitting the muffler but apart from that, very straight forward.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1267659110.jpg

Grady Clay 03-03-2010 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blau911 (Post 4812400)
Good points. I already have a front oil cooler setup from a LWB 73 car which I assume will also work on a 1967 SWB car. The rest of the car is supposedly in good driving condition.
It already has 5 gauges, and the tranny is a 5 speed in good condition.

Oooo …
Be careful here.

The ’73 only front oil cooler system does not have a pressure relief valve. That device at the oil tank fitting is a thermostat only. The system was designed to only use a ‘trombone’ front cooler and not anything else more fragile.

Without a thermostat/pressure relief valve as used ’74-’89, the cooler will probably fail from overpressure.

Check your ’67 transmission and see if it has the ‘simplified’ differential. If you can see the hex head in the center of the transmission axle flange – it has the ‘simplified’ version and may need update. *Without the update, the transmission can destroy itself.)



Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Zimmermann (Post 4809838)

Peter,

Good installation.
With a new torsion bar tube were you able to weld in the connection (’74->) between the tube and the end of the tunnel?

For anyone wanting maximum inboard tire/wheel clearance on the right-rear, use some unique Elephant Racing pipe/hose assemblies between the thermostat and engine. These hoses go up and over the tire inside the fender.

The chassis on ’74-’89 has an indentation for the pipes where they pass the axle area. That indentation is not present on any ‘long-hood’ other than ’73.


Quote:

Originally Posted by rolls 912 (Post 5216226)
Hi. I have almost finished my 912 conversion running a 3.2. Fairly easy actually. Little stumped with the 915 axles and fitting the muffler but apart from that, very straight forward.

Please look up some of my posts on this subject (past month or two, I think). Axles ARE a big issue with a SWB.

Best,
Grady


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.