![]() |
|
|
|
Registered User
|
![]()
I am wanting to raise the rear of my 911 by say a 1/4" to 3/8". The PO had a new suspension put in, and had it lowered, but its just a tad too low in the rear for my taste! Am I nuts to want to raise it a bit? Is it going to be more trouble than its worth?
Basically right now you cant see the ENTIRE TIRE at the top of the wheel well, part is tucked under. I would like to raise it just to the point where I can see the entire tire at the top, and nothing more. Again, am I nuts? Thanks! Rod
__________________
1989 911 Targa M491 1980 Triumph TR8 (sold) 2006 BMW M3 (Interlagos Blue) Last edited by RSM-M491; 04-04-2011 at 03:30 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Diss Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SC - (Aiken in the 'other' SC)
Posts: 5,020
|
The height of the rear is relative to the front. The front fender arch should show more tire then the rear. The easy measure is at the wheel archs. The fronts should be about 1/2 higher then the rear.
The real common lowering spec is to go to "Euro height" which measures 25-1/2" at the front and 25" at the rear. Unless the front to rear rake is off you will want to raise the front and rear together.
__________________
- "Speed kills! How fast do you want to go?" - anon. - "If More is better then Too Much is just right!!!" - Mad Mac Durgeloh -- Wayne - 87 Carrera coupe -> The pooch. |
||
![]() |
|
Northern Motorhead
|
Rod,
Yes,you're nuts ... lol Normally a one finger gap all around is good,although depending on wheels,tire brand,etc... a two finger gap might be necessary in the front to prevent rubbing ! Again if you have a stock suspension,put your hand on top of the tires and see if your knuckles clear the fender,that is also a more conservative height ... Show some pics !!! Cheers ! Phil
__________________
Cheers Phil 89 Coupe,Black,95 3.6 engine and the list goes on ... 1983 944 SP2 race car PCA #96 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 12,650
|
Lower == Better handling
Are you having any issues? Tire rubbing? Unable to navaigate streets witthout scraping? Odd handling? Brake lockups? If not, leave alone.
__________________
Harry 1970 VW Sunroof Bus - "The Magic Bus" 1971 Jaguar XKE 2+2 V12 Coupe - {insert name here} 1973.5 911T Targa - "Smokey" 2020 MB E350 4Matic |
||
![]() |
|
Wash. State
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,569
|
"Again, am I nuts?"
No, I am with you. I had my '86 worked on and totally aligned for less than $200. I can't help you in KY, unfortunately. See below, I think this is maybe more than you want, but is easily achieved, it's where mine is, and I love it; ride, handling, and especially the look (picture is not my car): ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,093
|
It won't hurt anything to raise it up a bit. A 1/4 inch might be doable depending on where your adjustable springplates are at currently. If this isn't going to work, then re-indexing the torsion bars is the only other option. That is a job you don't want to just jump into, though.
Is it doable at home? Yes, IF you have the right tools. The best thing to do is to get it corner balanced when you get it where you want it.
__________________
1981 911SC ROW SOLD - JULY 2015 Pacific Blue Wayne |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14,093
|
![]() Here's mine: If I remember correctly- 25" rear 25" front Yeah, I know the front should measure higher. ![]()
__________________
1981 911SC ROW SOLD - JULY 2015 Pacific Blue Wayne |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
![]()
No, I am not having ANY issues (rubbing etc.) Handles and rides great. Strictly a looks thing for me. I feel the car does not have the look I want. Which for me is slight higher in the rear than the front. In other words slopped MORE from the rear to the front to give it a more "aggressive look". I really think 1/4" up in the rear would do it. Rigth now I can barely get my hand in between the wheel well and the tire in the rear.... Here are a couple of pics I took in the garage. The floor is not level, but not terrible.... Thoughts?!
Thanks! Rod ![]() ![]()
__________________
1989 911 Targa M491 1980 Triumph TR8 (sold) 2006 BMW M3 (Interlagos Blue) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 12,650
|
Due to the how the wheel wells are set, you most likely have the desired 1% rake. Typically the rear is about 1/2" lower than the front, but the car chassis is actually raked correctly.
Please measure your distance from the ground to your wheel well opening peaks. That will tell the story.
__________________
Harry 1970 VW Sunroof Bus - "The Magic Bus" 1971 Jaguar XKE 2+2 V12 Coupe - {insert name here} 1973.5 911T Targa - "Smokey" 2020 MB E350 4Matic |
||
![]() |
|
Northern Motorhead
|
The rear looks pretty good,a lot of people would be happy with that setting,although from the pics the front end looks a little on the high side !
It's nice to see a turbo look wheel arch well filled in like that... Cheers ! Phil
__________________
Cheers Phil 89 Coupe,Black,95 3.6 engine and the list goes on ... 1983 944 SP2 race car PCA #96 |
||
![]() |
|
Banned but not out, yet..
|
Raising your car, even the rear, will negatively affect handling. You are in effect raising the center of gravity - which is considered counter productive. If you prefer an 'aggressive look' at the cost of a technically less agressive stance, go for it. As long as it looks good in your eyes (maybe not someone who knows about handling) then go for it.
__________________
An air cooled refrigerator. ‘Mein Teil’ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: S. California
Posts: 1,105
|
"Lower == Better handling"
HarryD: Are you sure about lower = better handling ? |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered User
|
Hmm.... then maybe the issue is the front? I will have to re think it... I do not want to ruin the handling. I was hopeing for both!
Rod
__________________
1989 911 Targa M491 1980 Triumph TR8 (sold) 2006 BMW M3 (Interlagos Blue) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 12,650
|
Quote:
Others will tell you that Jeff has never seen a car that could not be lowered more. YMMV ![]()
__________________
Harry 1970 VW Sunroof Bus - "The Magic Bus" 1971 Jaguar XKE 2+2 V12 Coupe - {insert name here} 1973.5 911T Targa - "Smokey" 2020 MB E350 4Matic |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MS/NH/PNW
Posts: 259
|
Quote:
I was about to mention the same thing. Although chassis dependent, lower does not necessarily mean better handling as it is possible to further separate the roll center and the center of gravity by lowering, which creates a larger roll moment. Not trying to be a jerk, but many times gross generalizations are incorrect, and get repeated over and over until they are considered fact. Something to chew on.
__________________
Stephen GruppeB #906 1970 911T |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 4,740
|
Quote:
Popular misconception. Old school ricer mentality. Go ahead and raise it an inch and it will ride and handle better due to improved alignment geometry and suspension travel as intended by the wizards of Weissach. Alignment geometry trups center of gravity anytime. Last edited by stlrj; 04-04-2011 at 08:06 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: S. California
Posts: 1,105
|
I am pretty sure that lower doesnt always = better handling. There are a LOT of variables that determine how well a car handles.
I would be interested to see what Flieger has to say about this. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 4,740
|
I couldn't have said it any better. In fact, most 911s that have been lowered would benefit from and handle much better the closer they came to factory height.
Last edited by stlrj; 04-04-2011 at 10:48 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
I think the forum needs to understand the current ride height before issuing pronouncements like "not low enough", "just right", "raise it a bit". Suggestion: provide a side view on level ground, then as previously suggested, provide current ride height measurements from ground to wheel well opening. Since it appears turbo, RSR or aftermarket flares are installed along with aftermarket wheels/tires, the normal "Euro height" settings may not apply.
Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
+1
__________________
My journey... '68 912, '80 911 SC Targa, '91 964 C2, '93 964 C2, '95 993 (my favorite!), '04 Alpina B3 3.3 (ex Damon Hill's personal ride), '99 996 C2 Cab, '02 996, '87 Carrera Coupe, black on black... Gorgeous. Currently: triple black 08 C4 Cab and on the lookout for an early Longhood project..... ![]() |
||
![]() |
|