|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
K&N filter on mfi
About a year ago when i started ripping apart my car I bought a K&N filter for my 72 mfi. I threw away the old paper element one. Since it was a long time since I started and ran the car, I didn't get a chance to compare the two. Is the K&N less restrictive on an mfi engine? Anybody running this filter? What are the mfi guys out there running. Should I just stick with the K&N or is the paper element better?
Thanks all
__________________
72 911 Although it is done at the moment, it will never be finished. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Uhhhhh... Anyone???
__________________
72 911 Although it is done at the moment, it will never be finished. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Wish I could help.....sounds like we both need to go re-read Andersons book....Brian
__________________
75 914 2.0L 73 914 2.0L X2 73 914 1.7L X3 71 914 1.7L 87 944S 1987 SAAB 900 Turbo 80 Euro 911SC 1980 Yamaha XT500 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Linn County, Oregon
Posts: 48,573
|
I sincerely doubt you'll notice any performance improvement. Also, you may be giving up a wee bit in the size of particles removed by the filter.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 45
|
Although there are ways to mount a pair of K&N's or ITG air filters on the later plastic stacks, the engine makes more power (on the dyno) with the stock plastic air cleaner housing, sans preheat assembly and rubber tube, and a new paper element.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Stay away from my Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Agoura, CA
Posts: 5,773
|
I humbly suggest trying the "search" button above...
__________________
Chris C. 1973 914 "R" (914-6) | track toy 2009 911 Turbo 6-speed (997.1TT) | street weapon 2021 Tesla Model 3 Performance | daily driver 2001 F150 Supercrew 4x4 | hauler |
||
|
|
|
|